BACKGROUND: The potential for negative screening to reduce smoking cessation and long-term abstinence is a concern in lung cancer screening. We examine whether consistently negative results during long-term participation in a lung cancer screening program reduce cessation or increase relapse. METHODS: Participants (N = 2,078) in the Early Lung Cancer Action Program received annual screenings and periodic smoking behavior surveys over a follow-up period as long as 12 years. Point abstinence and prolonged abstinence were examined among 730 baseline smokers. Relapse was examined among 1,227 former smokers who quit for 1 year or more at enrollment, 121 recent quitters at enrollment, and 155 baseline smokers who quit during follow-up. Abstinence and relapse for participants with consistently negative computerized tomography scan results were compared with those with non-cancer-positive results using stratified Cox models. RESULTS: Baseline smokers with negative computerized tomography scans had a 28% lower likelihood of achieving point abstinence at one or more follow-up assessments compared with those with positive scans (hazard ratio, 0.72; P < 0.0004), but consistently negative scans were not associated with a lower likelihood of prolonged abstinence. A consistently negative scan was not associated with a higher likelihood of relapse back to smoking for long-term former smokers, recent quitters, or those who quit during follow-up. CONCLUSIONS: We did not detect a lower long-term smoking abstinence or increased relapse over a 6-year period of follow-up among individuals participating in a lung cancer screening program who have a consistently negative screening compared with those with a positive, but noncancer, screening result.
BACKGROUND: The potential for negative screening to reduce smoking cessation and long-term abstinence is a concern in lung cancer screening. We examine whether consistently negative results during long-term participation in a lung cancer screening program reduce cessation or increase relapse. METHODS:Participants (N = 2,078) in the Early Lung Cancer Action Program received annual screenings and periodic smoking behavior surveys over a follow-up period as long as 12 years. Point abstinence and prolonged abstinence were examined among 730 baseline smokers. Relapse was examined among 1,227 former smokers who quit for 1 year or more at enrollment, 121 recent quitters at enrollment, and 155 baseline smokers who quit during follow-up. Abstinence and relapse for participants with consistently negative computerized tomography scan results were compared with those with non-cancer-positive results using stratified Cox models. RESULTS: Baseline smokers with negative computerized tomography scans had a 28% lower likelihood of achieving point abstinence at one or more follow-up assessments compared with those with positive scans (hazard ratio, 0.72; P < 0.0004), but consistently negative scans were not associated with a lower likelihood of prolonged abstinence. A consistently negative scan was not associated with a higher likelihood of relapse back to smoking for long-term former smokers, recent quitters, or those who quit during follow-up. CONCLUSIONS: We did not detect a lower long-term smoking abstinence or increased relapse over a 6-year period of follow-up among individuals participating in a lung cancer screening program who have a consistently negative screening compared with those with a positive, but noncancer, screening result.
Authors: M Bade; V Bähr; U Brandt; A Eigentopf; T Brüchert; M-L Gross; E Motsch; N Becker Journal: J Cancer Res Clin Oncol Date: 2016-01-27 Impact factor: 4.553
Authors: Elyse R Park; Joanna M Streck; Ilana F Gareen; Jamie S Ostroff; Kelly A Hyland; Nancy A Rigotti; Hannah Pajolek; Mark Nichter Journal: Nicotine Tob Res Date: 2013-09-02 Impact factor: 4.244
Authors: Lisa M Fucito; Sharon Czabafy; Peter S Hendricks; Chris Kotsen; Donna Richardson; Benjamin A Toll Journal: Cancer Date: 2016-02-24 Impact factor: 6.860
Authors: Alana M Rojewski; Nichole T Tanner; Lin Dai; James G Ravenel; Mulugeta Gebregziabher; Gerard A Silvestri; Benjamin A Toll Journal: Chest Date: 2018-05-21 Impact factor: 9.410
Authors: Melissa A Clark; Jeremy J Gorelick; JoRean D Sicks; Elyse R Park; Amanda L Graham; David B Abrams; Ilana F Gareen Journal: Nicotine Tob Res Date: 2015-03-06 Impact factor: 4.244
Authors: Lauren R Meltzer; Marina Unrod; Vani N Simmons; Karen O Brandon; Bárbara Piñeiro; Amanda M Palmer; Thomas H Brandon Journal: Lung Cancer Date: 2019-02-18 Impact factor: 5.705
Authors: Samantha A Barry; Martin C Tammemagi; Sofiya Penek; Elisabeth C Kassan; Caroline S Dorfman; Thomas L Riley; John Commin; Kathryn L Taylor Journal: J Natl Cancer Inst Date: 2012-10-26 Impact factor: 13.506
Authors: Martin C Tammemägi; Christine D Berg; Thomas L Riley; Christopher R Cunningham; Kathryn L Taylor Journal: J Natl Cancer Inst Date: 2014-05-28 Impact factor: 13.506