Literature DB >> 19959257

[How are the websites of pharmaceutical companies directed at users?].

María Jesús López Hidalgo1, Alicia Aguado Gómez, Marceliana Sánchez Ruiz, Gregoria García-Moreno Rodríguez, Gemma Alejandre Lázaro.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To describe the content and structure of the websites of pharmaceutical companies (PC) with health information to patients.
DESIGN: Descriptive, cross-sectional. MAIN MEASUREMENTS: health topics treated, and 9 sections: objectives and target population; editorial policy, authoring, updating of content, personal data protection, interactivity, accessibility, advertising labels.
SETTING: Internet. PARTICIPANTS: All PC websites with patient health information in Spanish.
RESULTS: We studied 60 sites found. Most common: 19.3% neurology, mental health and 12% digestive diseases. Few specify the address of the person responsible for the site (51.7%), responsible for quality (10%) or the authors of the text (15%). Nearly 2/3 show the date of publication of content (66.7%), but only 13.3% updated. Privacy and data protection are mentioned in 65%, with only 28.3% allowing control of the use of personal data. Only 10% allow expressing doubts online and 1/3 of the sites have frequently asked questions. A total of 41.7% omitted to say their information does not replace medical advice. Educational materials (for children) can be downloaded in 11.7%. Almost all (93.3%) adapted their language to the recipient, but none are accessible to disabled people. The majority (86.7%) have the company logo on all pages. Only 16.7% are fronts for advertising, and only 9 sites have a quality seal (HONcode).
CONCLUSIONS: Pages are designed to give superficial information on a disease than directly advertise a particular brand or active ingredient. However, their reliability has to be low due to the authors and sources of information being unknown. If Internet health information was truthful and backed up by authors or appropriate information sources, the Internet could well be a genuine health education tool. Copyright 2009 Elsevier España, S.L. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19959257      PMCID: PMC7024491          DOI: 10.1016/j.aprim.2009.07.016

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Aten Primaria        ISSN: 0212-6567            Impact factor:   1.137


  6 in total

Review 1.  Published criteria for evaluating health related web sites: review.

Authors:  P Kim; T R Eng; M J Deering; A Maxfield
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1999-03-06

Review 2.  Examination of instruments used to rate quality of health information on the internet: chronicle of a voyage with an unclear destination.

Authors:  Anna Gagliardi; Alejandro R Jadad
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2002-03-09

Review 3.  How to find the good and avoid the bad or ugly: a short guide to tools for rating quality of health information on the internet.

Authors:  Petra Wilson
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2002-03-09

4.  Against internet exceptionalism.

Authors:  Sasha Shepperd; Deborah Charnock
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2002-03-09

5.  The Internet--a new medical problem or invaluable ally?

Authors:  Alan R Spitzer
Journal:  Pediatrics       Date:  2004-09       Impact factor: 7.124

6.  [Questionnaire to evaluate health web sites according to European criteria].

Authors:  Clara Bermúdez-Tamayo; Jaime Jiménez-Pernett; José Francisco García Gutiérrez; Inés Azpilicueta Cengotitobengoa; Martha Milena Silva-Castro; Gastón Babio; Juncal Plazaola Castaño
Journal:  Aten Primaria       Date:  2006-09-30       Impact factor: 1.137

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.