Literature DB >> 20010393

Biomechanical characteristics of different regions of the human spine: an in vitro study on multilevel spinal segments.

Iris Busscher1, Jaap H van Dieën, Idsart Kingma, Albert J van der Veen, Gijsbertus J Verkerke, Albert G Veldhuizen.   

Abstract

STUDY DESIGN.: An in vitro study on human multilevel spinal segments. OBJECTIVE.: To determine the differences in biomechanical characteristics between 4 separate regions of the human spine and to provide quantitative information is derived on the range of motion (ROM), neutral zone (NZ), neutral zone stiffness (NZstiff), and flexibility (FLEX). SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA.: Limited literature is available about the biomechanical behavior of different regions of the human spine, in particular with multilevel segments. Test setup en protocols were different between studies and therefore outcomes of separate regions are hardly comparable. METHODS.: A total of 24 spinal segments of 6 human cadaveric spines were prepared for biomechanical testing. Each specimen contained 4 vertebrae and 3 intervertebral discs: T1-T4, T5-T8, T9-T12, and L1-L4. Pure moments were applied to a maximum of 4 Nm in flexion/extension, lateral bending, and axial rotation. Displacement of individual motion segments was measured using a 3-dimensional movement registration system. ROM, NZ, NZstiff, and FLEX of the spinal regions were calculated from the acquired load-displacement data. RESULTS.: In axial direction, ROM and NZ decreased and NZ stiffness increased from high to low vertebral levels. For flexion/extension and lateral flexion highest ROM and NZ and lowest NZ stiffness values were found at the T1-T4 and L1-L4 regions. NZ magnitudes and NZ stiffnesses were negatively correlated (P < 0.05). Flexibility of the spinal regions was variable; no significant differences were found between the 4 spinal regions. CONCLUSION.: This study showed the differences in ROM, NZ, and NZ stiffness between thoracolumbar regions of the human spine in axial rotation, flexion/extension, and lateral bending. Separate multilevel spinal segments were tested in 1 study, and therefore characteristics of different regions are truly comparable.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 20010393     DOI: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e3181b4c75d

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)        ISSN: 0362-2436            Impact factor:   3.468


  15 in total

1.  Intraoperative determination of the load–displacement behavior of scoliotic spinal motion segments: preliminary clinical results.

Authors:  Christoph Reutlinger; Carol Hasler; Klaus Scheffler; Philippe Büchler
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2012-08       Impact factor: 3.134

2.  Elastic resistance of the spine: Why does motion preservation surgery almost fail?

Authors:  Alessandro Landi
Journal:  World J Clin Cases       Date:  2013-07-16       Impact factor: 1.337

3.  Mechanical role of the posterior column components in the cervical spine.

Authors:  Robert A Hartman; Robert E Tisherman; Cheng Wang; Kevin M Bell; Joon Y Lee; Gwendolyn A Sowa; James D Kang
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2016-04-06       Impact factor: 3.134

4.  Spinal fusion using adipose stem cells seeded on a radiolucent cage filler: a feasibility study of a single surgical procedure in goats.

Authors:  Robert J Kroeze; Theo H Smit; Pieter P Vergroesen; Ruud A Bank; Reinout Stoop; Bert van Rietbergen; Barend J van Royen; Marco N Helder
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2014-11-25       Impact factor: 3.134

5.  Relation between radiological assessment and biomechanical stability of lumbar interbody fusion in a large animal model.

Authors:  R J Kroeze; A J van der Veen; B J van Royen; R A Bank; M N Helder; T H Smit
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2013-09-17       Impact factor: 3.134

Review 6.  Full-field in vitro investigation of hard and soft tissue strain in the spine by means of Digital Image Correlation.

Authors:  Maria Luisa Ruspi; Marco Palanca; Cesare Faldini; Luca Cristofolini
Journal:  Muscles Ligaments Tendons J       Date:  2018-04-16

7.  Quantifying intervertebral disc mechanics: a new definition of the neutral zone.

Authors:  Theodoor H Smit; Manon Slm van Tunen; Albert J van der Veen; Idsart Kingma; Jaap H van Dieën
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2011-02-07       Impact factor: 2.362

8.  The effects of single-level instrumented lumbar laminectomy on adjacent spinal biomechanics.

Authors:  Arno Bisschop; Roderick M Holewijn; Idsart Kingma; Agnita Stadhouder; Pieter-Paul A Vergroesen; Albert J van der Veen; Jaap H van Dieën; Barend J van Royen
Journal:  Global Spine J       Date:  2014-11-06

9.  Anterior Versus Posterior Decompression for Degenerative Thoracic Spine Diseases: A Comparison of Complications.

Authors:  Aidin Abedi; Blake Formanek; Raymond Hah; Zorica Buser; Jeffrey C Wang
Journal:  Global Spine J       Date:  2020-02-21

10.  Spinal Motion and Muscle Activity during Active Trunk Movements - Comparing Sheep and Humans Adopting Upright and Quadrupedal Postures.

Authors:  Stephanie Valentin; Theresia F Licka
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-01-07       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.