Literature DB >> 19959192

Virtual pelvic anatomy simulator: a pilot study of usability and perceived effectiveness.

J Peyton Hassinger1, Eric J Dozois, Stefan D Holubar, Jon C Camp, David R Farley, Jeff L Fidler, Wojciech Pawlina, Richard A Robb, David W Larson.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Simulators for surgical education are in high demand due to new curriculum requirements for surgical residency accreditation. Our aim was to assess the usability and perceived effectiveness of a three-dimensional (3-D) pelvic anatomy teaching module derived from human magnetic resonance and computerized tomography images.
METHODS: A convenience sample of medical students and surgery residents was surveyed. Results are frequency (proportion) of respondents who agreed or strongly agreed with each statement.
RESULTS: Ten participants (5 medical students, 5 surgical residents) completed the survey. At baseline, a minority (30%) self-reported a very good knowledge of pelvic anatomy; none reported excellent knowledge of pelvic anatomy. All participants agreed that the module teaches clinically relevant anatomy; 90% preferred this type of education to traditional methods. Fifty percent of participants felt the module needed a higher level of anatomic detail. Participants specifically requested inclusion of Denonvillier's and Waldeyer's fascia, and the component muscles of the pelvic floor.
CONCLUSIONS: These pilot results suggest that our 3-D pelvic anatomy teaching module is easy to use and would enhance student learning of anatomy over traditional methods in an effective manner. Further study is warranted to assess the incremental impact of this and standard educational interventions for teaching surgical anatomy. Copyright (c) 2010 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19959192     DOI: 10.1016/j.jss.2009.06.016

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Surg Res        ISSN: 0022-4804            Impact factor:   2.192


  6 in total

1.  TEP and Lichtenstein anatomy: does simulation accelerate acquisition among interns?

Authors:  P G Rowse; R K Ruparel; J M Abdelsattar; Y N AlJamal; B M Dy; D R Farley
Journal:  Hernia       Date:  2015-08-04       Impact factor: 4.739

2.  Transcanal Computed Tomography Views for Transcanal Endoscopic Lateral Skull Base Surgery: Pilot Cadaveric Study.

Authors:  Rory J Lubner; Samuel R Barber; Renata M Knoll; Judith Kempfle; Daniel J Lee; Katherine L Reinshagen; Aaron K Remenschneider; Elliott D Kozin
Journal:  J Neurol Surg B Skull Base       Date:  2019-11-07

3.  Pelvis Anatomy Tutorial Using Radiological Images.

Authors:  Madeleine J Marsland; Dunya Tomic; Pamela L Brian; Michelle D Lazarus
Journal:  MedEdPORTAL       Date:  2018-11-28

Review 4.  Does three-dimensional anatomy improve student understanding?

Authors:  Charlotte P R Triepels; Carlijn F A Smeets; Kim J B Notten; Roy F P M Kruitwagen; Jurgen J Futterer; Tineke F M Vergeldt; Sander M J Van Kuijk
Journal:  Clin Anat       Date:  2019-05-31       Impact factor: 2.414

5.  Current and future role of three-dimensional modelling technology in rectal cancer surgery: A systematic review.

Authors:  Anna Przedlacka; Gianluca Pellino; Jordan Fletcher; Fernando Bello; Paris P Tekkis; Christos Kontovounisios
Journal:  World J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2021-12-27

6.  Utility of 3D printed models as adjunct in acetabular fracture teaching for Orthopaedic trainees.

Authors:  S Goyal; Cxk Chua; Y S Chen; D Murphy; G K O 'Neill
Journal:  BMC Med Educ       Date:  2022-08-02       Impact factor: 3.263

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.