Literature DB >> 20001493

Carcinoma of the nasal cavity and paranasal sinuses in Denmark 1995-2004.

Christian Thorup1, Lars Sebbesen, Hella Danø, Michael Leetmaa, M Andersen, Christian Buchwald, Claus A Kristensen, Jens Bentzen, Christian Godballe, Jørgen Johansen, Cai Grau.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the treatment outcome for sino-nasal carcinomas in Denmark from 1995-2004 and compare the results to the previous Danish survey covering 1982-1991.
DESIGN: Retrospective follow-up.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: In the five Danish head and neck oncology centres, charts of all consecutive patients with sino-nasal carcinomas were reviewed and data extracted to a common database. Altogether 242 patients from the period 1995-2004 were identified. Of these 162 (67%) were male and 80 (33%) female. Histologies included squamous cell carcinoma (55%), adenocarcinoma (28.5%), adenoid-cystic carcinoma (5.0%), undifferentiated carcinoma (4.5%), transitiocellular carcinoma (1.7%), mucoepidermoid carcinoma (0.8%), neuroendocrine carcinoma (2.5%), small cell carcinomas (1.2%) and carcinomas not otherwise specified (0.8%). Treatments included radiotherapy alone 79 (33%), surgery alone 29 (12%), combined surgery and radiotherapy 96 (40%), palliative/no treatment 38 (16%). A total of 204 (86%) patients were treated with curative intent.
RESULTS: Of the 204 patients treated with curative intent, 94 (46%) relapsed. Most failures were in T-site (63, 30%). N-site failures were 10 (5%) and M-site failures six (3%). Failure occurring in T+N-site, T+M-site, N+M-site and T+N+M-site were seven (3%), two (1%), one (0.5%) and five (3%) respectively. The 5-year actuarial local, nodal and loco-regional control rates were 55 + or - 4%, 86 + or - 3%, 49 + or - 4%, respectively. The overall 5-year actuarial survival rate for the entire cohort was 47 + or - 3%, and the corresponding cancer-specific 5-year actuarial survival rate was 57 + or - 3%. Female gender, nasal cavity tumour, adenocarcinoma and low clinical stage were significant positive prognostic factors in univariate analysis. A Cox multivariate analysis showed that only tumour site and clinical stage were independent significant prognostic factors.
CONCLUSION: The current series has confirmed stage and tumour site as independent prognostic factors. Compared to the previous Danish survey covering the period 1982-1991, the overall survival and cancer-specific survival rates have improved significantly.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20001493     DOI: 10.3109/02841860903428176

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acta Oncol        ISSN: 0284-186X            Impact factor:   4.089


  17 in total

1.  Sinonasal tract mucoepidermoid carcinoma: a clinicopathologic and immunophenotypic study of 19 cases combined with a comprehensive review of the literature.

Authors:  Erica B Wolfish; Brenda L Nelson; Lester D R Thompson
Journal:  Head Neck Pathol       Date:  2011-12-20

Review 2.  Multimodal Therapy for Sinonasal Malignancies: Updates and Review of Current Treatment.

Authors:  Mayur D Mody; Nabil F Saba
Journal:  Curr Treat Options Oncol       Date:  2020-01-16

3.  A national series of 244 sinonasal cancers in Finland in 1990-2004.

Authors:  Petri Koivunen; Antti A Mäkitie; Leif Bäck; Matti Pukkila; Jussi Laranne; Ilpo Kinnunen; Kalle Aitasalo; Reidar Grénman
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2011-05-18       Impact factor: 2.503

4.  [Sinonasal tract malignancies : a 14-year single institution experience].

Authors:  A Schröck; F Göke; T van Bremen; R Kirsten; M Jakob; T Ehrenberg; M Kühnemund; A Gerstner; K W G Eichhorn
Journal:  HNO       Date:  2012-12       Impact factor: 1.284

5.  Sinonasal Neoplasia - Clinicopathological Profile And Importance of Computed Tomography.

Authors:  Jaiganesh Sivalingam; Radha Sarawagi; Sameer Raghuwanshi; Pankaj Kumar Yadav
Journal:  J Clin Diagn Res       Date:  2015-04-08

6.  Sinonasal tract and nasopharyngeal adenoid cystic carcinoma: a clinicopathologic and immunophenotypic study of 86 cases.

Authors:  Lester D R Thompson; Carla Penner; Ngoc J Ho; Robert D Foss; Markku Miettinen; Jacqueline A Wieneke; Christopher A Moskaluk; Edward B Stelow
Journal:  Head Neck Pathol       Date:  2013-09-15

Review 7.  Rare Diseases of the Nose, the Paranasal Sinuses, and the Anterior Skull Base.

Authors:  Fabian Sommer
Journal:  Laryngorhinootologie       Date:  2021-04-30       Impact factor: 1.057

8.  The CT and MRI observations of small cell neuroendocrine carcinoma in paranasal sinuses.

Authors:  Qingqiang Zhu; Wenrong Zhu; Jingtao Wu; Hongying Zhang
Journal:  World J Surg Oncol       Date:  2015-02-15       Impact factor: 2.754

Review 9.  Imaging of sinonasal tumours.

Authors:  Heidi B Eggesbø
Journal:  Cancer Imaging       Date:  2012-05-07       Impact factor: 3.909

10.  Comparison of MRI and CT in the Evaluation of Unilateral Maxillary Sinus Opacification.

Authors:  Elise Chua; Annakan V Navaratnam; Dominic St Leger; Vincent Lam; Samit Unadkat; Alexander Weller
Journal:  Radiol Res Pract       Date:  2021-07-09
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.