Literature DB >> 20006373

Improving spatial concentration estimates for nitrogen oxides using a hybrid meteorological dispersion/land use regression model in Los Angeles, CA and Seattle, WA.

Darren Wilton1, Adam Szpiro, Timothy Gould, Timothy Larson.   

Abstract

Predictions from a simple line source dispersion model, Caline3, were included as a covariate in a land use regression (LUR) model for NO(X)/NO(2) in Los Angeles, CA and Seattle, WA. The Caline3 model prediction assumed a unit emission factor for all roadway segments (1.0g/vehicle-mile). The NO(X) and/or NO(2) measurements for LA and Seattle were obtained from a comprehensive measurement campaign that is part of the Multi-Ethnic Study of Atherosclerosis Air Pollution Study (MESA Air). The measurement campaigns in both cities were approximately 2weeks in duration employing approximately 145 measurement sites in Greater LA and 26 sites in Seattle. The best "standard" LUR model (obtained without the inclusion of the Caline3 predictions) in LA had R(2) values of 0.53 for NO(X) and 0.74 for NO(2). The leave-one-out cross-validated R(2) values for NO(X) and NO(2) were 0.45 and 0.71, respectively. The equivalent "standard" NO(2) model for Seattle had an R(2) of 0.72 and a leave-one-out cross-validated R(2) of 0.63. When the Caline3 variable was included in the LA hybrid model, the R(2) values were 0.71 and 0.79 for NO(X) and NO(2), respectively. The corresponding cross-validated R(2) values were 0.66 and 0.77, for NOX and NO2, respectively. In Seattle, the inclusion of the Caline3 variable resulted in a NO(2) model with an R(2) of 0.81 and a corresponding cross-validated R(2) of 0.67. In LA, hybrid model performance was not affected by excluding roadways with annual average daily traffic volumes (AADT)<100,000. When the Caline3 predictions for heavy-duty trucks and lighter-duty vehicles were modelled as separate terms, the estimated fleet average NO(X) emission factors were 8.9 (SE=0.7) and 0.16 (SE=0.12) grams NO(X)/vehicle mile for heavy-duty and lighter-duty vehicles, respectively. These values are consistent with fleet average emission factors computed for LA with EMFAC 2007. Copyright 2009 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2009        PMID: 20006373     DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2009.11.033

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Sci Total Environ        ISSN: 0048-9697            Impact factor:   7.963


  12 in total

1.  Measurement error in two-stage analyses, with application to air pollution epidemiology.

Authors:  Adam A Szpiro; Christopher J Paciorek
Journal:  Environmetrics       Date:  2013-12-01       Impact factor: 1.900

2.  A Flexible Spatio-Temporal Model for Air Pollution with Spatial and Spatio-Temporal Covariates.

Authors:  Johan Lindström; Adam A Szpiro; Paul D Sampson; Assaf P Oron; Mark Richards; Tim V Larson; Lianne Sheppard
Journal:  Environ Ecol Stat       Date:  2014-09       Impact factor: 1.119

3.  Mining Public Datasets for Modeling Intra-City PM2.5 Concentrations at a Fine Spatial Resolution.

Authors:  Yijun Lin; Dimitrios Stripelis; Yao-Yi Chiang; José Luis Ambite; Rima Habre; Fan Pan; Sandrah P Eckel
Journal:  Proc ACM SIGSPATIAL Int Conf Adv Inf       Date:  2017-11

4.  Vascular responses to long- and short-term exposure to fine particulate matter: MESA Air (Multi-Ethnic Study of Atherosclerosis and Air Pollution).

Authors:  Ranjini M Krishnan; Sara D Adar; Adam A Szpiro; Neal W Jorgensen; Victor C Van Hee; R Graham Barr; Marie S O'Neill; David M Herrington; Joseph F Polak; Joel D Kaufman
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  2012-10-24       Impact factor: 24.094

5.  Neighborhood-Scale Spatial Models of Diesel Exhaust Concentration Profile Using 1-Nitropyrene and Other Nitroarenes.

Authors:  Jill K Schulte; Julie R Fox; Assaf P Oron; Timothy V Larson; Christopher D Simpson; Michael Paulsen; Nancy Beaudet; Joel D Kaufman; Sheryl Magzamen
Journal:  Environ Sci Technol       Date:  2015-11-06       Impact factor: 9.028

6.  Development of land use regression models for nitrogen dioxide, ultrafine particles, lung deposited surface area, and four other markers of particulate matter pollution in the Swiss SAPALDIA regions.

Authors:  Marloes Eeftens; Reto Meier; Christian Schindler; Inmaculada Aguilera; Harish Phuleria; Alex Ineichen; Mark Davey; Regina Ducret-Stich; Dirk Keidel; Nicole Probst-Hensch; Nino Künzli; Ming-Yi Tsai
Journal:  Environ Health       Date:  2016-04-18       Impact factor: 5.984

7.  Can dispersion modeling of air pollution be improved by land-use regression? An example from Stockholm, Sweden.

Authors:  Michal Korek; Christer Johansson; Nina Svensson; Tomas Lind; Rob Beelen; Gerard Hoek; Göran Pershagen; Tom Bellander
Journal:  J Expo Sci Environ Epidemiol       Date:  2016-08-03       Impact factor: 5.563

8.  Impact of Land Use on PM2.5 Pollution in a Representative City of Middle China.

Authors:  Haiou Yang; Wenbo Chen; Zhaofeng Liang
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2017-04-26       Impact factor: 3.390

9.  Characterizing spatial patterns of airborne coarse particulate (PM10-2.5) mass and chemical components in three cities: the multi-ethnic study of atherosclerosis.

Authors:  Kai Zhang; Timothy V Larson; Amanda Gassett; Adam A Szpiro; Martha Daviglus; Gregory L Burke; Joel D Kaufman; Sara D Adar
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  2014-03-18       Impact factor: 9.031

Review 10.  Design of an Air Pollution Monitoring Campaign in Beijing for Application to Cohort Health Studies.

Authors:  Sverre Vedal; Bin Han; Jia Xu; Adam Szpiro; Zhipeng Bai
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2017-12-15       Impact factor: 3.390

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.