Literature DB >> 19959116

Pulmonary vein isolation after circumferential pulmonary vein ablation: comparison between Lasso and three-dimensional electroanatomical assessment of complete electrical disconnection.

Giuseppe Augello1, Gabriele Vicedomini, Massimo Saviano, Simonetta Crisa, Patrizio Mazzone, Ombretta Ornago, Francesca Zuffada, Vincenzo Santinelli, Carlo Pappone.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) is one of the common endpoints of all atrial fibrillation (AF) ablation procedures and is most often validated using a preshaped circular catheter. However, three-dimensional (3D) electroanatomical systems used for anatomy reconstruction and to guide coalescent delivery of ablation lesions avoid the use of multiple transeptal punctures and multiple catheters in the left atrium.
OBJECTIVE: To assess correspondence in PVI validation between a 3D electroanatomical system and a Lasso catheter.
METHODS: Twenty-five patients affected by nonpermanent AF were enrolled after giving informed consent. After ablation of all four pulmonary vein (PV) ostia, encircled areas were extensively mapped (15 +/- 5 points acquired for each PV ostium) to assess the absence of any electrical activity conducted from the left atrium to the PV. At the end of the procedure, the physician performing the ablation procedure judged the complete versus incomplete PVI according to Carto/ablation catheter mapping during coronary sinus pacing. Thereafter, a second operator blinded to the result of the ablation procedure positioned a preshaped Lasso catheter in each PV ostium and annotated complete/incomplete PVI during pacing from the coronary sinus.
RESULTS: PVI as assessed with CARTO was 100% concordant with Lasso evaluation of PVI. Fluoroscopic times were 2.5 +/- 0.9 minutes to complete circumferential PV ablation and 5.5 +/- 1.9 minutes to properly position the Lasso catheter. No acute complications were reported in this series of patients.
CONCLUSIONS: PVI assessment using a 3D electroanatomical system is as accurate as Lasso evaluation, with excellent concordance.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19959116     DOI: 10.1016/j.hrthm.2009.09.008

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Heart Rhythm        ISSN: 1547-5271            Impact factor:   6.343


  8 in total

Review 1.  2012 HRS/EHRA/ECAS expert consensus statement on catheter and surgical ablation of atrial fibrillation: recommendations for patient selection, procedural techniques, patient management and follow-up, definitions, endpoints, and research trial design.

Authors:  Hugh Calkins; Karl Heinz Kuck; Riccardo Cappato; Josep Brugada; A John Camm; Shih-Ann Chen; Harry J G Crijns; Ralph J Damiano; D Wyn Davies; John DiMarco; James Edgerton; Kenneth Ellenbogen; Michael D Ezekowitz; David E Haines; Michel Haissaguerre; Gerhard Hindricks; Yoshito Iesaka; Warren Jackman; Jose Jalife; Pierre Jais; Jonathan Kalman; David Keane; Young-Hoon Kim; Paulus Kirchhof; George Klein; Hans Kottkamp; Koichiro Kumagai; Bruce D Lindsay; Moussa Mansour; Francis E Marchlinski; Patrick M McCarthy; J Lluis Mont; Fred Morady; Koonlawee Nademanee; Hiroshi Nakagawa; Andrea Natale; Stanley Nattel; Douglas L Packer; Carlo Pappone; Eric Prystowsky; Antonio Raviele; Vivek Reddy; Jeremy N Ruskin; Richard J Shemin; Hsuan-Ming Tsao; David Wilber
Journal:  J Interv Card Electrophysiol       Date:  2012-03       Impact factor: 1.900

2.  Remote magnetic navigation for circumferential pulmonary vein ablation: single-catheter technique or additional use of a circular mapping catheter?

Authors:  Dirk Vollmann; Lars Lüthje; Joachim Seegers; Christian Sohns; Samuel Sossalla; Jan Sohns; Christian Röver; Gerd Hasenfuß; Markus Zabel
Journal:  J Interv Card Electrophysiol       Date:  2014-06-04       Impact factor: 1.900

3.  Predicting Late Recurrence of Atrial Fibrillation After Radiofrequency Ablation in Patients With Atrial Fibrillation: Comparison of C2HEST and HATCH Scores.

Authors:  Jingjing Han; Guangling Li; Demei Zhang; Xiaomei Wang; Xueya Guo
Journal:  Front Cardiovasc Med       Date:  2022-06-21

4.  Single-ring ablation compared with standard circumferential pulmonary vein isolation using remote magnetic catheter navigation.

Authors:  Christian Sohns; Leonard Bergau; Joachim Seegers; Lars Lüthje; Dirk Vollmann; Markus Zabel
Journal:  J Interv Card Electrophysiol       Date:  2014-06-19       Impact factor: 1.900

5.  Association between functional mitral regurgitation and recurrence of paroxysmal atrial fibrillation following catheter ablation: a prospective cohort study.

Authors:  Fusheng Ke; Yinhui Huang; Zhexiu Jin; Lei Huang; Qiang Xiong; Fang Jia; Yu Chen; Gang Chen
Journal:  J Int Med Res       Date:  2021-05       Impact factor: 1.671

6.  Remote magnetic versus manual catheter navigation for circumferential pulmonary vein ablation in patients with atrial fibrillation.

Authors:  Lars Lüthje; Dirk Vollmann; Joachim Seegers; Marc Dorenkamp; Christian Sohns; Gerd Hasenfuss; Markus Zabel
Journal:  Clin Res Cardiol       Date:  2011-06-25       Impact factor: 5.460

Review 7.  Pulmonary Vein Isolation Lesion Set Assessment During Radiofrequency Catheter Ablation for Atrial Fibrillation.

Authors:  Edward Sze; Tristram D Bahnson
Journal:  J Innov Card Rhythm Manag       Date:  2017-02-15

8.  High-density Mapping Guided Pulmonary Vein Isolation for Treatment of Atrial Fibrillation - Two-year clinical outcome of a single center experience.

Authors:  J Siebermair; B Neumann; F Risch; L Riesinger; N Vonderlin; M Koehler; K Lackermaier; S Fichtner; K Rizas; S M Sattler; M F Sinner; S Kääb; H L Estner; R Wakili
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2019-06-20       Impact factor: 4.379

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.