Literature DB >> 20005033

Predictive factors for outcome of invasive video-EEG monitoring and subsequent resective surgery in patients with refractory epilepsy.

Evelien Carrette1, Kristl Vonck, Veerle De Herdt, Annelies Van Dycke, Riëm El Tahry, Alfred Meurs, Robrecht Raedt, Lut Goossens, Michel Van Zandijcke, Georges Van Maele, Vijay Thadani, Wytse Wadman, Dirk Van Roost, Paul Boon.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: This is a descriptive study of patients who underwent invasive video-EEG monitoring (IVEM) at Ghent University Hospital. The aim of the study is to identify predictive factors for outcome of IVEM and resective surgery (RS). These factors may optimize the patient flow following the non-invasive presurgical evaluation towards IVEM and RS or other treatments. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Over the past 16 years, 68/710 refractory epilepsy patients included in the presurgical evaluation protocol (M/F 41/27, mean age 33 years) underwent IVEM at Ghent University Hospital. Patient features and follow-up data were collected from the patients' medical files and the electronic patient database at the neurology and neurosurgery department. Predictive factors for IVEM outcome were identified by comparing features of patients with a positive IVEM outcome (i.e. ictal onset zone identification) and patients with a negative IVEM outcome. Predictive factors for RS outcome were identified by comparing features of patients with Engel class I and patients with Engel class II-IV outcome.
RESULTS: In 56/68 patients (82%) IVEM outcome was positive. The occurrence of a seizure-free interval in the patient's history and a non-localizing ictal scalp EEG in patients with a structural abnormality on MRI (p<0.05) were predictive factors for a negative IVEM outcome. 32/68 patients underwent RS. In 22/32 (70%) patients RS resulted in an Engel class I outcome. A structural abnormality on MRI was a predictive factor for a positive RS outcome in patients in whom a focal or regional focus was resected (p<0.05).
CONCLUSION: This study shows that IVEM identifies one or more ictal onset zone(s) in up to 80% of patients. The potential of IVEM to identify the ictal onset zone is unlikely in patients with a seizure-free interval in their medical history and a non-localizing ictal scalp EEG during the non-invasive presurgical evaluation. Half of these patients underwent RS with long-term seizure freedom in 70%. Patients with structural MRI lesions have the highest chance of seizure freedom. These findings may contribute to the optimization of patient management during both the invasive and non-invasive presurgical work-up. 2009 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 20005033     DOI: 10.1016/j.clineuro.2009.10.017

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Neurol Neurosurg        ISSN: 0303-8467            Impact factor:   1.876


  10 in total

Review 1.  [Invasive stimulation procedures and EEG diagnostics in epilepsy].

Authors:  A Schulze-Bonhage; H M Hamer; M Hirsch; M Hagge
Journal:  Nervenarzt       Date:  2016-08       Impact factor: 1.214

Review 2.  Stereo-Encephalographic Presurgical Evaluation of Temporal Lobe Epilepsy: An Evolving Science.

Authors:  Elma Paredes-Aragon; Norah A AlKhaldi; Daniel Ballesteros-Herrera; Seyed M Mirsattari
Journal:  Front Neurol       Date:  2022-05-27       Impact factor: 4.086

3.  Outcome after individualized stereoelectroencephalography (sEEG) implantation and navigated resection in patients with lesional and non-lesional focal epilepsy.

Authors:  Jun Thorsteinsdottir; Christian Vollmar; Jörg-Christian Tonn; Friedrich-Wilhelm Kreth; Soheyl Noachtar; Aurelia Peraud
Journal:  J Neurol       Date:  2019-01-30       Impact factor: 4.849

Review 4.  Do neuroimaging results impact prognosis of epilepsy surgery? A meta-analysis.

Authors:  Zhuo-Ran Yin; Hui-Cong Kang; Wei Wu; Min Wang; Sui-Qiang Zhu
Journal:  J Huazhong Univ Sci Technolog Med Sci       Date:  2013-04-17

Review 5.  How to establish causality in epilepsy surgery.

Authors:  Eishi Asano; Erik C Brown; Csaba Juhász
Journal:  Brain Dev       Date:  2013-05-15       Impact factor: 1.961

Review 6.  New Techniques and Progress in Epilepsy Surgery.

Authors:  Robert A McGovern; Garrett P Banks; Guy M McKhann
Journal:  Curr Neurol Neurosci Rep       Date:  2016-07       Impact factor: 5.081

7.  An evaluation of kurtosis beamforming in magnetoencephalography to localize the epileptogenic zone in drug resistant epilepsy patients.

Authors:  Michael B H Hall; Ida A Nissen; Elisabeth C W van Straaten; Paul L Furlong; Caroline Witton; Elaine Foley; Stefano Seri; Arjan Hillebrand
Journal:  Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  2018-03-09       Impact factor: 3.708

8.  Influence of Time-Series Normalization, Number of Nodes, Connectivity and Graph Measure Selection on Seizure-Onset Zone Localization from Intracranial EEG.

Authors:  Pieter van Mierlo; Octavian Lie; Willeke Staljanssens; Ana Coito; Serge Vulliémoz
Journal:  Brain Topogr       Date:  2018-04-26       Impact factor: 3.020

9.  Surgical Outcomes and EEG Prognostic Factors After Stereotactic Laser Amygdalohippocampectomy for Mesial Temporal Lobe Epilepsy.

Authors:  Shasha Wu; Naoum P Issa; Maureen Lacy; David Satzer; Sandra L Rose; Carina W Yang; John M Collins; Xi Liu; Taixin Sun; Vernon L Towle; Douglas R Nordli; Peter C Warnke; James X Tao
Journal:  Front Neurol       Date:  2021-05-17       Impact factor: 4.003

10.  Long-term seizure outcome following resective surgery for epilepsy: to be or not to be completely cured?

Authors:  Takeharu Kunieda; Nobuhiro Mikuni; Sumiya Shibata; Rika Inano; Yukihiro Yamao; Takayuki Kikuchi; Riki Matsumoto; Jun Takahashi; Akio Ikeda; Hidenao Fukuyama; Susumu Miyamoto
Journal:  Neurol Med Chir (Tokyo)       Date:  2013-10-21       Impact factor: 1.742

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.