Literature DB >> 29603444

Femoral vascular conductance and peroneal muscle sympathetic nerve activity responses to acute epidural spinal cord stimulation in humans.

Seth W Holwerda1,2, Marshall T Holland3, Chandan G Reddy3, Gary L Pierce1,2,4.   

Abstract

NEW
FINDINGS: What is the central question of this research? Does acute spinal cord stimulation increase vascular conductance and decrease muscle sympathetic nerve activity in the lower limbs of humans? What is the main finding and its importance? Acute spinal cord stimulation led to a rapid rise in femoral vascular conductance, and peroneal muscle sympathetic nerve activity demonstrated a delayed reduction that was not associated with the initial increase in femoral vascular conductance. These findings suggest that neural mechanisms in addition to attenuated muscle sympathetic nerve activity might be involved in the initial increase in femoral vascular conductance during acute spinal cord stimulation. ABSTRACT: Clinical cases have indicated an increase in peripheral blood flow after continuous epidural spinal cord stimulation (SCS) and that reduced muscle sympathetic nerve activity (MSNA) might be a potential mechanism. However, no studies in humans have directly examined the effects of acute SCS (<60 min) on vascular conductance and MSNA. In study 1, we tested the hypothesis that acute SCS (<60 min) of the thoracic spine would lead to increased common femoral vascular conductance, but not brachial vascular conductance, in 11 patients who previously underwent surgical SCS implantation for management of neuropathic pain. Throughout 60 min of SCS, common femoral artery conductance was elevated and significantly different from brachial artery conductance [in millilitres per minute: 15 min, change (Δ) 26 ± 37 versus Δ-2 ± 19%; 30 min, Δ28 ± 45 versus Δ0 ± 26%; 45 min, Δ48 ± 43 versus Δ2 ± 21%; 60 min, Δ36 ± 61 versus Δ1 ± 24%; and 15 min post-SCS, Δ51 ± 64 versus Δ6 ± 33%; P = 0.013]. A similar examination in a patient with cervical SCS revealed minimal changes in vascular conductance. In study 2, we examined whether acute SCS reduces peroneal MSNA in a subset of SCS patients (n = 5). The MSNA burst incidence in response to acute SCS gradually declined and was significantly reduced at 45 and 60 min of SCS (in bursts per 100 heart beats: 15 min, Δ-1 ± 12%; 30 min, Δ-14 ± 12%; 45 min, Δ-19 ± 16%; 60 min, Δ-24 ± 18%; and 15 min post-SCS: Δ-11 ± 7%; P = 0.015). These data demonstrate that acute SCS rapidly increases femoral vascular conductance and reduces peroneal MSNA. The gradual reduction in peroneal MSNA observed during acute SCS suggests that neural mechanisms in addition to attenuated MSNA might be involved in the acute increase in femoral vascular conductance.
© 2018 The Authors. Experimental Physiology © 2018 The Physiological Society.

Entities:  

Keywords:  muscle sympathetic nerve activity; peripheral blood flow; spinal cord stimulation

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29603444      PMCID: PMC5984152          DOI: 10.1113/EP086945

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Exp Physiol        ISSN: 0958-0670            Impact factor:   2.969


  41 in total

1.  Spinal cord stimulation in the treatment of peripheral vascular disease: results of a single-center study of 258 patients.

Authors:  Svante Horsch; Stefan Schulte; Stefan Hess
Journal:  Angiology       Date:  2004 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 3.619

2.  Effects of sympathectomy on skin and muscle microcirculation during dorsal column stimulation: animal studies.

Authors:  B Linderoth; L Gunasekera; B A Meyerson
Journal:  Neurosurgery       Date:  1991-12       Impact factor: 4.654

Review 3.  Urinary bladder control by electrical stimulation: review of electrical stimulation techniques in spinal cord injury.

Authors:  N J Rijkhoff; H Wijkstra; P E van Kerrebroeck; F M Debruyne
Journal:  Neurourol Urodyn       Date:  1997       Impact factor: 2.696

4.  Spinal cord stimulation in peripheral arterial disease. A cooperative study.

Authors:  J Broseta; J Barberá; J A de Vera; J L Barcia-Salorio; G Garcia-March; J González-Darder; F Rovaina; V Joanes
Journal:  J Neurosurg       Date:  1986-01       Impact factor: 5.115

5.  High cervical spinal cord stimulation for chronic cluster headache.

Authors:  Tilman Wolter; Andrea Kiemen; Holger Kaube
Journal:  Cephalalgia       Date:  2011-06-23       Impact factor: 6.292

6.  Sympathetic mediation of peripheral vasodilation induced by spinal cord stimulation: animal studies of the role of cholinergic and adrenergic receptor subtypes.

Authors:  B Linderoth; P Herregodts; B A Meyerson
Journal:  Neurosurgery       Date:  1994-10       Impact factor: 4.654

7.  Peripheral hypoxia in restless legs syndrome (Willis-Ekbom disease).

Authors:  Aaro V Salminen; Ville Rimpilä; Olli Polo
Journal:  Neurology       Date:  2014-04-30       Impact factor: 9.910

8.  Epidural spinal cord stimulation for treatment of chronic pain--some predictors of success. A 15-year experience.

Authors:  K Kumar; C Toth; R K Nath; P Laing
Journal:  Surg Neurol       Date:  1998-08

9.  Epidural spinal cord electrical stimulation improves microvascular blood flow in severe limb ischemia.

Authors:  M J Jacobs; P J Jörning; S R Joshi; P J Kitslaar; D W Slaaf; R S Reneman
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  1988-02       Impact factor: 12.969

10.  Challenges to setting spinal cord stimulator parameters during intraoperative testing: factors affecting coverage of low back and leg pain.

Authors:  Assaf T Gordon; Sheng Ping Zou; Yong Kim; Christopher Gharibo
Journal:  Neuromodulation       Date:  2007-04
View more
  1 in total

1.  Dissociation between reduced pain and arterial blood pressure following epidural spinal cord stimulation in patients with chronic pain: A retrospective study.

Authors:  Seth W Holwerda; Marshall T Holland; Alexander L Green; Amy C S Pearson; Gary L Pierce
Journal:  Clin Auton Res       Date:  2020-04-22       Impact factor: 4.435

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.