Literature DB >> 19995233

Cellular radiosensitivity: how much better do we understand it?

Penny Jeggo1, Martin F Lavin.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Ionising radiation exposure gives rise to a variety of lesions in DNA that result in genetic instability and potentially tumourigenesis or cell death. Radiation extends its effects on DNA by direct interaction or by radiolysis of H(2)O that generates free radicals or aqueous electrons capable of interacting with and causing indirect damage to DNA. While the various lesions arising in DNA after radiation exposure can contribute to the mutagenising effects of this agent, the potentially most damaging lesion is the DNA double strand break (DSB) that contributes to genome instability and/or cell death. Thus in many cases failure to recognise and/or repair this lesion determines the radiosensitivity status of the cell. DNA repair mechanisms including homologous recombination (HR) and non-homologous end-joining (NHEJ) have evolved to protect cells against DNA DSB. Mutations in proteins that constitute these repair pathways are characterised by radiosensitivity and genome instability. Defects in a number of these proteins also give rise to genetic disorders that feature not only genetic instability but also immunodeficiency, cancer predisposition, neurodegeneration and other pathologies.
CONCLUSIONS: In the past 50 years our understanding of the cellular response to radiation damage has advanced enormously with insight being gained from a wide range of approaches extending from more basic early studies to the sophisticated approaches used today. In this review we discuss our current understanding of the impact of radiation on the cell and the organism gained from the array of past and present studies and attempt to provide an explanation for what it is that determines the response to radiation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19995233     DOI: 10.3109/09553000903261263

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Radiat Biol        ISSN: 0955-3002            Impact factor:   2.694


  64 in total

Review 1.  MicroRNAs: new players in the DNA damage response.

Authors:  Hailiang Hu; Richard A Gatti
Journal:  J Mol Cell Biol       Date:  2010-12-23       Impact factor: 6.216

Review 2.  Cell therapy of burns.

Authors:  T Leclerc; C Thepenier; P Jault; E Bey; J Peltzer; M Trouillas; P Duhamel; L Bargues; M Prat; M Bonderriter; J-J Lataillade
Journal:  Cell Prolif       Date:  2011-04       Impact factor: 6.831

3.  The mTOR inhibitor rapamycin suppresses DNA double-strand break repair.

Authors:  Honghong Chen; Zhefu Ma; Robert P Vanderwaal; Zhihui Feng; Ignacio Gonzalez-Suarez; Shenming Wang; Jiuqin Zhang; Joseph L Roti Roti; Susana Gonzalo; Junran Zhang
Journal:  Radiat Res       Date:  2010-10-26       Impact factor: 2.841

4.  Complex cisplatin-double strand break (DSB) lesions directly impair cellular non-homologous end-joining (NHEJ) independent of downstream damage response (DDR) pathways.

Authors:  Catherine R Sears; John J Turchi
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2012-05-23       Impact factor: 5.157

5.  Low ATM protein expression and depletion of p53 correlates with olaparib sensitivity in gastric cancer cell lines.

Authors:  Eiji Kubota; Christopher T Williamson; Ruiqiong Ye; Anifat Elegbede; Lars Peterson; Susan P Lees-Miller; D Gwyn Bebb
Journal:  Cell Cycle       Date:  2014-05-19       Impact factor: 4.534

6.  The impact of ionizing radiation on placental trophoblasts.

Authors:  D J Kanter; M B O'Brien; X-H Shi; T Chu; T Mishima; S Beriwal; M W Epperly; P Wipf; J S Greenberger; Y Sadovsky
Journal:  Placenta       Date:  2014-01-02       Impact factor: 3.481

7.  BRCA1 recruitment to damaged DNA sites is dependent on CDK9.

Authors:  Thales C Nepomuceno; Vanessa C Fernandes; Thiago T Gomes; Renato S Carvalho; Guilherme Suarez-Kurtz; Alvaro N Monteiro; Marcelo A Carvalho
Journal:  Cell Cycle       Date:  2017-02-22       Impact factor: 4.534

8.  Chromatin modifiers and remodellers in DNA repair and signalling.

Authors:  Penny A Jeggo; Jessica A Downs; Susan M Gasser
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2017-10-05       Impact factor: 6.237

Review 9.  Non-homologous end joining: emerging themes and unanswered questions.

Authors:  Sarvan Kumar Radhakrishnan; Nicholas Jette; Susan P Lees-Miller
Journal:  DNA Repair (Amst)       Date:  2014-02-26

10.  Requirement of ATM-dependent pathway for the repair of a subset of DNA double strand breaks created by restriction endonucleases.

Authors:  Keiji Suzuki; Maiko Takahashi; Yasuyoshi Oka; Motohiro Yamauchi; Masatoshi Suzuki; Shunichi Yamashita
Journal:  Genome Integr       Date:  2010-05-26
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.