Literature DB >> 19953336

Improving the performance of performance measurement.

LeChauncy D Woodard, Laura A Petersen.   

Abstract

Mesh：

Year:  2010        PMID： 19953336      PMCID： PMC2837486          DOI： 10.1007/s11606-009-1198-z

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Gen Intern Med        ISSN： 0884-8734            Impact factor:   5.128


× No keyword cloud information.
  10 in total

Review 1.  Does pay-for-performance improve the quality of health care?

Authors:  Laura A Petersen; LeChauncy D Woodard; Tracy Urech; Christina Daw; Supicha Sookanan
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  2006-08-15       Impact factor: 25.391

2.  General internists' views on pay-for-performance and public reporting of quality scores: a national survey.

Authors:  Lawrence P Casalino; G Caleb Alexander; Lei Jin; R Tamara Konetzka
Journal:  Health Aff (Millwood)       Date:  2007 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 6.301

3.  Pay-for-performance: will the latest payment trend improve care?

Authors:  Meredith B Rosenthal; R Adams Dudley
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2007-02-21       Impact factor: 56.272

4.  6 EZ steps to improving your performance: (or how to make P4P pay 4U!).

Authors:  Rodney A Hayward; David M Kent
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2008-07-16       Impact factor: 56.272

5.  The unreliability of individual physician "report cards" for assessing the costs and quality of care of a chronic disease.

Authors:  T P Hofer; R A Hayward; S Greenfield; E H Wagner; S H Kaplan; W G Manning
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1999-06-09       Impact factor: 56.272

6.  Building a better quality measure: are some patients with 'poor quality' actually getting good care?

Authors:  Eve A Kerr; Dylan M Smith; Mary M Hogan; Timothy P Hofer; Sarah L Krein; Martin Bermann; Rodney A Hayward
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  2003-10       Impact factor: 2.983

7.  The unintended consequences of publicly reporting quality information.

Authors:  Rachel M Werner; David A Asch
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2005-03-09       Impact factor: 56.272

8.  Can choice of the sample population affect perceived performance: implications for performance assessment.

Authors:  Bruce E Landon; A James O'Malley; Thomas Keegan
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2010-02       Impact factor: 5.128

9.  Will hypertension performance measures used for pay-for-performance programs penalize those who care for medically complex patients?

Authors:  Laura A Petersen; Lechauncy D Woodard; Louise M Henderson; Tracy H Urech; Kenneth Pietz
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2009-06-01       Impact factor: 29.690

10.  Treatment intensification and risk factor control: toward more clinically relevant quality measures.

Authors:  Joseph V Selby; Connie S Uratsu; Bruce Fireman; Julie A Schmittdiel; Tiffany Peng; Nicolas Rodondi; Andrew J Karter; Eve A Kerr
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  2009-04       Impact factor: 2.983
  10 in total
  3 in total

1.  Effects of individual physician-level and practice-level financial incentives on hypertension care: a randomized trial.

Authors:  Laura A Petersen; Kate Simpson; Kenneth Pietz; Tracy H Urech; Sylvia J Hysong; Jochen Profit; Douglas A Conrad; R Adams Dudley; LeChauncy D Woodard
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2013-09-11       Impact factor: 56.272

2.  Perils and opportunities of comparative performance measurement.

Authors:  Jochen Profit; LeChauncy D Woodard
Journal:  Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med       Date:  2012-02

3.  Impact of clinical complexity on the quality of diabetes care.

Authors:  LeChauncy D Woodard; Cassie R Landrum; Tracy H Urech; Degang Wang; Salim S Virani; Laura A Petersen
Journal:  Am J Manag Care       Date:  2012-09       Impact factor: 2.229
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.