Literature DB >> 19965900

Making scents: dynamic olfactometry for threshold measurement.

Roland Schmidt1, William S Cain.   

Abstract

Data on human odor thresholds show disparities huge enough to marginalize olfactory psychophysics and delegitimize importation of its data into other areas. Variation of orders of magnitude from study to study, much of it systematic, threatens meaningful comparisons with animal species, comparison between in vivo with in vitro studies, the search for molecular determinants of potency, and use of olfactory information for environmental or public health policy. On the premise that good experimental results will flow from use of good tools, this report describes a vapor delivery system and its peripherals that instantiate good tools. The vapor delivery device 8 (VDD8) provides flexibility in range of delivered concentrations, offers definable stability of delivery, accommodates solvent-free delivery below a part per trillion, gives a realistic interface with subjects, has accessible and replaceable components, and adapts to a variety of psychophysical methodologies. The device serves most often for measurement of absolute sensitivity, where its design encourages collection of thousands of judgments per day from subjects tested simultaneously. The results have shown humans to be more sensitive and less variable than has previous testing. The VDD8 can also serve for measurement of differential sensitivity, discrimination of quality, and perception of mixtures and masking. The exposition seeks to transmit general lessons while it proffers some specifics of design to reproduce features of the device in a new or existing system. The principles can apply to devices for animal testing.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19965900      PMCID: PMC2805809          DOI: 10.1093/chemse/bjp088

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Chem Senses        ISSN: 0379-864X            Impact factor:   3.160


  15 in total

1.  Source emission odor measurement by a dynamic forced-choice triangle olfactometer.

Authors:  A Dravnieks; W H Prokop
Journal:  J Air Pollut Control Assoc       Date:  1975-01

2.  Methods for building an olfactometer with known concentration outcomes.

Authors:  Bradley N Johnson; Noam Sobel
Journal:  J Neurosci Methods       Date:  2006-11-01       Impact factor: 2.390

3.  A building-block model for the characterization of odorant molecules and their odors.

Authors:  A Dravnieks
Journal:  Ann N Y Acad Sci       Date:  1974-09-27       Impact factor: 5.691

4.  The effect of expectation on judgments of odor.

Authors:  T Engen
Journal:  Acta Psychol (Amst)       Date:  1972-12

Review 5.  Toxicological, medical and industrial hygiene aspects of glutaraldehyde with particular reference to its biocidal use in cold sterilization procedures.

Authors:  B Ballantyne; S L Jordan
Journal:  J Appl Toxicol       Date:  2001 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 3.446

6.  Nasal pungency, odor, and eye irritation thresholds for homologous acetates.

Authors:  J E Cometto-Muñiz; W S Cain
Journal:  Pharmacol Biochem Behav       Date:  1991-08       Impact factor: 3.533

7.  Characterisation of human behaviour during odour perception.

Authors:  D G Laing
Journal:  Perception       Date:  1982       Impact factor: 1.490

8.  Natural sniffing gives optimum odour perception for humans.

Authors:  D G Laing
Journal:  Perception       Date:  1983       Impact factor: 1.490

9.  Olfactory detectability of homologous n-alkylbenzenes as reflected by concentration-detection functions in humans.

Authors:  J E Cometto-Muñiz; M H Abraham
Journal:  Neuroscience       Date:  2009-03-20       Impact factor: 3.590

10.  Odor and chemesthesis from exposures to glutaraldehyde vapor.

Authors:  William S Cain; Roland Schmidt; Alfredo A Jalowayski
Journal:  Int Arch Occup Environ Health       Date:  2007-04-12       Impact factor: 2.851

View more
  4 in total

1.  Structure-activity relationships on the odor detectability of homologous carboxylic acids by humans.

Authors:  J Enrique Cometto-Muñiz; Michael H Abraham
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2010-10-08       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  Canine Olfactory Thresholds to Amyl Acetate in a Biomedical Detection Scenario.

Authors:  Astrid R Concha; Claire M Guest; Rob Harris; Thomas W Pike; Alexandre Feugier; Helen Zulch; Daniel S Mills
Journal:  Front Vet Sci       Date:  2019-01-22

3.  VOCs and Odor Episodes near the German-Czech Border: Social Participation, Chemical Analyses and Health Risk Assessment.

Authors:  Jan Leníček; Ivan Beneš; Eva Rychlíková; David Šubrt; Ondřej Řezníček; Tomáš Roubal; Joseph P Pinto
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2022-01-24       Impact factor: 3.390

4.  Odor thresholds and breathing changes of human volunteers as consequences of sulphur dioxide exposure considering individual factors.

Authors:  Stefan Kleinbeck; Michael Schäper; Stephanie A Juran; Ernst Kiesswetter; Meinolf Blaszkewicz; Klaus Golka; Anna Zimmermann; Thomas Brüning; Christoph Van Thriel
Journal:  Saf Health Work       Date:  2011-12-05
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.