Literature DB >> 11381046

Refractive errors and incident cataracts: the Beaver Dam Eye Study.

T Y Wong1, B E Klein, R Klein, S C Tomany, K E Lee.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To describe the relation between refractive errors and incident age-related cataracts in a predominantly white US population.
METHODS: All persons aged 43 to 84 years of age in Beaver Dam, Wisconsin, were invited for a baseline examination from 1988 through 1990 and a follow-up examination 5 years later from 1993 through 1995. At both examinations, participants had refraction and photographic assessment of cataract, according to a standardized protocol. Myopia was defined as a spherical equivalent of -1.0 diopters (D) or less, hyperopia as +1.0 D or more. The relations between refractive errors at baseline and cataract at baseline (prevalent cataract), 5-year incident cataract, and incident cataract surgery were analyzed by using generalized estimating equations.
RESULTS: When age and gender were controlled for, myopia was related to prevalent nuclear cataract (odds ratio [OR], 1.67; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.23-2.27), but not to cortical and posterior subcapsular cataracts. Myopia was not related to 5-year incident nuclear, cortical, and posterior subcapsular cataracts, but was related to incident cataract surgery (OR 1.89; CI 1.18-3.04). Hyperopia was related to incident nuclear (OR 1.56; CI 1.25-1.95) and possibly cortical (OR 1.25; CI 0.96-1.63) cataracts, but not to posterior subcapsular cataract or cataract surgery. After further adjustment for diabetes, smoking, and education, the association between myopia and incident cataract surgery was attenuated (OR 1.60; CI 0.96-2.64), but the associations between hyperopia and incident nuclear and cortical cataracts were unchanged.
CONCLUSIONS: These data support the cross-sectional association between myopia and nuclear cataract seen in other population-based studies, but provide no evidence of a relationship between myopia and 5-year incident cataract. Hyperopia may be related weakly to incident nuclear and cortical cataract.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11381046

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci        ISSN: 0146-0404            Impact factor:   4.799


  31 in total

1.  How blinding is pathological myopia?

Authors:  S-M Saw
Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol       Date:  2006-05       Impact factor: 4.638

Review 2.  Gene profiling in experimental models of eye growth: clues to myopia pathogenesis.

Authors:  Richard A Stone; Tejvir S Khurana
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2010-04-02       Impact factor: 1.886

3.  Prentice Award Lecture 2010: A case for peripheral optical treatment strategies for myopia.

Authors:  Earl L Smith
Journal:  Optom Vis Sci       Date:  2011-09       Impact factor: 1.973

4.  Racial variations in the prevalence of refractive errors in the United States: the multi-ethnic study of atherosclerosis.

Authors:  Chen-Wei Pan; Barbara E K Klein; Mary Frances Cotch; Sandi Shrager; Ronald Klein; Aaron Folsom; Richard Kronmal; Steven J Shea; Gregory L Burke; Seang-Mei Saw; Tien Y Wong
Journal:  Am J Ophthalmol       Date:  2013-02-27       Impact factor: 5.258

5.  Is emmetropia the natural endpoint for human refractive development? An analysis of population-based data from the refractive error study in children (RESC).

Authors:  Ian G Morgan; Kathryn A Rose; Leon B Ellwein
Journal:  Acta Ophthalmol       Date:  2010-12       Impact factor: 3.761

6.  Oxidative responses induced by pharmacologic vitreolysis and/or long-term hyperoxia treatment in rat lenses.

Authors:  Qi Li; Hong Yan; Tian-Bing Ding; Jing Han; Ying-Bo Shui; David C Beebe
Journal:  Curr Eye Res       Date:  2013-03-27       Impact factor: 2.424

7.  Age, gender, biometry, refractive error, and the anterior chamber angle among Alaskan Eskimos.

Authors:  Robert Wojciechowski; Nathan Congdon; William Anninger; Aimee Teo Broman
Journal:  Ophthalmology       Date:  2003-02       Impact factor: 12.079

8.  Evaluation of refractive error after cataract surgery in highly myopic eyes.

Authors:  Tae Yokoi; Muka Moriyama; Kengo Hayashi; Noriaki Shimada; Kyoko Ohno-Matsui
Journal:  Int Ophthalmol       Date:  2013-01-12       Impact factor: 2.031

9.  Refractive error changes in cortical, nuclear, and posterior subcapsular cataracts.

Authors:  K Pesudovs; D B Elliott
Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol       Date:  2003-08       Impact factor: 4.638

10.  The probable associations for corticocapsular adhesions in patients undergoing cataract surgery: a clinic-based observational study.

Authors:  Abhay R Vasavada; Shetal M Raj; M R Praveen; Viraj A Vasavada; Vaishali A Vasavada
Journal:  Indian J Ophthalmol       Date:  2008 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 1.848

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.