Literature DB >> 19999951

Comprehensive cancer control-research & development: knowing what we do and doing what we know.

Jon F Kerner1, Eduardo Cazap, Derek Yach, Marco A Pierotti, Maria Grazia Daidone, Pasquale de Blasio, Peter Geary, Brent Schacter, Milena Sant, J Dik F Habbema, Rengaswamy Sankaranarayanan, Catherine Sutcliffe, Simon Sutcliffe.   

Abstract

Comprehensive cancer control is defined as an integrated and coordinated approach to reducing cancer incidence, morbidity, and mortality across the cancer control continuum from primary prevention to end-of-life care. This approach assumes that when the public sector, non-governmental organizations, academia, and the private sector share with each other their skills, knowledge, and resources, a country can take advantage of all its talents and resources to more quickly reduce the burden of cancer for all its population. One critical issue for comprehensive cancer control is the extent to which the private sector can contribute to cancer prevention and control programs and policies that have historically been lead by the public health sector, and similarly how can the public sector increase its investment and involvement in clinical research and practice issues that are largely driven by the private sector worldwide? In addition, building capacity to integrate research that is appropriate to the culture and context of the population will be important in different settings, in particular research related to cancer control interventions that have the capacity to influence outcomes. To whatever extent cancer control research is ultimately funded through the private and public sectors, if investments in research discoveries are ultimately to benefit the populations that bear the greatest burden of disease, then new approaches to integrating the lessons learned from science with the lessons learned from service (public health, clinical, and public policy) must be found to close the gap between what we know and what we do. Communities of practice for international cancer control, like the ones fostered by the first three International Cancer Control Congresses, represent an important forum for knowledge exchange opportunities to accelerate the translation of new knowledge into action to reduce the burden of cancer worldwide.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19999951     DOI: 10.1177/030089160909500504

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Tumori        ISSN: 0300-8916


  4 in total

1.  Reducing cancer disparities through community engagement in policy development: the role of cancer councils.

Authors:  Michael A Preston; Glen P Mays; Rise' D Jones; Sharla A Smith; Chara N Stewart; Ronda S Henry-Tillman
Journal:  J Health Care Poor Underserved       Date:  2014-02

2.  Promoting state health department evidence-based cancer and chronic disease prevention: a multi-phase dissemination study with a cluster randomized trial component.

Authors:  Peg Allen; Sonia Sequeira; Rebekah R Jacob; Adriano Akira Ferreira Hino; Katherine A Stamatakis; Jenine K Harris; Lindsay Elliott; Jon F Kerner; Ellen Jones; Maureen Dobbins; Elizabeth A Baker; Ross C Brownson
Journal:  Implement Sci       Date:  2013-12-13       Impact factor: 7.327

3.  Health Equity and Colorectal Cancer Awareness: a Community Health Educator Initiative.

Authors:  Michael A Preston; Debbie Cadet; Rachel Hunley; Reuben Retnam; Sarah Arezo; Vanessa B Sheppard
Journal:  J Cancer Educ       Date:  2021-10-22       Impact factor: 2.037

4.  A qualitative exploration of contextual factors that influence dissemination and implementation of evidence-based chronic disease prevention across four countries.

Authors:  Elizabeth L Budd; Anna J deRuyter; Zhaoxin Wang; Pauline Sung-Chan; Xiangji Ying; Karishma S Furtado; Tahna Pettman; Rebecca Armstrong; Rodrigo S Reis; Jianwei Shi; Tabitha Mui; Tahnee Saunders; Leonardo Becker; Ross C Brownson
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2018-04-02       Impact factor: 2.655

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.