Literature DB >> 20004052

Photodynamic diagnosis in non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer: a systematic review and cumulative analysis of prospective studies.

Ingo Kausch1, Martin Sommerauer, Francesco Montorsi, Arnulf Stenzl, Didier Jacqmin, Patrice Jichlinski, Dieter Jocham, Andreas Ziegler, Reinhard Vonthein.   

Abstract

CONTEXT: The clinical benefit of photodynamic diagnosis (PDD) with 5-aminolevulinic acid or hexaminolevulinate in addition to white-light cystoscopy (WLC) in bladder cancer has been discussed controversially.
OBJECTIVE: To assess in a systematic review the effect of PDD in addition to WLC on (1) the diagnosis and (2) the therapeutic outcome of primary or recurrent non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer investigated by cystoscopy or transurethral resection. EVIDENCE ACQUISITION: An electronic database search of Medline, Embase, the Cochrane Library, and CancerLit was undertaken, plus hand searching of relevant congress abstracts and urologic journals. Trials were included if they prospectively compared WLC with PDD in bladder cancer. The review process followed the guidelines of the Cochrane Collaboration. Two reviewers evaluated independently both trial eligibility and methodological quality and data extraction. EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS: The primary end point of diagnostic accuracy was additional detection rate. The primary end points of therapeutic outcome were residual tumour at second resection and recurrence-free survival (RFS). Seventeen trials were identified. Twelve diagnostic trials used WLC and PDD with the same patients. Seven reported results for the subgroup of patients with carcinoma in situ (CIS). Five randomised trials studied therapeutic outcome. The results were combined in random effects meta-analyses if end points, designs, and populations were comparable. Twenty percent (95% confidence interval [CI], 8-35) more tumour-positive patients were detected with PDD in all patients with non-muscle-invasive tumours and 39% (CI, 23-57) more when only CIS was analysed. Heterogeneity was present among diagnostic studies even when the subgroup of patients with CIS was investigated. Residual tumour was significantly less often found after PDD (odds ratio: 0.28; 95% CI, 0.15-0.52; p<0.0001). RFS was higher at 12 and 24 mo in the PDD groups than in the WLC-only groups. The combined p value of log-rank tests of RFS was statistically significant (0.00002).
CONCLUSIONS: PDD detects more bladder tumour-positive patients, especially more with CIS, than WLC. More patients have a complete resection and a longer RFS when diagnosed with PDD.
Copyright © 2009 European Association of Urology. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2009        PMID: 20004052     DOI: 10.1016/j.eururo.2009.11.041

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Urol        ISSN: 0302-2838            Impact factor:   20.096


  59 in total

1.  Systematic support for photodynamic diagnosis.

Authors:  Suzanne J Farley
Journal:  Nat Rev Urol       Date:  2010-04       Impact factor: 14.432

2.  A comparison of hexaminolevulinate (Hexvix(®)) fluorescence cystoscopy and white-light cystoscopy for detection of bladder cancer: results of the HeRo observational study.

Authors:  Alberto Lapini; Andrea Minervini; Alberto Masala; Luigi Schips; Armin Pycha; Luca Cindolo; Riccardo Giannella; Thomas Martini; Gianni Vittori; Danilo Zani; Fania Bellomo; Sergio Cosciani Cunico
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2012-06-23       Impact factor: 4.584

Review 3.  Defining and treating the spectrum of intermediate risk nonmuscle invasive bladder cancer.

Authors:  Ashish M Kamat; J Alfred Witjes; Maurizio Brausi; Mark Soloway; Donald Lamm; Raj Persad; Roger Buckley; Andreas Böhle; Marc Colombel; Joan Palou
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2014-03-25       Impact factor: 7.450

Review 4.  Emerging endoscopic imaging technologies for bladder cancer detection.

Authors:  Aristeo Lopez; Joseph C Liao
Journal:  Curr Urol Rep       Date:  2014-05       Impact factor: 3.092

Review 5.  Fluorescence Imaging for Cancer Screening and Surveillance.

Authors:  K E Tipirneni; E L Rosenthal; L S Moore; A D Haskins; N Udayakumar; A H Jani; W R Carroll; A B Morlandt; M Bogyo; J Rao; Jason M Warram
Journal:  Mol Imaging Biol       Date:  2017-10       Impact factor: 3.488

Review 6.  The Impact of Blue Light Cystoscopy on the Diagnosis and Treatment of Bladder Cancer.

Authors:  Eugene J Pietzak
Journal:  Curr Urol Rep       Date:  2017-05       Impact factor: 3.092

Review 7.  [Systemic treatment of bladder cancer].

Authors:  M Haas; M Burger; M J Schnabel
Journal:  Urologe A       Date:  2021-05-27       Impact factor: 0.639

8.  [Quality of care in patients with newly diagnosed bladder cancer: a prospective assessment in northern Germany].

Authors:  C Reek; M Rink; M Bloch; J Hansen; F K Chun; A Schneider; J Busche; M Fisch
Journal:  Urologe A       Date:  2013-07       Impact factor: 0.639

Review 9.  [Supplementary optical techniques for the detection of nonmuscle invasive bladder cancer].

Authors:  S Aeishen; Y Dawood; S Papadoukakis; M Horstmann
Journal:  Urologe A       Date:  2018-02       Impact factor: 0.639

Review 10.  High-risk non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer: update for a better identification and treatment.

Authors:  Oscar Rodriguez Faba; Joan Palou; Alberto Breda; H Villavicencio
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2012-10-16       Impact factor: 4.226

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.