Literature DB >> 20008424

The choking game: physician perspectives.

Julie L McClave1, Patricia J Russell, Anne Lyren, Mary Ann O'Riordan, Nancy E Bass.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The goal was to assess awareness of the choking game among physicians who care for adolescents and to explore their opinions regarding its inclusion in anticipatory guidance.
METHODS: We surveyed 865 pediatricians and family practitioners. The survey was designed to assess physicians' awareness of the choking game and its warning signs, the suspected prevalence of patients' participation in the activity, and the willingness of physicians to include the choking game in adolescent anticipatory guidance. Information on the general use of anticipatory guidance also was collected.
RESULTS: The survey was completed by 163 physicians (response rate: 21.8%). One-hundred eleven (68.1%) had heard of the choking game, 68 of them (61.3%) through sources in the popular media. General pediatricians were significantly more likely to report being aware of the choking game than were family practitioners or pediatric subspecialists (P = .004). Of physicians who were aware of the choking game, 75.7% identified >or=1 warning sign and 52.3% identified >or=3. Only 7.6% of physicians who were aware of the choking game reported that they cared for a patient they suspected was participating in the activity, and 2 (1.9%) reported that they include the choking game in anticipatory guidance for adolescents. However, 64.9% of all respondents agreed that the choking game should be included in anticipatory guidance.
CONCLUSIONS: Close to one third of physicians surveyed were unaware of the choking game, a potentially life-threatening activity practiced by adolescents. Despite acknowledging that the choking game should be included in adolescent anticipatory guidance, few physicians reported actually discussing it. To provide better care for their adolescent patients, pediatricians and family practitioners should be knowledgeable about risky behaviors encountered by their patients, including the choking game, and provide timely guidance about its dangers.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 20008424     DOI: 10.1542/peds.2009-1287

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Pediatrics        ISSN: 0031-4005            Impact factor:   7.124


  3 in total

1.  Impact of Education on School-aged Children's Knowledge of and Participation in "The Choking Game".

Authors:  Kendall Butler; Bonnie Raingruber; Eric Butler; Machelle Wilson
Journal:  Res Rev J Nurs Health Sci       Date:  2016-06-13

2.  Prevention of the Choking Game: parent perspectives.

Authors:  Jessica M Bernacki; W Hobart Davies
Journal:  J Inj Violence Res       Date:  2011-04-16

Review 3.  Prevalence and associated harm of engagement in self-asphyxial behaviours ('choking game') in young people: a systematic review.

Authors:  H Busse; T Harrop; D Gunnell; R Kipping
Journal:  Arch Dis Child       Date:  2015-06-25       Impact factor: 3.791

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.