Literature DB >> 19968413

Disgust and the moralization of purity.

E J Horberg1, Christopher Oveis, Dacher Keltner, Adam B Cohen.   

Abstract

Guided by appraisal-based models of the influence of emotion upon judgment, we propose that disgust moralizes--that is, amplifies the moral significance of--protecting the purity of the body and soul. Three studies documented that state and trait disgust, but not other negative emotions, moralize the purity moral domain but not the moral domains of justice or harm/care. In Study 1, integral feelings of disgust, but not integral anger, predicted stronger moral condemnation of behaviors violating purity. In Study 2, experimentally induced disgust, compared with induced sadness, increased condemnation of behaviors violating purity and increased approval of behaviors upholding purity. In Study 3, trait disgust, but not trait anger or trait fear, predicted stronger condemnation of purity violations and greater approval of behaviors upholding purity. We found that, confirming the domain specificity of the disgust-purity association, disgust was unrelated to moral judgments about justice (Studies 1 and 2) or harm/care (Study 3). Finally, across studies, individuals of lower socioeconomic status (SES) were more likely than individuals of higher SES to moralize purity but not justice or harm/care.

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19968413     DOI: 10.1037/a0017423

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Pers Soc Psychol        ISSN: 0022-3514


  32 in total

1.  Ethical Discourse about the Modification of Food for Therapeutic Purposes: How Patients with Gastrointestinal Diseases View the Good, the Bad, and the Healthy.

Authors:  Krista L Harrison; Gail Geller; Patricia Marshall; Jon Tilburt; Marybeth Mercer; Margaret A Brinich; Janelle Highland; Ruth M Farrell; Richard R Sharp
Journal:  AJOB Prim Res       Date:  2012-06-19

Review 2.  Implications of the behavioural immune system for social behaviour and human health in the modern world.

Authors:  Mark Schaller; Damian R Murray; Adrian Bangerter
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2015-05-26       Impact factor: 6.237

Review 3.  Grounding evaluative concepts.

Authors:  Joerg Fingerhut; Jesse J Prinz
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2018-08-05       Impact factor: 6.237

4.  Moral foundations vignettes: a standardized stimulus database of scenarios based on moral foundations theory.

Authors:  Scott Clifford; Vijeth Iyengar; Roberto Cabeza; Walter Sinnott-Armstrong
Journal:  Behav Res Methods       Date:  2015-12

5.  Eager feelings and vigilant reasons: Regulatory focus differences in judging moral wrongs.

Authors:  James F M Cornwell; E Tory Higgins
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Gen       Date:  2016-01-04

Review 6.  The Psychology of Morality: A Review and Analysis of Empirical Studies Published From 1940 Through 2017.

Authors:  Naomi Ellemers; Jojanneke van der Toorn; Yavor Paunov; Thed van Leeuwen
Journal:  Pers Soc Psychol Rev       Date:  2019-01-18

7.  Binding moral values gain importance in the presence of close others.

Authors:  Daniel A Yudkin; Ana P Gantman; Wilhelm Hofmann; Jordi Quoidbach
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2021-05-11       Impact factor: 14.919

8.  The roles of dehumanization and moral outrage in retributive justice.

Authors:  Brock Bastian; Thomas F Denson; Nick Haslam
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-04-23       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Understanding libertarian morality: the psychological dispositions of self-identified libertarians.

Authors:  Ravi Iyer; Spassena Koleva; Jesse Graham; Peter Ditto; Jonathan Haidt
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-08-21       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Temporal dynamics of disgust and morality: an event-related potential study.

Authors:  Qun Yang; Li Yan; Junlong Luo; An Li; Ye Zhang; Xuehong Tian; Dexuan Zhang
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-05-28       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.