Literature DB >> 20007861

The bottleneck in the cancer biomarker pipeline and protein quantification through mass spectrometry-based approaches: current strategies for candidate verification.

Shalini Makawita1, Eleftherios P Diamandis.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Although robust discovery-phase platforms have resulted in the generation of large numbers of candidate cancer biomarkers, a comparable system for subsequent quantitative assessment and verification of all candidates is lacking. Established immunoassays and available antibodies permit analysis of small subsets of candidates; however, the lack of commercially available reagents, coupled with high costs and lengthy production and purification times, have rendered the large majority of candidates untestable. CONTENT: Mass spectrometry (MS), and in particular multiple reaction monitoring (MRM)-MS, has emerged as an alternative technology to immunoassays for quantification of target proteins. Novel biomarkers are expected to be present in serum in the low (microg/L-ng/L) range, but analysis of complex serum or plasma digests by MS has yielded milligram per liter limits of detection at best. The coupling of prior sample purification strategies such as enrichment of target analytes, depletion of high-abundance proteins, and prefractionation, has enabled reliable penetration into the low microgram per liter range. This review highlights prospects for candidate verification through MS-based methods. We first outline the biomarker discovery pipeline and its existing bottleneck; we then discuss various MRM-based strategies for targeted protein quantification, the applicability of such methods for candidate verification, and points of concern.
SUMMARY: Although it is unlikely that MS-based protein quantification will replace immunoassays in the near future, with the expected improvements in limits of detection and specificity in instrumentation, MRM-based approaches show great promise for alleviating the existing bottleneck to discovery.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2009        PMID: 20007861     DOI: 10.1373/clinchem.2009.127019

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Chem        ISSN: 0009-9147            Impact factor:   8.327


  46 in total

1.  Personalized Medicine in the Age of Pharmacoproteomics: A Close up on India and Need for Social Science Engagement for Responsible Innovation in Post-Proteomic Biology.

Authors:  Panga Jaipal Reddy; Rekha Jain; Young-Ki Paik; Robin Downey; Adam S Ptolemy; Vural Ozdemir; Sanjeeva Srivastava
Journal:  Curr Pharmacogenomics Person Med       Date:  2011-03-01

Review 2.  Mass spectrometric immunoassay revisited.

Authors:  Randall W Nelson; Chad R Borges
Journal:  J Am Soc Mass Spectrom       Date:  2011-03-08       Impact factor: 3.109

3.  Identification of a novel proteoform of prostate specific antigen (SNP-L132I) in clinical samples by multiple reaction monitoring.

Authors:  Akos Végvári; Karin Sjödin; Melinda Rezeli; Johan Malm; Hans Lilja; Thomas Laurell; György Marko-Varga
Journal:  Mol Cell Proteomics       Date:  2013-07-10       Impact factor: 5.911

Review 4.  Current application of proteomics in biomarker discovery for inflammatory bowel disease.

Authors:  Patrick Py Chan; Valerie C Wasinger; Rupert W Leong
Journal:  World J Gastrointest Pathophysiol       Date:  2016-02-15

5.  Investigation of Ion Transmission Effects on Intact Protein Quantification in a Triple Quadrupole Mass Spectrometer.

Authors:  Evelyn H Wang; Dananjaya Kalu Appulage; Erin A McAllister; Kevin A Schug
Journal:  J Am Soc Mass Spectrom       Date:  2017-05-30       Impact factor: 3.109

Review 6.  Mass spectrometry: A platform for biomarker discovery and validation for Alzheimer's and Parkinson's diseases.

Authors:  Eugene M Cilento; Lorrain Jin; Tessandra Stewart; Min Shi; Lifu Sheng; Jing Zhang
Journal:  J Neurochem       Date:  2019-01-31       Impact factor: 5.372

Review 7.  Screening and detection of pancreatic cancer. Highlights from the "2011 ASCO Annual Meeting". Chicago, IL, USA; June 3-7, 2011.

Authors:  Tamas A Gonda; Aimee Lucas; Muhammad Wasif Saif
Journal:  JOP       Date:  2011-07-08

Review 8.  Proteomic studies of urinary biomarkers for prostate, bladder and kidney cancers.

Authors:  Steven L Wood; Margaret A Knowles; Douglas Thompson; Peter J Selby; Rosamonde E Banks
Journal:  Nat Rev Urol       Date:  2013-02-26       Impact factor: 14.432

9.  Multiple Reaction Monitoring for Direct Quantitation of Intact Proteins Using a Triple Quadrupole Mass Spectrometer.

Authors:  Evelyn H Wang; Peter C Combe; Kevin A Schug
Journal:  J Am Soc Mass Spectrom       Date:  2016-03-08       Impact factor: 3.109

Review 10.  Recent advances in cardiovascular proteomics.

Authors:  Parveen Sharma; Jake Cosme; Anthony O Gramolini
Journal:  J Proteomics       Date:  2012-11-12       Impact factor: 4.044

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.