Literature DB >> 20003147

Simplifying jackknifing of ERPs and getting more out of it: retrieving estimates of participants' latencies.

Fren T Y Smulders1.   

Abstract

Abstract Research has demonstrated that the jackknifing procedure for estimating ERP latencies (J. Miller, T. Patterson, & R. Ulrich, 1998) yields more accurate estimates of differences between experimental conditions in ERP latency than other methods. However, the scores resulting from this procedure require special adjustments for further analyses and do not directly reflect each participant's latency. Here, a simple transform is proposed that retrieves estimates of each participant's latency from the subaverage scores, rendering further adjustments superfluous. Other advantages of working with participants' latencies are discussed. Results of simulations support the validity of jackknifing and the retrieval transform.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 20003147     DOI: 10.1111/j.1469-8986.2009.00934.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychophysiology        ISSN: 0048-5772            Impact factor:   4.016


  15 in total

1.  Electrophysiological evidence for age effects on sensory memory processing of tonal patterns.

Authors:  Johanna Rimmele; Elyse Sussman; Christian Keitel; Thomas Jacobsen; Erich Schröger
Journal:  Psychol Aging       Date:  2011-08-08

2.  Neural time course and brain sources of facial attractiveness vs. trustworthiness judgment.

Authors:  Manuel G Calvo; Aida Gutiérrez-García; David Beltrán
Journal:  Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci       Date:  2018-12       Impact factor: 3.282

3.  LRP predicts smooth pursuit eye movement onset during the ocular tracking of self-generated movements.

Authors:  Jing Chen; Matteo Valsecchi; Karl R Gegenfurtner
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2016-03-23       Impact factor: 2.714

4.  How many trials does it take to get a significant ERP effect? It depends.

Authors:  Megan A Boudewyn; Steven J Luck; Jaclyn L Farrens; Emily S Kappenman
Journal:  Psychophysiology       Date:  2017-12-20       Impact factor: 4.016

5.  Spatial release from informational masking enhances the early cortical representation of speech sounds.

Authors:  Benjamin H Zobel; Richard L Freyman; Lisa D Sanders
Journal:  Audit Percept Cogn       Date:  2022-06-14

6.  Automatic motor activation by mere instruction.

Authors:  Tom Everaert; Marijke Theeuwes; Baptist Liefooghe; Jan De Houwer
Journal:  Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci       Date:  2014-12       Impact factor: 3.526

7.  Processing of complex distracting sounds in school-aged children and adults: evidence from EEG and MEG data.

Authors:  Philipp Ruhnau; Björn Herrmann; Burkhard Maess; Jens Brauer; Angela D Friederici; Erich Schröger
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2013-10-21

8.  Separate and concurrent symbolic predictions of sound features are processed differently.

Authors:  Marika Pieszek; Erich Schröger; Andreas Widmann
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2014-11-18

9.  Estimating the Timing of Cognitive Operations With MEG/EEG Latency Measures: A Primer, a Brief Tutorial, and an Implementation of Various Methods.

Authors:  Heinrich René Liesefeld
Journal:  Front Neurosci       Date:  2018-10-25       Impact factor: 4.677

10.  Neural Responses and Perceptual Sensitivity to Sound Depend on Sound-Level Statistics.

Authors:  Björn Herrmann; Thomas Augereau; Ingrid S Johnsrude
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2020-06-12       Impact factor: 4.379

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.