Literature DB >> 19955296

Cutaneous afferents from the monkeys fingers: responses to tangential and normal forces.

H E Wheat1, L M Salo, A W Goodwin.   

Abstract

Control of tangential force plays a key role in everyday manipulations. In anesthetized monkeys, forces tangential to the skin were applied at a range of magnitudes comparable to those used in routine manipulations and in eight different directions. The paradigm used enabled separation of responses to tangential force from responses to the background normal force. For slowly adapting type I (SAI) afferents, tangential force responses ranged from excitatory through no response to suppression, with both a static and dynamic component. For fast adapting type I (FAI) afferents, responses were dynamic and excitatory only. Responses of both afferent types were scaled by tangential force magnitude, elucidating the neural basis for previous human psychophysical scaling data. Most afferents were direction selective with a range of preferred directions and a range in sharpness of tuning. Both the preferred direction and the degree of tuning were independent of the background normal force. Preferred directions were distributed uniformly over 360 degrees for SAI afferents, but for FAI afferents they were biased toward the proximo-ulnar direction. Afferents from all over the glabrous skin of the distal segment of the finger responded; there was no evident relationship between the position of an afferent's receptive field on the finger and its preferred direction or its degree of tuning. Nor were preferred directions biased either toward or away from the receptive field center. In response to the relatively large normal forces, some afferents saturated and others did not, regardless of the positions of their receptive fields. Total afferent response matched human psychophysical scaling functions for normal force.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19955296     DOI: 10.1152/jn.00502.2009

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurophysiol        ISSN: 0022-3077            Impact factor:   2.714


  12 in total

1.  Neuronal activity in somatosensory cortex related to tactile exploration.

Authors:  Pascal Fortier-Poisson; Allan M Smith
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2015-10-14       Impact factor: 2.714

2.  Correlation of fingertip shear force direction with somatosensory cortical activity in monkey.

Authors:  Pascal Fortier-Poisson; Jean-Sébastien Langlais; Allan M Smith
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2015-10-14       Impact factor: 2.714

Review 3.  Neural Basis of Touch and Proprioception in Primate Cortex.

Authors:  Benoit P Delhaye; Katie H Long; Sliman J Bensmaia
Journal:  Compr Physiol       Date:  2018-09-14       Impact factor: 9.090

4.  Expectation of volitional arm movement has prolonged effects on the grip force exerted on a pinched object.

Authors:  Anvesh Naik; Satyajit Ambike
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2022-08-11       Impact factor: 2.064

5.  Tactile texture signals in primate primary somatosensory cortex and their relation to subjective roughness intensity.

Authors:  Stéphanie Bourgeon; Alexandra Dépeault; El-Mehdi Meftah; C Elaine Chapman
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2016-01-13       Impact factor: 2.714

Review 6.  The neural basis of tactile motion perception.

Authors:  Yu-Cheng Pei; Sliman J Bensmaia
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2014-09-24       Impact factor: 2.714

7.  Information about contact force and surface texture is mixed in the firing rates of cutaneous afferent neurons.

Authors:  Monica Liu; Aaron Batista; Sliman Bensmaia; Douglas J Weber
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2020-12-16       Impact factor: 2.714

8.  High-resolution imaging of skin deformation shows that afferents from human fingertips signal slip onset.

Authors:  Benoit P Delhaye; Ewa Jarocka; Allan Barrea; Jean-Louis Thonnard; Benoni Edin; Philippe Lefèvre
Journal:  Elife       Date:  2021-04-22       Impact factor: 8.140

9.  Tactile motion adaptation reduces perceived speed but shows no evidence of direction sensitivity.

Authors:  Sarah McIntyre; Alex O Holcombe; Ingvars Birznieks; Tatjana Seizova-Cajic
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-09-24       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Seeing and Feeling Motion: Canonical Computations in Vision and Touch.

Authors:  Christopher C Pack; Sliman J Bensmaia
Journal:  PLoS Biol       Date:  2015-09-29       Impact factor: 8.029

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.