Literature DB >> 19966067

Transient genotype-by-environment interactions following environmental shock provide a source of expression variation for essential genes.

Kevin H Eng1, Daniel J Kvitek, Sündüz Keles, Audrey P Gasch.   

Abstract

Understanding complex genotype-by-environment interactions (GEIs) is crucial for understanding phenotypic variation. An important factor often overlooked in GEI studies is time. We measured the contribution of GEIs to expression variation in four nonlaboratory Saccharomyces cerevisiae strains responding dynamically to a 25 degrees -37 degrees heat shock. GEI was a major force explaining expression variation, affecting 55% of the genes analyzed. Importantly, almost half of these expression patterns showed GEI influence only during the transition between environments, but not in acclimated cells. This class reveals a genotype-by-environment-by-time interaction that affected expression of a large fraction of yeast genes. Strikingly, although transcripts subject to persistent GEI effects were enriched for nonessential genes with upstream TATA elements, those displaying transient GEIs were enriched for essential genes regardless of TATA regulation. Genes subject to persistent GEI influences showed relaxed constraint on acclimated gene expression compared to the average yeast gene, whereas genes restricted to transient GEIs did not. We propose that transient GEI during the transition between environments provides a previously unappreciated source of expression variation, particularly for essential genes.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19966067      PMCID: PMC2828734          DOI: 10.1534/genetics.109.107268

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Genetics        ISSN: 0016-6731            Impact factor:   4.562


  29 in total

1.  Control of stochasticity in eukaryotic gene expression.

Authors:  Jonathan M Raser; Erin K O'Shea
Journal:  Science       Date:  2004-05-27       Impact factor: 47.728

Review 2.  Schizophrenia: genes and environment.

Authors:  M Tsuang
Journal:  Biol Psychiatry       Date:  2000-02-01       Impact factor: 13.382

3.  Genomic expression programs in the response of yeast cells to environmental changes.

Authors:  A P Gasch; P T Spellman; C M Kao; O Carmel-Harel; M B Eisen; G Storz; D Botstein; P O Brown
Journal:  Mol Biol Cell       Date:  2000-12       Impact factor: 4.138

4.  Functional characterization of the S. cerevisiae genome by gene deletion and parallel analysis.

Authors:  E A Winzeler; D D Shoemaker; A Astromoff; H Liang; K Anderson; B Andre; R Bangham; R Benito; J D Boeke; H Bussey; A M Chu; C Connelly; K Davis; F Dietrich; S W Dow; M El Bakkoury; F Foury; S H Friend; E Gentalen; G Giaever; J H Hegemann; T Jones; M Laub; H Liao; N Liebundguth; D J Lockhart; A Lucau-Danila; M Lussier; N M'Rabet; P Menard; M Mittmann; C Pai; C Rebischung; J L Revuelta; L Riles; C J Roberts; P Ross-MacDonald; B Scherens; M Snyder; S Sookhai-Mahadeo; R K Storms; S Véronneau; M Voet; G Volckaert; T R Ward; R Wysocki; G S Yen; K Yu; K Zimmermann; P Philippsen; M Johnston; R W Davis
Journal:  Science       Date:  1999-08-06       Impact factor: 47.728

5.  Identification and distinct regulation of yeast TATA box-containing genes.

Authors:  Andrew D Basehoar; Sara J Zanton; B Franklin Pugh
Journal:  Cell       Date:  2004-03-05       Impact factor: 41.582

6.  Adaptive prediction of environmental changes by microorganisms.

Authors:  Amir Mitchell; Gal H Romano; Bella Groisman; Avihu Yona; Erez Dekel; Martin Kupiec; Orna Dahan; Yitzhak Pilpel
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2009-06-17       Impact factor: 49.962

7.  Population genetic variation in gene expression is associated with phenotypic variation in Saccharomyces cerevisiae.

Authors:  Justin C Fay; Heather L McCullough; Paul D Sniegowski; Michael B Eisen
Journal:  Genome Biol       Date:  2004-03-24       Impact factor: 13.583

8.  Yeast genomic expression studies using DNA microarrays.

Authors:  Audrey P Gasch
Journal:  Methods Enzymol       Date:  2002       Impact factor: 1.600

Review 9.  Uncovering cryptic genetic variation.

Authors:  Greg Gibson; Ian Dworkin
Journal:  Nat Rev Genet       Date:  2004-09       Impact factor: 53.242

10.  Whole-genome microarrays of fission yeast: characteristics, accuracy, reproducibility, and processing of array data.

Authors:  Rachel Lyne; Gavin Burns; Juan Mata; Chris J Penkett; Gabriella Rustici; Dongrong Chen; Cordelia Langford; David Vetrie; Jürg Bähler
Journal:  BMC Genomics       Date:  2003-07-10       Impact factor: 3.969

View more
  14 in total

1.  Evolution of gene expression and expression plasticity in long-term experimental populations of Drosophila melanogaster maintained under constant and variable ethanol stress.

Authors:  Lev Y Yampolsky; Galina V Glazko; James D Fry
Journal:  Mol Ecol       Date:  2012-07-09       Impact factor: 6.185

2.  Early transcriptional response pathways in Daphnia magna are coordinated in networks of crustacean-specific genes.

Authors:  Luisa Orsini; James B Brown; Omid Shams Solari; Dong Li; Shan He; Ram Podicheti; Marcus H Stoiber; Katina I Spanier; Donald Gilbert; Mieke Jansen; Douglas B Rusch; Michael E Pfrender; John K Colbourne; Mikko J Frilander; Jouni Kvist; Ellen Decaestecker; Karel A C De Schamphelaere; Luc De Meester
Journal:  Mol Ecol       Date:  2017-08-19       Impact factor: 6.185

3.  Systematic identification of cis-regulatory variants that cause gene expression differences in a yeast cross.

Authors:  Kaushik Renganaath; Rocky Cheung; Laura Day; Sriram Kosuri; Leonid Kruglyak; Frank W Albert
Journal:  Elife       Date:  2020-11-12       Impact factor: 8.140

4.  Genetic architecture of ethanol-responsive transcriptome variation in Saccharomyces cerevisiae strains.

Authors:  Jeffrey A Lewis; Aimee T Broman; Jessica Will; Audrey P Gasch
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2014-06-26       Impact factor: 4.562

5.  Accurate and Sensitive Quantitation of the Dynamic Heat Shock Proteome Using Tandem Mass Tags.

Authors:  Aaron J Storey; Rebecca E Hardman; Stephanie D Byrum; Samuel G Mackintosh; Rick D Edmondson; Wayne P Wahls; Alan J Tackett; Jeffrey A Lewis
Journal:  J Proteome Res       Date:  2020-02-19       Impact factor: 4.466

Review 6.  Impulse control: temporal dynamics in gene transcription.

Authors:  Nir Yosef; Aviv Regev
Journal:  Cell       Date:  2011-03-18       Impact factor: 41.582

7.  Defining flexible vs. inherent promoter architectures: the importance of dynamics and environmental considerations.

Authors:  Dana J Huebert; Audrey P Gasch
Journal:  Nucleus       Date:  2012-07-03       Impact factor: 4.197

Review 8.  Fungal regulatory evolution: cis and trans in the balance.

Authors:  Dawn Anne Thompson; Aviv Regev
Journal:  FEBS Lett       Date:  2009-12-17       Impact factor: 4.124

9.  Nonlinear fitness consequences of variation in expression level of a eukaryotic gene.

Authors:  Joshua S Rest; Christopher M Morales; John B Waldron; Dana A Opulente; Julius Fisher; Seungjae Moon; Kevin Bullaughey; Lucas B Carey; Demitri Dedousis
Journal:  Mol Biol Evol       Date:  2012-10-27       Impact factor: 16.240

10.  Genetical Genomics Reveals Large Scale Genotype-By-Environment Interactions in Arabidopsis thaliana.

Authors:  L Basten Snoek; Inez R Terpstra; René Dekter; Guido Van den Ackerveken; Anton J M Peeters
Journal:  Front Genet       Date:  2013-01-10       Impact factor: 4.599

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.