Literature DB >> 19962970

Effects of spinal cord stimulation with "standard clinical" and higher frequencies on peripheral blood flow in rats.

Jie Gao1, Mingyuan Wu, Linggen Li, Chao Qin, Jay P Farber, Bengt Linderoth, Robert D Foreman.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: It is unclear whether spinal cord stimulation (SCS) at higher frequencies induces further increases in vasodilation and enhances clinical efficacy.
OBJECTIVES: This study investigated effects of SCS at both a normal frequency (as used clinically) and two higher frequencies on peripheral vasodilation.
METHODS: A unipolar ball electrode was placed on the left dorsal column at the lumbar 2-3 spinal cord segments (L2-L3) in sodium pentobarbital anesthetized, paralyzed, and artificially ventilated rats. Cutaneous blood flow recordings from both ipsilateral (left) and contralateral (right) hind foot pads were measured with laser Doppler flow perfusion monitors. SCS at frequencies of 50, 200, or 500 Hz was applied at 30%, 60%, and 90% of motor threshold (MT) using standard square waves. Resiniferatoxin (RTX: an ultrapotent analog of capsaicin) and a calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP) receptor blocker (CGRP(8-37)) was also used to elucidate mechanisms of SCS vasodilation at these higher frequencies.
RESULTS: SCS applied with the three frequencies produced similar MT (n=22). SCS at 500 Hz significantly increased cutaneous blood flow and decreased vascular resistance compared to changes induced by frequencies of 50 and 200 Hz (P<0.05, n=8). RTX (2 microg/kg, i.v.) as well as CGRP(8-37) (2.37 mg/kg, i.v.) significantly reduced SCS-induced vasodilation at 500 Hz (P<0.05, n=6) as compared to responses prior to administrations of these drugs.
CONCLUSION: SCS at 500 Hz significantly increased SCS-induced vasodilation without influencing MT. Furthermore, effects of SCS at 500 Hz are mediated via activation of TRPV1-containing fibers and a release of CGRP. Copyright 2009 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19962970     DOI: 10.1016/j.brainres.2009.11.072

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Brain Res        ISSN: 0006-8993            Impact factor:   3.252


  8 in total

Review 1.  Spinal cord stimulation: neurophysiological and neurochemical mechanisms of action.

Authors:  Yun Guan
Journal:  Curr Pain Headache Rep       Date:  2012-06

2.  Conventional and kilohertz-frequency spinal cord stimulation produces intensity- and frequency-dependent inhibition of mechanical hypersensitivity in a rat model of neuropathic pain.

Authors:  Ronen Shechter; Fei Yang; Qian Xu; Yong-Kwan Cheong; Shao-Qiu He; Andrei Sdrulla; Alene F Carteret; Paul W Wacnik; Xinzhong Dong; Richard A Meyer; Srinivasa N Raja; Yun Guan
Journal:  Anesthesiology       Date:  2013-08       Impact factor: 7.892

Review 3.  Spinal cord stimulation for patients with inoperable chronic critical leg ischemia.

Authors:  Xiao-Pei Chen; Wei-Min Fu; Wei Gu
Journal:  World J Emerg Med       Date:  2011

4.  Femoral vascular conductance and peroneal muscle sympathetic nerve activity responses to acute epidural spinal cord stimulation in humans.

Authors:  Seth W Holwerda; Marshall T Holland; Chandan G Reddy; Gary L Pierce
Journal:  Exp Physiol       Date:  2018-05-05       Impact factor: 2.969

5.  Spinal cord stimulation in experimental chronic painful diabetic polyneuropathy: Delayed effect of High-frequency stimulation.

Authors:  M van Beek; M van Kleef; B Linderoth; S M J van Kuijk; W M Honig; E A Joosten
Journal:  Eur J Pain       Date:  2016-11-28       Impact factor: 3.931

6.  Long-Term Spinal Cord Stimulation Alleviates Mechanical Hypersensitivity and Increases Peripheral Cutaneous Blood Perfusion in Experimental Painful Diabetic Polyneuropathy.

Authors:  Maarten van Beek; Denise Hermes; Wiel M Honig; Bengt Linderoth; Sander M J van Kuijk; Maarten van Kleef; Elbert A Joosten
Journal:  Neuromodulation       Date:  2018-03-09

7.  Improvement of brain perfusion in patients with chronic brain ischemia at epidural spinal cord electrical stimulation.

Authors:  Shu Zhao; Galina Sufianova; Andrey Shapkin; Andrey Mashkin; Svetlana Meshcheryakova; Dayong Han
Journal:  Front Surg       Date:  2022-09-23

8.  High-frequency electrical stimulation can be a complementary therapy to promote nerve regeneration in diabetic rats.

Authors:  Chia-Hong Kao; Jia-Jin J Chen; Yuan-Man Hsu; Da-Tian Bau; Chun-Hsu Yao; Yueh-Sheng Chen
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-11-12       Impact factor: 3.240

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.