Literature DB >> 20007073

Risks faced by donors of right lobe for living donor liver transplantation.

Shun Ran1, Tian-Fu Wen, Lu-Nan Yan, Bo Li, Yong Zeng, Zhe-Yu Chen, Yu Zhang, Zhi-Xue Liao, Guan-Lin Liang, Guo Li, Xian-Hua Zhang.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Because of the shortage of deceased donors with livers fit for transplantation, living donor liver transplantation (LDLT) is becoming an attractive alternative. Attention should be paid to the donors, especially to those of the right lobe. In this study, we evaluated the risks faced by donors of the right lobe for adult-to-adult LDLT.
METHODS: The perioperative data from 105 consecutive living donors of the right lobe performed in West China Hospital from January 2002 to December 2007 were retrospectively studied. Preoperative evaluation included CT, MRCP, and intraoperative cholangiography, showing liver volume, hepatic vasculature and the biliary system. The standard liver volume (SLV) and the ratio of left lobe volume to SLV were calculated. The right lobe grafts were obtained by transecting the liver on the right side of the middle hepatic vein without inflow vascular occlusion, using an ultrasonic dissector. After operation the donors were monitored in the Intensive Care Unit for about three days. Each donor was followed up for at least 6 months.
RESULTS: There was no donor mortality. Major complications occurred in 14 donors (13.3%), of whom 3 received conservative treatment, 8 required invasive paracentesis, and 3 required further surgery. All donors were recovered well and resumed their previous occupations.
CONCLUSIONS: Donors of the right lobe face low risks. The preoperative evaluation, especially evaluation of the volume of the remnant liver, should be exact. During the operation, the patency of the remnant hepatic vasculature and bile duct must be preserved, and the extent of injury to the remnant liver should be limited as much as possible. The detection and treatment of postoperative complications should be diligently performed.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 20007073

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hepatobiliary Pancreat Dis Int


  4 in total

Review 1.  Use of robotics in liver donor right hepatectomy.

Authors:  Po-Da Chen; Chao-Yin Wu; Yao-Ming Wu
Journal:  Hepatobiliary Surg Nutr       Date:  2017-10       Impact factor: 7.293

2.  Is there any difference between right hepatectomy and left lateral sectionectomy for living donors? as much you cut, as much you hurt?

Authors:  Klaus Steinbrück; Reinaldo Fernandes; Marcelo Enne; Jose Manoel Martinho; Jefferson Alves; Lúcio Filgueiras Pacheco-Moreira
Journal:  HPB (Oxford)       Date:  2010-12       Impact factor: 3.647

3.  Outcome comparison of right hepatectomy for living liver donation versus for hepatic patients without cirrhosis.

Authors:  Chuan Li; Kai Mi; Tian-fu Wen; Lu-nan Yan; Bo Li
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2011-03-05       Impact factor: 3.452

4.  Relationship between the risk of bile duct injury during laparoscopic cholecystectomy and the types of preoperative magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatiocography (MRCP).

Authors:  Yun Ho Chung; Doo Jin Kim; In-Gyu Kim; Han Jun Kim; Seong Eun Chon; Jang Yong Jeon; Jae Pil Jung; Jin Cheol Jeong; Joo Seop Kim; Eun Joo Yun
Journal:  Korean J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Surg       Date:  2012-02-29
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.