Literature DB >> 1996948

Comparison of the effects of scopolamine administered before and after acquisition in a test of visual recognition memory in monkeys.

T G Aigner1, D L Walker, M Mishkin.   

Abstract

The effect of scopolamine on visual recognition memory in rhesus monkeys was assessed with a delayed nonmatching-to-sample task employing trial-unique stimuli. During the acquisition phase, 40 sample stimuli were presented sequentially. During the test phase, these same stimuli were presented in the reverse order, each paired with a novel stimulus. The animal was rewarded for choosing the novel stimulus in each pair. Two versions of this design were used. In Task 1, scopolamine (10.0 or 17.8 micrograms/kg) was administered 20 min prior to acquisition, which was followed immediately by the test phase. In Task 2, the drug was administered immediately after acquisition, which was followed 20 min later by the test phase. Performance was impaired in a dose-related manner in Task 1, but not at all in Task 2, indicating that the effects of scopolamine on performance cannot be attributed to an impairment either in the retrieval of stored information or in the attentive or perceptual discriminative processes needed for such retrieval, or, by implication, for storage. In addition, the forgetting curves for scopolamine in Task 1 were parallel to those of the control sessions; i.e., the curves did not diverge with increasing delay intervals, indicating that scopolamine did not increase the rate of forgetting. Taken together, the results suggest that scopolamine interferes selectively with the initial storage of the information to be remembered.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1991        PMID: 1996948     DOI: 10.1016/0163-1047(91)80127-z

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Behav Neural Biol        ISSN: 0163-1047


  33 in total

1.  Simulations of the role of the muscarinic-activated calcium-sensitive nonspecific cation current INCM in entorhinal neuronal activity during delayed matching tasks.

Authors:  Erik Fransen; Angel A Alonso; Michael E Hasselmo
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2002-02-01       Impact factor: 6.167

2.  Effects of cholinergic deafferentation of the rhinal cortex on visual recognition memory in monkeys.

Authors:  Janita Turchi; Richard C Saunders; Mortimer Mishkin
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2005-01-31       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 3.  Neuromodulation by glutamate and acetylcholine can change circuit dynamics by regulating the relative influence of afferent input and excitatory feedback.

Authors:  Lisa M Giocomo; Michael E Hasselmo
Journal:  Mol Neurobiol       Date:  2007-07-20       Impact factor: 5.590

4.  Double dissociation of pharmacologically induced deficits in visual recognition and visual discrimination learning.

Authors:  Janita Turchi; Deanne Buffalari; Mortimer Mishkin
Journal:  Learn Mem       Date:  2008-08-06       Impact factor: 2.460

5.  Memory modulation with peripherally acting cholinergic drugs.

Authors:  D K Rush; K Streit
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  1992       Impact factor: 4.530

6.  Effects of muscarinic blockade in perirhinal cortex during visual recognition.

Authors:  Y Tang; M Mishkin; T G Aigner
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1997-11-11       Impact factor: 11.205

7.  Amygdalar lesions block discriminative avoidance learning and cingulothalamic training-induced neuronal plasticity in rabbits.

Authors:  A Poremba; M Gabriel
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  1997-07-01       Impact factor: 6.167

Review 8.  Mechanisms underlying working memory for novel information.

Authors:  Michael E Hasselmo; Chantal E Stern
Journal:  Trends Cogn Sci       Date:  2006-10-02       Impact factor: 20.229

9.  Scopolamine impairs auditory delayed matching-to-sample performance in monkeys.

Authors:  Bethany Plakke; Chi-Wing Ng; Amy Poremba
Journal:  Neurosci Lett       Date:  2008-04-10       Impact factor: 3.046

10.  A selective allosteric potentiator of the M1 muscarinic acetylcholine receptor increases activity of medial prefrontal cortical neurons and restores impairments in reversal learning.

Authors:  Jana K Shirey; Ashley E Brady; Paulianda J Jones; Albert A Davis; Thomas M Bridges; J Phillip Kennedy; Satyawan B Jadhav; Usha N Menon; Zixiu Xiang; Mona L Watson; Edward P Christian; James J Doherty; Michael C Quirk; Dean H Snyder; James J Lah; Allan I Levey; Michelle M Nicolle; Craig W Lindsley; P Jeffrey Conn
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2009-11-11       Impact factor: 6.167

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.