| Literature DB >> 20003339 |
Chunmin Wang1, William F Swanson, Jason R Herrick, Kiho Lee, Zoltan Machaty.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Somatic cell nuclear transfer in cats offers a useful tool for the generation of valuable research models. However, low birth rates after nuclear transfer hamper exploitation of the full potential of the technology. Poor embryo development after activation of the reconstructed oocytes seems to be responsible, at least in part, for the low efficiency. The objective of this study was to characterize the response of cat oocytes to various stimuli in order to fine-tune existing and possibly develop new activation methods for the generation of cat disease models by somatic cell nuclear transfer.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2009 PMID: 20003339 PMCID: PMC2797514 DOI: 10.1186/1477-7827-7-148
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Reprod Biol Endocrinol ISSN: 1477-7827 Impact factor: 5.211
Figure 1Changes in the [Ca. The upper part of each section shows cytoplasmic free Ca2+ levels as detected by a photometer; the arrows indicate the time when the stimulus was applied. In the lower part of each section images of [Ca2+ ]i changes in individual cat oocytes are shown; different colors indicate different intracellular free Ca2+ concentrations.
Characteristics of [Ca2+ ]i changes (mean ± SEM) induced by various artificial stimuli
| Treatment | No. of oocytes (No. of responses) | Time till response (sec) | Peak | Duration (sec) | Oscillation | Interval between peaks (sec) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Electroporation | 15 (15) | 3 ± 0.4 | 485 ± 28 | 73 ± 15 | No | -- |
| 7% ethanol | 5 (12) | 110 ± 31 | 394 ± 87 | 150 ± 41 | No | -- |
| 5 μM ionomycin | 5 (5) | 18 ± 2 | 277 ± 27 | >800 | No | -- |
| 50 μM ionomycin | 5 (5) | 6 ± 1 | 336 ± 12 | >800 | No | -- |
| 200 μM thimerosal | 15 (18) | 365 ± 51 | 496 ± 75 | 85 ± 8 | Yes | 351 ± 30 |
| 20 mM SrCl2 | 15 (15) | 85 ± 10 | 431 ± 52 | 335 ± 28 | No | -- |
| Na+-free medium | 15 (28) | 135 ± 24 | 639 ± 79 | 1470 ± 242 | No | -- |
Figure 2Pronuclear formation in cat oocytes activated by electroporation (EP), thimerosal/DTT (Thi/DTT), SrCl. The asterisk indicates a significant difference (P < 0.05) between frequencies of pronuclear formation achieved with and without CHX/Cyto B supplementation. Different lowercase letters indicate significant differences between treatments without CHX/Cyto B supplementation (P < 0.05); different uppercase letters indicate significant differences between treatments that were followed by CHX/Cyto B incubation (P < 0.05).
Figure 3Cleavage development of embryos after activation by electroporation (EP), thimerosal/DTT (Thi/DTT), SrCl. The asterisks indicate significant differences (P < 0.05) between cleavage frequencies achieved with and without CHX/Cyto B supplementation. Different lowercase letters indicate significant differences between treatments without CHX/Cyto B supplementation (P < 0.05); different uppercase letters indicate significant differences between treatments where the Ca2+ signal-inducing stimulus was followed by CHX/Cyto B incubation (P < 0.05).
Figure 4Blastocyst formation induced by parthenogenetic activation of cat oocytes. The asterisks indicate significant differences (P < 0.05) between frequencies of blastocyst formation achieved with and without CHX/Cyto B supplementation. Different lowercase letters indicate significant differences between treatments without CHX/Cyto B supplementation; different uppercase letters indicate significant differences between treatments followed by CHX/Cyto B incubation (P < 0.05).
Development of reconstructed cat oocytes activated by electroporation or thimerosal/DTT.
| Donor Cell type | Activation treatment | Embryos produced | Embryos cleaved and transferred (%) | Recipients | Pregnant recipients | Implantation sites (%) | No. of fetuses (%) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MPS | Electroporation | 157 | 114 (72.6) | 9 | 2* | 4 (3.5) | 3 (2.6) |
| AMD | Electroporation | 73 | 62 (84.9) | 6 | 2 | 4 (6.5) | 2 (3.2) |
| AMD | Thimerosal/DTT | 57 | 44 (77.2) | 4 | 0 | 0 (0) | 0 (0) |
Stimulated oocytes in both cases were subsequently incubated in cycloheximide and cytochalasin B for 4 h.
*A third female had a single implantation site but with no observable fetus