Yun-Fan Sun1, Xin-Rong Yang, Jian Zhou, Shuang-Jian Qiu, Jia Fan, Yang Xu. 1. Key Laboratory of Carcinogenesis and Cancer Invasion (Ministry of Education), Liver Cancer Institute, Zhong Shan Hospital, Fudan University, 136 Yi Xue Yuan Road, Shanghai 200032, People's Republic of China.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Circulating tumor cells (CTCs) have long been considered a reflection of tumor aggressiveness. Hematogenous spreading of CTCs from a primary tumor is a crucial step in the metastasis cascade, which leads ultimately to the formation of overt metastases. However, owing to the rarity of CTCs in peripheral blood, detecting these cells requires methods combined with high sensitivity and specificity, which sets tremendous challenges for the implementation of these assays into clinical routine. METHODS: Generally, CTCs detection methods are composed of the following two steps: enrichment (isolation) process (morphological and immunological techniques) and detection (identification) process (cytometric and nucleic acid techniques), which may or may not be separate from enrichment. Genetic and molecular characterization of CTCs carried out by fluorescent in situ hybridization (FISH), comparative genomic hybridization (CGH), PCR-based techniques, and biomarker immunofluorescent staining extract more information about malignant profile, metastatic potential of CTCs, and the extent to which CTCs are genetically identical to the primary tumor. RESULTS: Recent technical advances made it possible to detect CTCs. The efficacy of circulating tumor cell (CTC) detection among patients with solid malignancy has been investigated, which shows great potential to become a tool for real-time parameter of prognosis and serve as an early marker to assess the therapeutic response in overt cancers. Improvements in detection and characterization of CTCs will hopefully lead to refinement of clinical management of cancer patients. CONCLUSION: This review addresses the majority of assays that have been published thus far, including the enrichment and detection steps and the markers used in these assays, accompanied by some biological issues of CTC and the results of clinical application harvested.
BACKGROUND: Circulating tumor cells (CTCs) have long been considered a reflection of tumor aggressiveness. Hematogenous spreading of CTCs from a primary tumor is a crucial step in the metastasis cascade, which leads ultimately to the formation of overt metastases. However, owing to the rarity of CTCs in peripheral blood, detecting these cells requires methods combined with high sensitivity and specificity, which sets tremendous challenges for the implementation of these assays into clinical routine. METHODS: Generally, CTCs detection methods are composed of the following two steps: enrichment (isolation) process (morphological and immunological techniques) and detection (identification) process (cytometric and nucleic acid techniques), which may or may not be separate from enrichment. Genetic and molecular characterization of CTCs carried out by fluorescent in situ hybridization (FISH), comparative genomic hybridization (CGH), PCR-based techniques, and biomarker immunofluorescent staining extract more information about malignant profile, metastatic potential of CTCs, and the extent to which CTCs are genetically identical to the primary tumor. RESULTS: Recent technical advances made it possible to detect CTCs. The efficacy of circulating tumor cell (CTC) detection among patients with solid malignancy has been investigated, which shows great potential to become a tool for real-time parameter of prognosis and serve as an early marker to assess the therapeutic response in overt cancers. Improvements in detection and characterization of CTCs will hopefully lead to refinement of clinical management of cancerpatients. CONCLUSION: This review addresses the majority of assays that have been published thus far, including the enrichment and detection steps and the markers used in these assays, accompanied by some biological issues of CTC and the results of clinical application harvested.
Authors: Shannon L Stott; Richard J Lee; Sunitha Nagrath; Min Yu; David T Miyamoto; Lindsey Ulkus; Elizabeth J Inserra; Matthew Ulman; Simeon Springer; Zev Nakamura; Alessandra L Moore; Dina I Tsukrov; Maria E Kempner; Douglas M Dahl; Chin-Lee Wu; A John Iafrate; Matthew R Smith; Ronald G Tompkins; Lecia V Sequist; Mehmet Toner; Daniel A Haber; Shyamala Maheswaran Journal: Sci Transl Med Date: 2010-03-31 Impact factor: 17.956
Authors: Kazuo Koyanagi; Anton J Bilchik; Sukamal Saha; Roderick R Turner; David Wiese; Martin McCarter; Perry Shen; Linda Deacon; David Elashoff; Dave S B Hoon Journal: Clin Cancer Res Date: 2008-11-15 Impact factor: 12.531
Authors: I Van der Auwera; D Peeters; I H Benoy; H J Elst; S J Van Laere; A Prové; H Maes; P Huget; P van Dam; P B Vermeulen; L Y Dirix Journal: Br J Cancer Date: 2009-12-01 Impact factor: 7.640
Authors: Johann S de Bono; Howard I Scher; R Bruce Montgomery; Christopher Parker; M Craig Miller; Henk Tissing; Gerald V Doyle; Leon W W M Terstappen; Kenneth J Pienta; Derek Raghavan Journal: Clin Cancer Res Date: 2008-10-01 Impact factor: 12.531
Authors: Vasudha Murlidhar; Rishindra M Reddy; Shamileh Fouladdel; Lili Zhao; Martin K Ishikawa; Svetlana Grabauskiene; Zhuo Zhang; Jules Lin; Andrew C Chang; Philip Carrott; William R Lynch; Mark B Orringer; Chandan Kumar-Sinha; Nallasivam Palanisamy; David G Beer; Max S Wicha; Nithya Ramnath; Ebrahim Azizi; Sunitha Nagrath Journal: Cancer Res Date: 2017-07-17 Impact factor: 12.701
Authors: M Thalgott; M M Heck; M Eiber; M Souvatzoglou; G Hatzichristodoulou; V Kehl; B J Krause; B Rack; M Retz; J E Gschwend; U Andergassen; R Nawroth Journal: J Cancer Res Clin Oncol Date: 2015-02-24 Impact factor: 4.553
Authors: Ivonne Nel; Hideo A Baba; Judith Ertle; Frank Weber; Barbara Sitek; Martin Eisenacher; Helmut E Meyer; Joerg F Schlaak; Andreas-Claudius Hoffmann Journal: Transl Oncol Date: 2013-08-01 Impact factor: 4.243
Authors: Mark Thalgott; Brigitte Rack; Tobias Maurer; Michael Souvatzoglou; Matthias Eiber; Veronika Kreß; Matthias M Heck; Ulrich Andergassen; Roman Nawroth; Jürgen E Gschwend; Margitta Retz Journal: J Cancer Res Clin Oncol Date: 2013-01-29 Impact factor: 4.553
Authors: Gennaro Galizia; Marica Gemei; Michele Orditura; Ciro Romano; Anna Zamboli; Paolo Castellano; Andrea Mabilia; Annamaria Auricchio; Ferdinando De Vita; Luigi Del Vecchio; Eva Lieto Journal: J Gastrointest Surg Date: 2013-06-28 Impact factor: 3.452