OBJECTIVES: To design a questionnaire to evaluate compliance with quality criteria on health web sites and to analyse its reliability. DESIGN: A descriptive study on the reliability of a questionnaire. PARTICIPANTS: Twenty web sites on health topics. SETTING: Internet. MAIN MEASUREMENTS: The questionnaire was based on analysis of content of the criteria of the e-Europe 2002 code of conduct, comparing these with the criteria underlying the AMA, the Summit code and the e-Health Code of Ethics regulations and current directives. The dimensions studied were transparency, absence of conflicts of interest, authorship, data protection, updating, accountability, and accessibility. A preliminary questionnaire was drawn up for a pilot test conducted by 3 researchers for 20 web sites, its reliability was appraised, adjustments were made and the definitive questionnaire was designed. Reliability was evaluated again for 26 web sites evaluated by 3 researchers. To evaluate concordance in the answers of the participants, Cohen's Kappa index with a 95% confidence level was used. RESULTS: All the quality directives of e-Europe 2002, the European regulations and relevant points from other questionnaires were included in the questionnaire designed. Reliability was acceptable (kappa > or = 0.60) for 12 of the 18 quality criteria included. The least concordant aspects of the questionnaire were information update (kappa = 0.310) and accessibility (search for contents and access for persons with disability). CONCLUSIONS: Reliability of the questionnaire designed was acceptable.
OBJECTIVES: To design a questionnaire to evaluate compliance with quality criteria on health web sites and to analyse its reliability. DESIGN: A descriptive study on the reliability of a questionnaire. PARTICIPANTS: Twenty web sites on health topics. SETTING: Internet. MAIN MEASUREMENTS: The questionnaire was based on analysis of content of the criteria of the e-Europe 2002 code of conduct, comparing these with the criteria underlying the AMA, the Summit code and the e-Health Code of Ethics regulations and current directives. The dimensions studied were transparency, absence of conflicts of interest, authorship, data protection, updating, accountability, and accessibility. A preliminary questionnaire was drawn up for a pilot test conducted by 3 researchers for 20 web sites, its reliability was appraised, adjustments were made and the definitive questionnaire was designed. Reliability was evaluated again for 26 web sites evaluated by 3 researchers. To evaluate concordance in the answers of the participants, Cohen's Kappa index with a 95% confidence level was used. RESULTS: All the quality directives of e-Europe 2002, the European regulations and relevant points from other questionnaires were included in the questionnaire designed. Reliability was acceptable (kappa > or = 0.60) for 12 of the 18 quality criteria included. The least concordant aspects of the questionnaire were information update (kappa = 0.310) and accessibility (search for contents and access for persons with disability). CONCLUSIONS: Reliability of the questionnaire designed was acceptable.
Authors: Funda Meric; Elmer V Bernstam; Nadeem Q Mirza; Kelly K Hunt; Frederick C Ames; Merrick I Ross; Henry M Kuerer; Raphael E Pollock; Mark A Musen; S Eva Singletary Journal: BMJ Date: 2002-03-09
Authors: M A Winker; A Flanagin; B Chi-Lum; J White; K Andrews; R L Kennett; C D DeAngelis; R A Musacchio Journal: JAMA Date: 2000 Mar 22-29 Impact factor: 56.272
Authors: Maria del Carmen Conesa Fuentes; Enrique Aguinaga Ontoso; Juan José Hernández Morante Journal: Aten Primaria Date: 2010-03-20 Impact factor: 1.137
Authors: Andrea Vicente-Neira; Virginia Prieto-Gómez; Beatriz Navarro-Brazález; Cristina Lirio-Romero; Javier Bailón-Cerezo; María Torres-Lacomba Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2022-01-28 Impact factor: 3.390
Authors: Nuria Rico-Sapena; María Eugenia Galiana-Sánchez; Joaquín Moncho Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2022-03-20 Impact factor: 3.390