Literature DB >> 2000756

Extraction of implanted transvenous pacing leads: a review of a persistent clinical problem.

M R Myers1, V Parsonnet, A D Bernstein.   

Abstract

Within a few months of implantation, permanent pacemaker leads become ensheathed in fibrocollagenous tissue. This tissue may anchor the lead so that it is difficult, dangerous, or impossible to remove it. Leads with bulbous or finned tips are particularly resistant to extraction. The risks of applying traction to an entrapped lead include induction of bradycardia or ventricular tachycardia and fibrillation, invagination of the right ventricle, avulsion of the right ventricular myocardium or tricuspid valve, hemopericardium, and cardiac tamponade. Forceful traction may result in uncoiling of the conductor, disruption of the insulation, or complete fracture, leaving an intravascular remnant that may embolize or be a source for thrombosis. Although fixation and abandonment of an inactive chronically implanted lead is frequently appropriate and is known to pose little long-term risk, the retained inactive lead may interact adversely with a new active lead and then increase the risk of venous thrombosis, serve as a potential nidus for infection, or produce spurious electrical sensing signals that may be sensed by the pulse generator. Absolute indications for lead removal are those in which there would be a life-threatening situation if the lead were to remain in situ. In the absence of an absolute indication, the decision to proceed with extraction must be made by weighing the potential for serious morbidity or mortality against risks of the extraction technique. Techniques for lead removal include traction and open cardiotomy operations. When a portion of the lead is intravascular, forceps, snares, baskets, countertraction, or lead-transection devices may be used to retrieve the fragment.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1991        PMID: 2000756     DOI: 10.1016/0002-8703(91)90203-t

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am Heart J        ISSN: 0002-8703            Impact factor:   4.749


  7 in total

Review 1.  Pacemaker lead complications: when is extraction appropriate and what can we learn from published data?

Authors:  F A Bracke; A Meijer; L M van Gelder
Journal:  Heart       Date:  2001-03       Impact factor: 5.994

2.  Cardiac device-related endocarditis: Epidemiology, pathogenesis, diagnosis and treatment - a review.

Authors:  Shimon Edelstein; Malka Yahalom
Journal:  Int J Angiol       Date:  2009

3.  Successful extraction of right ventricular lead remnants using the FlexCath® steerable sheath.

Authors:  Tanyanan Tanawuttiwat; Alan Cheng; John Rickard; Grant V Chow; Christopher M Sciortino; Jeffrey Brinker
Journal:  J Interv Card Electrophysiol       Date:  2015-09-03       Impact factor: 1.900

4.  Thrombolysis is an appropriate treatment in lead-associated infective endocarditis with giant vegetations located on the right atrial lead.

Authors:  Karin Anne Lydia Mueller; Iris I Mueller; Hans-Joerg Weig; Volker Doernberger; Meinrad Gawaz
Journal:  BMJ Case Rep       Date:  2012-06-14

5.  Is there an adverse outcome from abandoned pacing leads?

Authors:  C Suga; D L Hayes; L K Hyberger; M A Lloyd
Journal:  J Interv Card Electrophysiol       Date:  2000-10       Impact factor: 1.900

6.  Reflections of six years of lead extraction: influence on indications and technique.

Authors:  F A Bracke; A Meijer; B van Gelder
Journal:  Neth Heart J       Date:  2004-03       Impact factor: 2.380

7.  Incidence and clinical implication of nosocomial infections associated with implantable biomaterials - catheters, ventilator-associated pneumonia, urinary tract infections.

Authors:  Josef Peter Guggenbichler; Ojan Assadian; Michael Boeswald; Axel Kramer
Journal:  GMS Krankenhhyg Interdiszip       Date:  2011-12-15
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.