Literature DB >> 19961246

Unexpected neoplasia in autopsies: potential implications for tissue and organ safety.

Mary Ann Sens1, XuDong Zhou, Timothy Weiland, A Marvin Cooley.   

Abstract

CONTEXT: -Medical examiner cases are increasingly used as tissue donor referral sources to meet the ever-growing need for transplant tissues. The assumption is often made that traumatic and sudden deaths have minimal risk of unsuspected neoplasia. An autopsy of a registered tissue donor with strong preautopsy clinical assessment of a saddle pulmonary embolus revealed unsuspected acute lymphoblastic leukemia, prompting a review of the incidence of unsuspected neoplasia from a regional forensic autopsy practice.
OBJECTIVE: -To determine the incidence of (1) unsuspected neoplasia, (2) clinical concordance of known neoplasia, and (3) potential donor referral in a regional forensic autopsy service.
DESIGN: -A retrospective, 5-year review of 412 autopsies from a regional, primarily forensic, autopsy service to determine the incidence of unsuspected neoplasia, clinical concordance of known neoplasia, and the preautopsy assessment of potential donor referral suitability.
RESULTS: -Unsuspected neoplasia rate at autopsy was 7% (29 of 412 patients); cancer was the cause of death in 41% (12 of 29 patients) of these individuals. In patients with a history of cancer, the discordance of cancer diagnosis was 44% (4 of 9 patients [11 patients with known cancer, 2 who refused medical evaluation were excluded from the study]). Nearly 60% (17 of 29 patients) of the unsuspected cancer cases had no apparent reason for deferral of tissue procurement before the autopsy examination.
CONCLUSIONS: -The 7% incidence of unsuspected cancer in a forensic autopsy practice raises concern for the potential introduction of neoplastic tissue in the donor pool. To ensure the safety of this vital resource, mandatory complete autopsies on deceased donors are advocated as well as a tissue-recipient registry to track donor-related neoplasia.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19961246     DOI: 10.5858/133.12.1923

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Arch Pathol Lab Med        ISSN: 0003-9985            Impact factor:   5.534


  5 in total

1.  Regional Variation of Computed Tomographic Imaging in the United States and the Risk of Nephrectomy.

Authors:  H Gilbert Welch; Jonathan S Skinner; Florian R Schroeck; Weiping Zhou; William C Black
Journal:  JAMA Intern Med       Date:  2018-02-01       Impact factor: 21.873

2.  Histopathologic Findings in Autopsies with Emphasis on Interesting and Incidental Findings-A Pathologist's Perspective.

Authors:  Sapna Patel; B R Rajalakshmi; G V Manjunath
Journal:  J Clin Diagn Res       Date:  2016-11-01

3.  Donor Cancer Transmission in Kidney Transplantation.

Authors:  Thomas E R Baudoux; Karine Gastaldello; Sandrine Rorive; Anwar Hamade; Nilufer Broeders; Joëlle L Nortier
Journal:  Kidney Int Rep       Date:  2016-09-29

Review 4.  Universal cancer screening: revolutionary, rational, and realizable.

Authors:  David A Ahlquist
Journal:  NPJ Precis Oncol       Date:  2018-10-29

Review 5.  Epidemiology of pancreatic cancer.

Authors:  Milena Ilic; Irena Ilic
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2016-11-28       Impact factor: 5.742

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.