Literature DB >> 20010515

An update on laparoscopic resection for rectal cancer.

David Row1, Martin R Weiser.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: In the current age of minimally invasive surgery, laparoscopic surgery for colon cancer has been established as oncologically equivalent to conventional open surgery. The advantages of laparoscopic surgery have translated into smaller incisions and shorter recovery. However, the narrow confines of the bony pelvis and angling limits in current stapling technology, along with the standard practice of autonomic nerve-sparing total mesorectal excision, have made laparoscopic surgery in the setting of rectal cancer more challenging. The available literature focusing on laparoscopic resection for rectal cancer has been predominantly retrospective in nature, with a limited number of prospective studies.
METHODS: This article discusses the current status of laparoscopic rectal cancer resection. A review of the more recent retrospective and prospective data specifically on laparoscopic resection for mid to low rectal cancer was performed.
RESULTS: The number of prospective randomized trials addressing laparoscopic rectal cancer resection is limited. In the largest trial (MRC CLASICC), an initial increased rate of positive circumferential margins within the laparoscopic anterior resection cohort, although nonsignificant, raised concerns regarding its oncologic adequacy. These concerns did not translate into a difference in local recurrence at 3 years. Improved short-term outcomes, including quicker recovery times, shorter hospital stays, and reduced analgesic requirements (albeit at the price of longer operative times and higher overall cost), have been demonstrated in some studies.
CONCLUSIONS: In view of the limited prospective data, laparoscopic resection for mid to low rectal cancer is still investigational in the United States. While feasibility studies are promising, open surgical resection remains the current standard of care. It is hoped that the long-term results of ongoing and newly initiated multi-institutional trials will fully define the role of laparoscopy in the treatment of mid to low rectal cancer.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20010515     DOI: 10.1177/107327481001700103

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cancer Control        ISSN: 1073-2748            Impact factor:   3.302


  15 in total

Review 1.  Robotic general surgery: current practice, evidence, and perspective.

Authors:  M Jung; P Morel; L Buehler; N C Buchs; M E Hagen
Journal:  Langenbecks Arch Surg       Date:  2015-02-18       Impact factor: 3.445

2.  Successful total shift from multiport to single-port laparoscopic surgery in low anterior resection of colorectal cancer.

Authors:  Say-June Kim; Byung-Jo Choi; Sang Chul Lee
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2014-05-23       Impact factor: 4.584

3.  The current state of the transanal approach to the ileal pouch-anal anastomosis.

Authors:  F Borja de Lacy; Deborah Susan Keller; Beatriz Martin-Perez; Sameh Hany Emile; Manish Chand; Antonino Spinelli; Antonio M Lacy
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2019-01-23       Impact factor: 4.584

4.  Predicting opportunities to increase utilization of laparoscopy for rectal cancer.

Authors:  Deborah S Keller; Jiejing Qiu; Anthony J Senagore
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2017-09-15       Impact factor: 4.584

5.  Stage- and age-adjusted cost-effectiveness analysis of laparoscopic surgery in rectal cancer.

Authors:  Javier Mar; Ane Anton-Ladislao; Oliver Ibarrondo; Arantzazu Arrospide; Santiago Lázaro-Aramburu; Nerea Gonzalez; Marisa Bare; Antonio Escobar; Maximino Redondo; José M Quintana
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2019-05-28       Impact factor: 4.584

6.  Short-term outcomes after laparoscopic-assisted proctectomy for rectal cancer: results from the ACS NSQIP.

Authors:  David Yu Greenblatt; Victoria Rajamanickam; Andrew J Pugely; Charles P Heise; Eugene F Foley; Gregory D Kennedy
Journal:  J Am Coll Surg       Date:  2011-03-16       Impact factor: 6.113

7.  Integration of open and laparoscopic approaches for rectal cancer resection: oncologic and short-term outcomes.

Authors:  Deborah S Keller; Ki-Jae Park; Knut-Magne Augestad; Conor P Delaney
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2014-02-01       Impact factor: 4.584

8.  Laparoscopic surgery for rectal cancer: The state of the art.

Authors:  Carlo Staudacher; Andrea Vignali
Journal:  World J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2010-09-27

9.  Integration of transanal specimen extraction into laparoscopic anterior resection with total mesorectal excision for rectal cancer: a consecutive series of 179 patients.

Authors:  Morris E Franklin; Song Liang; Karla Russek
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2012-07-26       Impact factor: 4.584

10.  Laparoscopic and converted approaches to rectal cancer resection have superior long-term outcomes: a comparative study by operative approach.

Authors:  Deborah S Keller; Zhamak Khorgami; Brian Swendseid; Bradley J Champagne; Harry L Reynolds; Sharon L Stein; Conor P Delaney
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2014-02-11       Impact factor: 4.584

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.