Literature DB >> 19997754

Early experience in human hybrid transgastric and transvaginal endoscopic cholecystectomy.

Gustavo Salinas1, Lil Saavedra, Hellen Agurto, Rosa Quispe, Edwin Ramírez, José Grande, Juan Tamayo, Victoria Sánchez, Daniel Málaga, Jeffrey M Marks.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Abdominal procedures have been performed for a long time through the anterior abdominal wall. Since the first reports in the 1980s, laparoscopy has become the standard for cholecystectomy, with many advantages over open procedures. Now a natural-orifice approach to the peritoneal cavity may further reduce the invasiveness of surgery by either diminishing or avoiding abdominal incisions. Several orifice routes to the abdominal cavity have been described: transgastric, transvaginal, transvesical, and transcolonic. Although most experiences with the porcine model showed the possibility of these approaches, few surgeons reported experiences with humans. The authors present their complete early experience with transgastric (TG) and transvaginal (TV) cholecystectomies in human beings.
METHODS: Thirty-nine patients (4 males and 35 females) underwent hybrid NOTES procedures from January 2007 to January 2009. The mean age was 46 years (range = 19-83). The body mass index ranged from 20 to 41 and ASA was I-II. Transgastric (TG) cholecystectomy was performed in 27 patients and 12 patients had a transvaginal (TV) cholecystectomy.
RESULTS: The mean operative time was 140 min. Although operative times were slightly shorter in the TG group 005B137 +/- 34.6 min (range = 75-195)] compared to the TV route [147 +/- 31.5 min (range = 95-220)], there were no significant differences between the two groups (p = 0.5, Mann-Whitney U test). Patients were started on liquids within 1 h and discharged 2 h later, except the last 11 TG patients, who went home 24 h later because of enrollment in a separate protocol. An overall 20% morbidity rate and no mortality were found. The complication rates for the TG and TV groups were 18% (5/27) and 25% (3/12), respectively, which was not statistically significant (p = 0.6, chi(2) test). Seventy-five percent of complications (6/8) occurred the first year and 25% (2/8) during the second year of our experience.
CONCLUSION: Transgastric and transvaginal cholecystectomies are feasible. Although these NOTES procedures were laparoscopically assisted and current flexible endoscopes were used, it seems possible that major intra-abdominal surgeries may one day be performed without skin incisions. However, a learning curve is mandatory and, although there were no major bile duct injuries, there were NOTES-related complications. These trends toward incisionless surgery demand coordinated research in an interdisciplinary setting involving both surgeons and device manufacturers to further define appropriate indications, contraindications, and applications for natural-orifice surgery.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19997754     DOI: 10.1007/s00464-009-0733-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Surg Endosc        ISSN: 0930-2794            Impact factor:   4.584


  14 in total

1.  Flexible transgastric peritoneoscopy: a novel approach to diagnostic and therapeutic interventions in the peritoneal cavity.

Authors:  Anthony N Kalloo; Vikesh K Singh; Sanjay B Jagannath; Hideaki Niiyama; Susan L Hill; Cheryl A Vaughn; Carolyn A Magee; Sergey V Kantsevoy
Journal:  Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  2004-07       Impact factor: 9.427

2.  Gastroenterologists as surgeons: what they need to know.

Authors:  Jeffrey L Ponsky
Journal:  Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  2005-03       Impact factor: 9.427

3.  Transgastric surgery in the abdomen: the dawn of a new era?

Authors:  Juergen Hochberger; Wolfram Lamadé
Journal:  Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  2005-08       Impact factor: 9.427

4.  ASGE/SAGES Working Group on Natural Orifice Translumenal Endoscopic Surgery. October 2005.

Authors:  D Rattner; A Kalloo
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2006-02       Impact factor: 4.584

Review 5.  A primer on natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery: building a new paradigm.

Authors:  Michael F McGee; Michael J Rosen; Jeffrey Marks; Raymond P Onders; Amitabh Chak; Ashley Faulx; Victor K Chen; Jeffrey Ponsky
Journal:  Surg Innov       Date:  2006-06       Impact factor: 2.058

6.  Experimental studies of transgastric gallbladder surgery: cholecystectomy and cholecystogastric anastomosis (videos).

Authors:  Per-Ola Park; Maria Bergström; Keiichi Ikeda; Annette Fritscher-Ravens; Paul Swain
Journal:  Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  2005-04       Impact factor: 9.427

7.  Development of a new access device for transgastric surgery.

Authors:  Lee L Swanstrom; Richard Kozarek; Pankaj J Pasricha; Steven Gross; Desmond Birkett; Per-Ola Park; Vahid Saadat; Richard Ewers; Paul Swain
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2005-11       Impact factor: 3.452

8.  Surgery without scars: report of transluminal cholecystectomy in a human being.

Authors:  Jacques Marescaux; Bernard Dallemagne; Silvana Perretta; Arnaud Wattiez; Didier Mutter; Dimitri Coumaros
Journal:  Arch Surg       Date:  2007-09

9.  NOTES transvaginal cholecystectomy: preliminary clinical application.

Authors:  R Zorron; L C Maggioni; L Pombo; A L Oliveira; G L Carvalho; M Filgueiras
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2007-11-20       Impact factor: 4.584

10.  Natural-orifice transgastric endoscopic peritoneoscopy in humans: Initial clinical trial.

Authors:  Jeffrey W Hazey; Vimal K Narula; David B Renton; Kevin M Reavis; Christopher M Paul; Kristen E Hinshaw; Peter Muscarella; E Christopher Ellison; W Scott Melvin
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2007-08-14       Impact factor: 4.584

View more
  33 in total

1.  Pure natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery (NOTES) with ultrasonography-guided transgastric access and over-the-scope-clip closure: a porcine feasibility and survival study.

Authors:  Anders Meller Donatsky; Luise Andersen; Ole Lerberg Nielsen; Barbara Juliane Holzknecht; Peter Vilmann; Søren Meisner; Lars Nannestad Jørgensen; Jacob Rosenberg
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2012-01-12       Impact factor: 4.584

2.  Transvaginal cholecystectomy without laparoscopic support using prototype flexible endoscopic instruments in a porcine model.

Authors:  Shean Satgunam; Brent Miedema; Susan Whang; Klaus Thaler
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2012-02-24       Impact factor: 4.584

3.  Evaluation of the clinical and inflammatory responses in exclusively NOTES transvaginal cholecystectomy versus laparoscopic routes: an experimental study in swine.

Authors:  Josiel P Vieira; Marcelo M Linhares; Elesiário M Caetano; Rita M A Moura; Vitor Asseituno; Rogério Fuzyi; Manoel J B Girão; José M Ruano; Alberto Goldenberg; Gaspar de Jesus L Filho; Délcio Matos
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2012-06-23       Impact factor: 4.584

Review 4.  [Transesophageal/transgastric access for NOTES].

Authors:  A Fritscher-Ravens
Journal:  Chirurg       Date:  2010-05       Impact factor: 0.955

5.  Natural orifice translumenal surgery: Flexible platform review.

Authors:  Sohail N Shaikh; Christopher C Thompson
Journal:  World J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2010-06-27

Review 6.  New minimally invasive approaches for cholecystectomy: Review of literature.

Authors:  Martin Gaillard; Hadrien Tranchart; Panagiotis Lainas; Ibrahim Dagher
Journal:  World J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2015-10-27

Review 7.  Shifting Paradigms in Minimally Invasive Surgery: Applications of Transanal Natural Orifice Transluminal Endoscopic Surgery in Colorectal Surgery.

Authors:  Grace Clara Lee; Patricia Sylla
Journal:  Clin Colon Rectal Surg       Date:  2015-09

Review 8.  Prophylactic surgery prior to extended-duration space flight: is the benefit worth the risk?

Authors:  Chad G Ball; Andrew W Kirkpatrick; David R Williams; Jeffrey A Jones; J D Polk; James M Vanderploeg; Mark A Talamini; Mark R Campbell; Timothy J Broderick
Journal:  Can J Surg       Date:  2012-04       Impact factor: 2.089

Review 9.  Natural orifice translumenal endoscopic surgery (NOTES(®)): a technical review.

Authors:  Edward D Auyang; Byron F Santos; Daniel H Enter; Eric S Hungness; Nathaniel J Soper
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2011-05-07       Impact factor: 4.584

10.  Is laparoscopic cholecystectomy more challenging in male patients?

Authors:  Peter Ambe; Babak Janghorban Esfahani; Ibrahim Tasci; Hildegard Christ; Lothar Köhler
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2011-02-07       Impact factor: 4.584

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.