OBJECTIVE: Due to imprecise clinical staging, the finding of extravesical and node-positive disease at the time of radical cystectomy (RC) for patients with clinically localized bladder cancer is not uncommon. Circulating tumor cells (CTCs) have been shown to be present in the peripheral blood of patients with metastatic urothelial carcinoma. The object of this study was to evaluate the ability of CTCs to predict extravesical disease in bladder cancer patients prior to RC. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Peripheral blood samples from 43 patients with bladder cancer were evaluated using the CellSearch (Veridex, LLC, Raritan, NJ) CTC assay prior to RC. The sensitivity, specificity, and positive predictive value (PPV) of CTC status in predicting extravesical disease was calculated. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves were generated to quantify the ability of CTCs to predict extravesical and node-positive disease. RESULTS: CTCs were detected in 9 (21%) patients prior to RC. The sensitivity, specificity, and PPV of CTC status in predicting extravesical disease were 27%, 88% and 78%, respectively. The accuracy of CTC status in predicting extravesical (≥pT3 or node-positive) disease for the entire cohort was 0.576. In a model incorporating preoperative hydronephrosis, CTC status did not improve the predictive accuracy for extravesical disease (0.576 vs. 0.585, P = 0.915). CONCLUSION: CTCs were detected in low numbers in a small percentage (21%) of patients prior to undergoing RC at our institution. CTC status was not a robust predictor of extravesical or node-positive disease in this cohort. CTC status is not likely to be a clinically useful parameter for directing therapeutic decisions in patients with ≤cT2 bladder cancer.
OBJECTIVE: Due to imprecise clinical staging, the finding of extravesical and node-positive disease at the time of radical cystectomy (RC) for patients with clinically localized bladder cancer is not uncommon. Circulating tumor cells (CTCs) have been shown to be present in the peripheral blood of patients with metastatic urothelial carcinoma. The object of this study was to evaluate the ability of CTCs to predict extravesical disease in bladder cancerpatients prior to RC. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Peripheral blood samples from 43 patients with bladder cancer were evaluated using the CellSearch (Veridex, LLC, Raritan, NJ) CTC assay prior to RC. The sensitivity, specificity, and positive predictive value (PPV) of CTC status in predicting extravesical disease was calculated. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves were generated to quantify the ability of CTCs to predict extravesical and node-positive disease. RESULTS: CTCs were detected in 9 (21%) patients prior to RC. The sensitivity, specificity, and PPV of CTC status in predicting extravesical disease were 27%, 88% and 78%, respectively. The accuracy of CTC status in predicting extravesical (≥pT3 or node-positive) disease for the entire cohort was 0.576. In a model incorporating preoperative hydronephrosis, CTC status did not improve the predictive accuracy for extravesical disease (0.576 vs. 0.585, P = 0.915). CONCLUSION: CTCs were detected in low numbers in a small percentage (21%) of patients prior to undergoing RC at our institution. CTC status was not a robust predictor of extravesical or node-positive disease in this cohort. CTC status is not likely to be a clinically useful parameter for directing therapeutic decisions in patients with ≤cT2 bladder cancer.
Authors: Michael Rink; Eugene K Cha; David Green; Jens Hansen; Brian D Robinson; Yair Lotan; Arthur I Sagalowsky; Felix K Chun; Pierre I Karakiewicz; Margit Fisch; Douglas S Scherr; Shahrokh F Shariat Journal: Curr Urol Rep Date: 2012-04 Impact factor: 3.092
Authors: Thomas W Flaig; Shandra Wilson; Adrie van Bokhoven; Marileila Varella-Garcia; Pamela Wolfe; Paul Maroni; E Erin Genova; Diana Morales; M Scott Lucia Journal: Urology Date: 2011-08-02 Impact factor: 2.649
Authors: M May; M Burger; S Brookman-May; W Otto; J Peter; O Rud; H-M Fritsche; C Bolenz; L Trojan; E Herrmann; M S Michel; C Wülfing; R Moritz; A Tiemann; S C Müller; J Ellinger; A Buchner; C G Stief; D Tilki; W F Wieland; C Gilfrich; T Höfner; M Hohenfellner; A Haferkamp; J Roigas; P Bretschneider-Ehrenberg; O Müller; M Zacharias; S Gunia; P J Bastian Journal: Urologe A Date: 2011-06 Impact factor: 0.639
Authors: Melody Ju; Gary D Kao; David Steinmetz; Sanjay Chandrasekaran; Stephen M Keefe; Thomas J Guzzo; John P Christodouleas; Stephen M Hahn; Jay F Dorsey Journal: Cancer Biol Ther Date: 2014-03-11 Impact factor: 4.742
Authors: Martin Cegan; Katarina Kolostova; Rafal Matkowski; Marek Broul; Jan Schraml; Marek Fiutowski; Vladimir Bobek Journal: Int J Clin Exp Pathol Date: 2014-09-15