Literature DB >> 19954982

Influence of posterior condylar offset on knee flexion after cruciate-sacrificing mobile-bearing total knee replacement: a prospective analysis of 410 consecutive cases.

T Bauer1, D Biau, M Colmar, X Poux, P Hardy, A Lortat-Jacob.   

Abstract

The range of motion of the knee joint after Total Knee Replacement (TKR) is a factor of great importance that determines the postoperative function of patients. Much enthusiasm has been recently directed towards the posterior condylar offset with some authors reporting increasing postoperative knee flexion with increasing posterior condylar offset and others who did not report any significant association. Patients undergoing primary total knee replacement were included in a prospective multicentre study and the effect of the posterior condylar offset on the postoperative knee flexion was assessed after adjusting for known influential factors. All knees were implanted by three senior orthopedist surgeons with the same cemented cruciate-sacrificing mobile-bearing implant and with identical surgical technique. Clinical data, active knee flexion and posterior condylar offset were recorded preoperatively and postoperatively at a minimal one year follow-up for all patients. Univariate and multivariate linear models were fitted to select independent predictors of the postoperative knee flexion. Four hundred and ten consecutive total knee replacements (379 patients) were included in the study. The mean preoperative knee flexion was 112°. The mean condylar offset was 28.3mm preoperatively and 29.4mm postoperatively. The mean postoperative knee flexion was 108°. No correlation was found between the posterior condylar offset or the tibial slope and the postoperative knee flexion. The most significant predictive factor for postoperative flexion after posterior-stabilized TKR without PCL retention was the preoperative range of flexion, with a linear effect.
Copyright © 2009 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19954982     DOI: 10.1016/j.knee.2009.11.001

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Knee        ISSN: 0968-0160            Impact factor:   2.199


  18 in total

Review 1.  [Importance of the tibial slope in knee arthroplasty].

Authors:  Silvan Wittenberg; Ufuk Sentuerk; Lisa Renner; Claude Weynandt; Carsten F Perka; Clemens Gwinner
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2020-01       Impact factor: 1.087

2.  Correlation between posterior offset of femoral condyles and sagittal slope of the tibial plateau.

Authors:  G Cinotti; P Sessa; F R Ripani; R Postacchini; R Masciangelo; G Giannicola
Journal:  J Anat       Date:  2012-09-05       Impact factor: 2.610

3.  Factors affecting the osteolysis around the components after posterior-stabilized total knee replacement arthroplasty.

Authors:  Chang Wan Kim; Seung Suk Seo; Jung Han Kim; Hyeong Joo Lee; Chang Rack Lee
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2014-06-11       Impact factor: 4.342

4.  Influence of sagittal plane component alignment on kinematics after total knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  Joyce Antony; Kevin Tetsworth; Erik Hohmann
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2016-04-16       Impact factor: 4.342

5.  Changes in femoral posterior condylar offset and knee flexion after PCL-substituting total knee arthroplasty: comparison of anterior and posterior referencing systems.

Authors:  Hyuksoo Han; Sohee Oh; Chong Bum Chang; Seung-Baik Kang
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2015-11-14       Impact factor: 4.342

6.  Do tibiofemoral contact point and posterior condylar offset influence outcome and range of motion in a mobile-bearing total knee arthroplasty?

Authors:  G J P Geijsen; P J C Heesterbeek; G van Stralen; P G Anderson; A B Wymenga
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2013-05-16       Impact factor: 4.342

7.  Patient-specific and intra-operatively modifiable factors assessed by computer navigation predict maximal knee flexion one year after TKA.

Authors:  Frank Lampe; Carlos J Marques; Franziska Fiedler; Anusch Sufi-Siavach; Ana I Carita; Georg Matziolis
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2016-04-29       Impact factor: 4.342

8.  Assessment of Limb Alignment and Component Placement After All Burr Robotic-Assisted TKA.

Authors:  Mukesh Laddha; Sahu Gaurav
Journal:  Indian J Orthop       Date:  2020-09-27       Impact factor: 1.251

9.  Effect of posterior condylar offset in post operative range of motion in cruciate retaining and sacrificing TKR: A comparative analysis.

Authors:  Goutham D V Goutham; Vijay Kumar Jain; Skand Sinha; Rajendra Kumar Arya
Journal:  J Orthop       Date:  2020-06-29

10.  Measurement of femoral posterior condylar offset and posterior tibial slope in normal knees based on 3D reconstruction.

Authors:  Liangxiao Bao; Shengwei Rong; Zhanjun Shi; Jian Wang; Yang Zhang
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2021-05-27       Impact factor: 2.362

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.