OBJECTIVE: Increased responsiveness to appetitive and reduced responsiveness to aversive anticipatory cues may be associated with dysfunction of the brain reward system in mania. Here we studied neural correlates of gain and loss expectation in mania using functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI). METHOD: Fifteen manic patients and 26 matched healthy control individuals performed a monetary incentive delay task, during which subjects anticipated to win or lose a varying amount of money. Varying both magnitude and valence (win, loss) of anticipatory cues allowed us to isolate the effects of magnitude, valence and expected value (magnitude-by-valence interaction). RESULTS: Response times and total gain amount did not differ significantly between groups. FMRI data indicated that the ventral striatum responded according to cued incentive magnitude in both groups, and this effect did not significantly differ between groups. However, a significant group difference was observed for expected value representation in the left lateral orbitofrontal cortex (OFC; BA 11 and 47). In this region, patients showed increasing BOLD responses during expectation of increasing gain and decreasing responses during expectation of increasing loss, while healthy subjects tended to show the inverse effect. In seven patients retested after remission OFC responses adapted to the response pattern of healthy controls. CONCLUSIONS: The observed alterations are consistent with a state-related affective processing bias during the expectation of gains and losses which may contribute to clinical features of mania, such as the enhanced motivation for seeking rewards and the underestimation of risks and potential punishments. (c) 2009 Wiley-Liss, Inc.
OBJECTIVE: Increased responsiveness to appetitive and reduced responsiveness to aversive anticipatory cues may be associated with dysfunction of the brain reward system in mania. Here we studied neural correlates of gain and loss expectation in mania using functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI). METHOD: Fifteen manicpatients and 26 matched healthy control individuals performed a monetary incentive delay task, during which subjects anticipated to win or lose a varying amount of money. Varying both magnitude and valence (win, loss) of anticipatory cues allowed us to isolate the effects of magnitude, valence and expected value (magnitude-by-valence interaction). RESULTS: Response times and total gain amount did not differ significantly between groups. FMRI data indicated that the ventral striatum responded according to cued incentive magnitude in both groups, and this effect did not significantly differ between groups. However, a significant group difference was observed for expected value representation in the left lateral orbitofrontal cortex (OFC; BA 11 and 47). In this region, patients showed increasing BOLD responses during expectation of increasing gain and decreasing responses during expectation of increasing loss, while healthy subjects tended to show the inverse effect. In seven patients retested after remission OFC responses adapted to the response pattern of healthy controls. CONCLUSIONS: The observed alterations are consistent with a state-related affective processing bias during the expectation of gains and losses which may contribute to clinical features of mania, such as the enhanced motivation for seeking rewards and the underestimation of risks and potential punishments. (c) 2009 Wiley-Liss, Inc.
Authors: Hilary P Blumberg; Nelson H Donegan; Charles A Sanislow; Susan Collins; Cheryl Lacadie; Pawel Skudlarski; Ralitza Gueorguieva; Robert K Fulbright; Thomas H McGlashan; John C Gore; John H Krystal Journal: Psychopharmacology (Berl) Date: 2005-10-26 Impact factor: 4.530
Authors: Paul A Keedwell; Chris Andrew; Steven C R Williams; Mick J Brammer; Mary L Phillips Journal: Biol Psychiatry Date: 2005-07-25 Impact factor: 13.382
Authors: Lori L Altshuler; Susan Y Bookheimer; Jennifer Townsend; Manuel A Proenza; Naomi Eisenberger; Fred Sabb; Jim Mintz; Mark S Cohen Journal: Biol Psychiatry Date: 2005-11-15 Impact factor: 13.382
Authors: Jana Wrase; Florian Schlagenhauf; Thorsten Kienast; Torsten Wüstenberg; Felix Bermpohl; Thorsten Kahnt; Anne Beck; Andreas Ströhle; Georg Juckel; Brian Knutson; Andreas Heinz Journal: Neuroimage Date: 2007-02-08 Impact factor: 6.556
Authors: Andreas Ströhle; Meline Stoy; Jana Wrase; Steffi Schwarzer; Florian Schlagenhauf; Michael Huss; Jakob Hein; Anke Nedderhut; Britta Neumann; Andreas Gregor; Georg Juckel; Brian Knutson; Ulrike Lehmkuhl; Michael Bauer; Andreas Heinz Journal: Neuroimage Date: 2007-10-04 Impact factor: 6.556
Authors: Michael P Caligiuri; Gregory G Brown; M J Meloy; Sonja C Eberson; Sandra S Kindermann; Larry R Frank; Lisa Eyler Zorrilla; James B Lohr Journal: Psychiatry Res Date: 2003-07-30 Impact factor: 3.222
Authors: Robin Nusslock; Eddie Harmon-Jones; Lauren B Alloy; Snezana Urosevic; Kim Goldstein; Lyn Y Abramson Journal: J Abnorm Psychol Date: 2012-07-09
Authors: A Manelis; C D Ladouceur; S Graur; K Monk; L K Bonar; M B Hickey; A C Dwojak; D Axelson; B I Goldstein; T R Goldstein; G Bebko; M A Bertocci; M K Gill; B Birmaher; M L Phillips Journal: Psychol Med Date: 2015-09-16 Impact factor: 7.723
Authors: Lauren B Alloy; Rachel E Bender; Wayne G Whitehouse; Clara A Wagner; Richard T Liu; David A Grant; Shari Jager-Hyman; Ashleigh Molz; James Y Choi; Eddie Harmon-Jones; Lyn Y Abramson Journal: J Abnorm Psychol Date: 2011-10-17
Authors: A Versace; C D Ladouceur; S Graur; H E Acuff; L K Bonar; K Monk; A McCaffrey; A Yendiki; A Leemans; M J Travis; V A Diwadkar; S K Holland; J L Sunshine; R A Kowatch; S M Horwitz; T W Frazier; L E Arnold; M A Fristad; E A Youngstrom; R L Findling; B I Goldstein; T Goldstein; D Axelson; B Birmaher; M L Phillips Journal: Neuropsychopharmacology Date: 2018-05-04 Impact factor: 7.853
Authors: Heather E Acuff; Amelia Versace; Michele A Bertocci; Cecile D Ladouceur; Lindsay C Hanford; Anna Manelis; Kelly Monk; Lisa Bonar; Alicia McCaffrey; Benjamin I Goldstein; Tina R Goldstein; Dara Sakolsky; David Axelson; Boris Birmaher; Mary L Phillips Journal: JAMA Psychiatry Date: 2018-12-01 Impact factor: 21.596
Authors: Genna Bebko; Michele A Bertocci; Jay C Fournier; Amanda K Hinze; Lisa Bonar; Jorge R C Almeida; Susan B Perlman; Amelia Versace; Claudiu Schirda; Michael Travis; Mary Kay Gill; Christine Demeter; Vaibhav A Diwadkar; Gary Ciuffetelli; Eric Rodriguez; Thomas Olino; Erika Forbes; Jeffrey L Sunshine; Scott K Holland; Robert A Kowatch; Boris Birmaher; David Axelson; Sarah M Horwitz; L Eugene Arnold; Mary A Fristad; Eric A Youngstrom; Robert L Findling; Mary L Phillips Journal: JAMA Psychiatry Date: 2014-01 Impact factor: 21.596