Literature DB >> 19965810

Physiological and computed tomographic predictors of outcome from lung volume reduction surgery.

George R Washko1, Fernando J Martinez, Eric A Hoffman, Stephen H Loring, Raúl San José Estépar, Alejandro A Diaz, Frank C Sciurba, Edwin K Silverman, MeiLan K Han, Malcolm Decamp, John J Reilly.   

Abstract

RATIONALE: Previous investigations have identified several potential predictors of outcomes from lung volume reduction surgery (LVRS). A concern regarding these studies has been their small sample size, which may limit generalizability. We therefore sought to examine radiographic and physiologic predictors of surgical outcomes in a large, multicenter clinical investigation, the National Emphysema Treatment Trial.
OBJECTIVES: To identify objective radiographic and physiological indices of lung disease that have prognostic value in subjects with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease being evaluated for LVRS.
METHODS: A subset of the subjects undergoing LVRS in the National Emphysema Treatment Trial underwent preoperative high-resolution computed tomographic (CT) scanning of the chest and measures of static lung recoil at total lung capacity (SRtlc) and inspiratory resistance (Ri). The relationship between CT measures of emphysema, the ratio of upper to lower zone emphysema, CT measures of airway disease, SRtlc, Ri, the ratio of residual volume to total lung capacity (RV/TLC), and both 6-month postoperative changes in FEV(1) and maximal exercise capacity were assessed.
MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Physiological measures of lung elastic recoil and inspiratory resistance were not correlated with improvement in either the FEV(1) (R = -0.03, P = 0.78 and R = -0.17, P = 0.16, respectively) or maximal exercise capacity (R = -0.02, P = 0.83 and R = 0.08, P = 0.53, respectively). The RV/TLC ratio and CT measures of emphysema and its upper to lower zone ratio were only weakly predictive of postoperative changes in both the FEV(1) (R = 0.11, P = 0.01; R = 0.2, P < 0.0001; and R = 0.23, P < 0.0001, respectively) and maximal exercise capacity (R = 0.17, P = 0.0001; R = 0.15, P = 0.002; and R = 0.15, P = 0.002, respectively). CT assessments of airway disease were not predictive of change in FEV(1) or exercise capacity in this cohort.
CONCLUSIONS: The RV/TLC ratio and CT measures of emphysema and its distribution are weak but statistically significant predictors of outcome after LVRS.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19965810      PMCID: PMC2830400          DOI: 10.1164/rccm.200906-0911OC

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Respir Crit Care Med        ISSN: 1073-449X            Impact factor:   21.405


  21 in total

1.  Improvement in spirometry following lung volume reduction surgery: application of a physiologic model.

Authors:  Henry E Fessler; Steven M Scharf; Solbert Permutt
Journal:  Am J Respir Crit Care Med       Date:  2002-01-01       Impact factor: 21.405

2.  The measurement of intraesophageal pressure and its relationship to intrathoracic pressure.

Authors:  D L FRY; W W STEAD; R V EBERT; R I LUBIN; H S WELLS
Journal:  J Lab Clin Med       Date:  1952-11

3.  Preoperative screening for lung volume reduction surgery: usefulness of combining thin-section CT with physiologic assessment.

Authors:  A Hunsaker; E Ingenito; U Topal; R Pugatch; J Reilly
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  1998-02       Impact factor: 3.959

4.  Relation between preoperative inspiratory lung resistance and the outcome of lung-volume-reduction surgery for emphysema.

Authors:  E P Ingenito; R B Evans; S H Loring; D W Kaczka; J D Rodenhouse; S C Body; D J Sugarbaker; S J Mentzer; M M DeCamp; J J Reilly
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1998-04-23       Impact factor: 91.245

5.  Long-term follow-up of patients receiving lung-volume-reduction surgery versus medical therapy for severe emphysema by the National Emphysema Treatment Trial Research Group.

Authors:  Keith S Naunheim; Douglas E Wood; Zab Mohsenifar; Alice L Sternberg; Gerard J Criner; Malcolm M DeCamp; Claude C Deschamps; Fernando J Martinez; Frank C Sciurba; James Tonascia; Alfred P Fishman
Journal:  Ann Thorac Surg       Date:  2006-08       Impact factor: 4.330

6.  Improvement in pulmonary function and elastic recoil after lung-reduction surgery for diffuse emphysema.

Authors:  F C Sciurba; R M Rogers; R J Keenan; W A Slivka; J Gorcsan; P F Ferson; J M Holbert; M L Brown; R J Landreneau
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1996-04-25       Impact factor: 91.245

7.  A four-year follow-up study of lung mechanics in smokers.

Authors:  R P Corbin; M Loveland; R R Martin; P T Macklem
Journal:  Am Rev Respir Dis       Date:  1979-08

8.  The prediction of small airway dimensions using computed tomography.

Authors:  Yasutaka Nakano; Jonathan C Wong; Pim A de Jong; Lilliana Buzatu; Taishi Nagao; Harvey O Coxson; W Mark Elliott; James C Hogg; Peter D Paré
Journal:  Am J Respir Crit Care Med       Date:  2004-10-29       Impact factor: 21.405

9.  Bronchoscopic lung volume reduction for end-stage emphysema: report on the first 98 patients.

Authors:  Innes Y P Wan; Tudor P Toma; Duncan M Geddes; Greg Snell; Trevor Williams; Federico Venuta; Anthony P C Yim
Journal:  Chest       Date:  2006-03       Impact factor: 9.410

10.  Physiological characterization of variability in response to lung volume reduction surgery.

Authors:  Edward P Ingenito; Stephen H Loring; Marilyn L Moy; Steven J Mentzer; Scott J Swanson; John J Reilly
Journal:  J Appl Physiol (1985)       Date:  2002-09-20
View more
  18 in total

1.  Extrapolation from ten sections can make CT-based quantification of lung aeration more practicable.

Authors:  A W Reske; A P Reske; H A Gast; M Seiwerts; A Beda; U Gottschaldt; C Josten; D Schreiter; N Heller; H Wrigge; M B Amato
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2010-08-06       Impact factor: 17.440

Review 2.  Emphysema and lung volume reduction: the role of radiology.

Authors:  Katharina Martini; Thomas Frauenfelder
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2018-08       Impact factor: 2.895

3.  Accurate measurement of small airways on low-dose thoracic CT scans in smokers.

Authors:  Barbara A Lutey; Susan H Conradi; Jeffrey J Atkinson; Jie Zheng; Kenneth B Schechtman; Robert M Senior; David S Gierada
Journal:  Chest       Date:  2013-05       Impact factor: 9.410

Review 4.  The National Emphysema Treatment Trial (NETT) Part II: Lessons learned about lung volume reduction surgery.

Authors:  Gerard J Criner; Francis Cordova; Alice L Sternberg; Fernando J Martinez
Journal:  Am J Respir Crit Care Med       Date:  2011-10-15       Impact factor: 21.405

Review 5.  Pulmonary CT and MRI phenotypes that help explain chronic pulmonary obstruction disease pathophysiology and outcomes.

Authors:  Eric A Hoffman; David A Lynch; R Graham Barr; Edwin J R van Beek; Grace Parraga
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2015-07-22       Impact factor: 4.813

6.  Clinical and radiographic correlates of hypoxemia and oxygen therapy in the COPDGene study.

Authors:  Deog Kyeom Kim; Francine L Jacobson; George R Washko; Richard Casaburi; Barry J Make; James D Crapo; Edwin K Silverman; Craig P Hersh
Journal:  Respir Med       Date:  2011-03-10       Impact factor: 3.415

Review 7.  Pulmonary function testing in COPD: looking beyond the curtain of FEV1.

Authors:  Sotirios Kakavas; Ourania S Kotsiou; Fotis Perlikos; Maria Mermiri; Georgios Mavrovounis; Konstantinos Gourgoulianis; Ioannis Pantazopoulos
Journal:  NPJ Prim Care Respir Med       Date:  2021-05-07       Impact factor: 2.871

8.  Epidemiology, radiology, and genetics of nicotine dependence in COPD.

Authors:  Deog Kyeom Kim; Craig P Hersh; George R Washko; John E Hokanson; David A Lynch; John D Newell; James R Murphy; James D Crapo; Edwin K Silverman
Journal:  Respir Res       Date:  2011-01-13

9.  In Vivo Computed Tomography as a Research Tool to Investigate Asthma and COPD: Where Do We Stand?

Authors:  Gaël Dournes; Michel Montaudon; Patrick Berger; François Laurent
Journal:  J Allergy (Cairo)       Date:  2012-01-11

10.  Collateral Ventilation Quantification Using Xenon-Enhanced Dynamic Dual-Energy CT: Differences between Canine and Swine Models of Bronchial Occlusion.

Authors:  Eun-Ah Park; Jin Mo Goo; Sang Joon Park; Chang Hyun Lee; Chang Min Park
Journal:  Korean J Radiol       Date:  2015-05-13       Impact factor: 3.500

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.