BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: This study establishes a pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic (PK/PD) model to describe the time course and in vivo mechanisms of action of the antinociceptive effects of lumiracoxib, evaluated by the thermal hyperalgesia test in rats. EXPERIMENTAL APPROACH: Female Wistar fasted rats were injected s.c. with saline or carrageenan in the right hind paw, followed by either 0, 1, 3, 10 or 30 mg*kg(-1) of oral lumiracoxib at the time of carrageenan injection (experiment I), or 0, 10 or 30 mg*kg(-1) oral lumiracoxib at 4 h after carrageenan injection (experiment II). Antihyperalgesic responses were measured as latency time (LT) to a thermal stimulus. PK/PD modelling of the antinociceptive response was performed using the population approach with NONMEM VI. RESULTS: A two-compartment model described the plasma disposition. A first-order model, including lag time and decreased relative bioavailability as a function of the dose, described the absorption process. The response model was: LT=LT(0)/(1 +MED). LT(0) is the baseline response, and MED represents the level of inflammatory mediators. The time course of MED was assumed to be equivalent to the predicted profile of COX-2 activity and was modelled according to an indirect response model with a time variant synthesis rate. Drug effects were described as a reversible inhibition of the COX-2 activity. The in vivo estimate of the dissociation equilibrium constant of the COX-2-lumiracoxib complex was 0.24 microg*mL(-1). CONCLUSIONS: The model developed appropriately described the time course of pharmacological responses to lumiracoxib, in terms of its mechanism of action and pharmacokinetics.
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: This study establishes a pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic (PK/PD) model to describe the time course and in vivo mechanisms of action of the antinociceptive effects of lumiracoxib, evaluated by the thermal hyperalgesia test in rats. EXPERIMENTAL APPROACH: Female Wistar fasted rats were injected s.c. with saline or carrageenan in the right hind paw, followed by either 0, 1, 3, 10 or 30 mg*kg(-1) of oral lumiracoxib at the time of carrageenan injection (experiment I), or 0, 10 or 30 mg*kg(-1) oral lumiracoxib at 4 h after carrageenan injection (experiment II). Antihyperalgesic responses were measured as latency time (LT) to a thermal stimulus. PK/PD modelling of the antinociceptive response was performed using the population approach with NONMEM VI. RESULTS: A two-compartment model described the plasma disposition. A first-order model, including lag time and decreased relative bioavailability as a function of the dose, described the absorption process. The response model was: LT=LT(0)/(1 +MED). LT(0) is the baseline response, and MED represents the level of inflammatory mediators. The time course of MED was assumed to be equivalent to the predicted profile of COX-2 activity and was modelled according to an indirect response model with a time variant synthesis rate. Drug effects were described as a reversible inhibition of the COX-2 activity. The in vivo estimate of the dissociation equilibrium constant of the COX-2-lumiracoxib complex was 0.24 microg*mL(-1). CONCLUSIONS: The model developed appropriately described the time course of pharmacological responses to lumiracoxib, in terms of its mechanism of action and pharmacokinetics.
Authors: J L Goldstein; P Correa; W W Zhao; A M Burr; R C Hubbard; K M Verburg; G S Geis Journal: Am J Gastroenterol Date: 2001-04 Impact factor: 10.864
Authors: M Josa; J P Urizar; J Rapado; C Dios-Viéitez; G Castañeda-Hernández; F Flores-Murrieta; M J Renedo; I F Trocóniz Journal: J Pharmacol Exp Ther Date: 2001-04 Impact factor: 4.030
Authors: C Bombardier; L Laine; A Reicin; D Shapiro; R Burgos-Vargas; B Davis; R Day; M B Ferraz; C J Hawkey; M C Hochberg; T K Kvien; T J Schnitzer Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2000-11-23 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: A R Evans; H Junger; M D Southall; G D Nicol; L S Sorkin; J T Broome; T W Bailey; M R Vasko Journal: J Pharmacol Exp Ther Date: 2000-06 Impact factor: 4.030
Authors: Dennis W Thomas; Paulo N Rocha; Chandra Nataraj; Lisa A Robinson; Robert F Spurney; Beverly H Koller; Thomas M Coffman Journal: J Immunol Date: 2003-12-15 Impact factor: 5.422
Authors: Nieves Vélez de Mendizábal; Dalia Vásquez-Bahena; Juan M Jiménez-Andrade; Mario I Ortiz; Gilberto Castañeda-Hernández; Iñaki F Trocóniz Journal: AAPS J Date: 2012-09-12 Impact factor: 4.009