BACKGROUND: Pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) is one of the common endpoints of all atrial fibrillation (AF) ablation procedures and is most often validated using a preshaped circular catheter. However, three-dimensional (3D) electroanatomical systems used for anatomy reconstruction and to guide coalescent delivery of ablation lesions avoid the use of multiple transeptal punctures and multiple catheters in the left atrium. OBJECTIVE: To assess correspondence in PVI validation between a 3D electroanatomical system and a Lasso catheter. METHODS: Twenty-five patients affected by nonpermanent AF were enrolled after giving informed consent. After ablation of all four pulmonary vein (PV) ostia, encircled areas were extensively mapped (15 +/- 5 points acquired for each PV ostium) to assess the absence of any electrical activity conducted from the left atrium to the PV. At the end of the procedure, the physician performing the ablation procedure judged the complete versus incomplete PVI according to Carto/ablation catheter mapping during coronary sinus pacing. Thereafter, a second operator blinded to the result of the ablation procedure positioned a preshaped Lasso catheter in each PV ostium and annotated complete/incomplete PVI during pacing from the coronary sinus. RESULTS: PVI as assessed with CARTO was 100% concordant with Lasso evaluation of PVI. Fluoroscopic times were 2.5 +/- 0.9 minutes to complete circumferential PV ablation and 5.5 +/- 1.9 minutes to properly position the Lasso catheter. No acute complications were reported in this series of patients. CONCLUSIONS: PVI assessment using a 3D electroanatomical system is as accurate as Lasso evaluation, with excellent concordance.
BACKGROUND: Pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) is one of the common endpoints of all atrial fibrillation (AF) ablation procedures and is most often validated using a preshaped circular catheter. However, three-dimensional (3D) electroanatomical systems used for anatomy reconstruction and to guide coalescent delivery of ablation lesions avoid the use of multiple transeptal punctures and multiple catheters in the left atrium. OBJECTIVE: To assess correspondence in PVI validation between a 3D electroanatomical system and a Lasso catheter. METHODS: Twenty-five patients affected by nonpermanent AF were enrolled after giving informed consent. After ablation of all four pulmonary vein (PV) ostia, encircled areas were extensively mapped (15 +/- 5 points acquired for each PV ostium) to assess the absence of any electrical activity conducted from the left atrium to the PV. At the end of the procedure, the physician performing the ablation procedure judged the complete versus incomplete PVI according to Carto/ablation catheter mapping during coronary sinus pacing. Thereafter, a second operator blinded to the result of the ablation procedure positioned a preshaped Lasso catheter in each PV ostium and annotated complete/incomplete PVI during pacing from the coronary sinus. RESULTS: PVI as assessed with CARTO was 100% concordant with Lasso evaluation of PVI. Fluoroscopic times were 2.5 +/- 0.9 minutes to complete circumferential PV ablation and 5.5 +/- 1.9 minutes to properly position the Lasso catheter. No acute complications were reported in this series of patients. CONCLUSIONS: PVI assessment using a 3D electroanatomical system is as accurate as Lasso evaluation, with excellent concordance.
Authors: Hugh Calkins; Karl Heinz Kuck; Riccardo Cappato; Josep Brugada; A John Camm; Shih-Ann Chen; Harry J G Crijns; Ralph J Damiano; D Wyn Davies; John DiMarco; James Edgerton; Kenneth Ellenbogen; Michael D Ezekowitz; David E Haines; Michel Haissaguerre; Gerhard Hindricks; Yoshito Iesaka; Warren Jackman; Jose Jalife; Pierre Jais; Jonathan Kalman; David Keane; Young-Hoon Kim; Paulus Kirchhof; George Klein; Hans Kottkamp; Koichiro Kumagai; Bruce D Lindsay; Moussa Mansour; Francis E Marchlinski; Patrick M McCarthy; J Lluis Mont; Fred Morady; Koonlawee Nademanee; Hiroshi Nakagawa; Andrea Natale; Stanley Nattel; Douglas L Packer; Carlo Pappone; Eric Prystowsky; Antonio Raviele; Vivek Reddy; Jeremy N Ruskin; Richard J Shemin; Hsuan-Ming Tsao; David Wilber Journal: J Interv Card Electrophysiol Date: 2012-03 Impact factor: 1.900
Authors: Dirk Vollmann; Lars Lüthje; Joachim Seegers; Christian Sohns; Samuel Sossalla; Jan Sohns; Christian Röver; Gerd Hasenfuß; Markus Zabel Journal: J Interv Card Electrophysiol Date: 2014-06-04 Impact factor: 1.900
Authors: Christian Sohns; Leonard Bergau; Joachim Seegers; Lars Lüthje; Dirk Vollmann; Markus Zabel Journal: J Interv Card Electrophysiol Date: 2014-06-19 Impact factor: 1.900
Authors: Lars Lüthje; Dirk Vollmann; Joachim Seegers; Marc Dorenkamp; Christian Sohns; Gerd Hasenfuss; Markus Zabel Journal: Clin Res Cardiol Date: 2011-06-25 Impact factor: 5.460
Authors: J Siebermair; B Neumann; F Risch; L Riesinger; N Vonderlin; M Koehler; K Lackermaier; S Fichtner; K Rizas; S M Sattler; M F Sinner; S Kääb; H L Estner; R Wakili Journal: Sci Rep Date: 2019-06-20 Impact factor: 4.379