Literature DB >> 19949548

Gene expression and regulation of higher plants under soil water stress.

Fu-Tai Ni1, Li-Ye Chu, Hong-Bo Shao, Zeng-Hui Liu.   

Abstract

Higher plants not only provide human beings renewable food, building materials and energy, but also play the most important role in keeping a stable environment on earth. Plants differ from animals in many aspects, but the important is that plants are more easily influenced by environment than animals. Plants have a series of fine mechanisms for responding to environmental changes, which has been established during their long-period evolution and artificial domestication. The machinery related to molecular biology is the most important basis. The elucidation of it will extremely and purposefully promote the sustainable utilization of plant resources and make the best use of its current potential under different scales. This molecular mechanism at least includes drought signal recognition (input), signal transduction (many cascade biochemical reactions are involved in this process), signal output, signal responses and phenotype realization, which is a multi-dimension network system and contains many levels of gene expression and regulation. We will focus on the physiological and molecular adaptive machinery of plants under soil water stress and draw a possible blueprint for it. Meanwhile, the issues and perspectives are also discussed. We conclude that biological measures is the basic solution to solving various types of issues in relation to sustainable development and the plant measures is the eventual way.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Higher plants; anti-drought gene resources; drought; gene regulatory network; ion homeostasis; physiological mechanisms.; signal; soil water stress

Year:  2009        PMID: 19949548      PMCID: PMC2709938          DOI: 10.2174/138920209788488535

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Curr Genomics        ISSN: 1389-2029            Impact factor:   2.236


INTRODUCTION

Environmental stresses represent limiting factors for plant productivity on the globe. Drought is one of the important abiotic stresses, constraining global crop production and quality seriously and recent global climate change and increasingly erratic weather patterns in the future are likely to enhance this situation more seriously [1-11]. Abiotic stress factors mainly include temperature, salinity, drought, anaerobic, and mechanical stresses on plants. In most cases, soil water deficits directly result in drought, which is closely linked with natural rainfall [12-21]. Drought is a complex physical-chemical process, in which many biological macromolecules and small molecules are involved ,such as nucleic acids (DNA, RNA, microRNA), proteins, carbohydrates, lipids, hormones, ions, free radicals ,mineral elements [22-78]. In addition, drought is also related to salt stress, cold stress, high temperature stress, acid stress, alkaline stress, pathological reactions, senescence, growth, development, cell circle, UV-B damage, wounding, embryogenesis, flowering, signal transduction and so on [79-100], making the problem more complicated. The development and application of modern molecular biology have led to a better understanding of plant adaptations and responses to abiotic stress conditions. Genes responsible for adaptation processes to every example of given stress have been identified in Arabidopsis thaliana and other important model plants. The use of transgenic plants to overexpress or silence these genes is a powerful tool in determining if they are necessary or sufficient to induce stress tolerance. However, with stress tolerance being a quantitative character, it should not be expected that single genes confer a high level of corresponding tolerance [101-115]. Considering the interacting complexity (at least including water movement, solute transport, information exchange, ion homeostasis regulation, and other related physi-chemical changes) between plants and their surroundings, it is necessary to generalize the performance of physiological functions for higher plants under drought stress. In this article, related aspects of physiological and molecular responses of higher plants to drought stresses will be reviewed, mainly including the following parts: Plant Physiological Function Performance under Soil Water Stress, Plant Gene Regulatory Network System, A Model for Stress Signal Transduction Pathway in Higher Plants under abiotic Stresses, Pant Gene Regulatory Network System and Plant Drought Resistance Improvement. We then focus on the aspects of plant gene regulatory network system, which is the core controlling the interrelationship between plants and environment at the molecular level in a complex and coordinated manner.

PLANT PHYSIOLOGICAL FUNCTION PERFORMANCE IN FIELD UNDER SOIL WATER STRESS

Plants live in soil-plant-atmosphere continuum (SPAC) environment, and they have to coordinate the mechanisms of diverse types to respond to the above changing environment at any time for sustainable survival [1-9]. When abiotic-stress happened, the water in plants would be distributed again. And it could make the old leaf dead by the water movement from old leaf to new leaf, resulting in reduction of the yield of crops. Plant productivity realization is obtained eventually through physiological pathways at least at the level of individual and community [10-16]. One molecule, one kind of tissue or an organ can not produce any economic yield in terms of the need for human being [26-53]. Under the condition of ensuring plant survival, plants can produce corresponding yield. Soil water is one of key factors influencing plant production and many reports have proved this clearly [17-25]. Loss of water in soil will lead to great reduction in plant production, which has been reflected from total grain yield of many countries in the world [54-58]. Soil water is also the important material for photosynthetic reactions that plants depend on to finish accumulation of photosynthetic products, which are impacted greatly by physiological pathways and environmental factors (such as soil water supply) [59-64]. The influence of water deficits for plant metabolism is very apparent, which is mainly restraining the anabolism by reducing the activity of synthase and strengthening the catabolism by increasing the activity of hydrolytic enzymes. This includes the reduction of protein, chlorophyll, DNA, RNA and plant growth hormone synthesis, which could destroy the normal metabolism and cause growth disorder. So, different soil water supplying will result in quite different physiological pathways, which directly determine the ability for plants to make photosynthetic products. Water deficits in soil environment also influence solute transport (ion and nutrient uptake of plants) to larger extent, which effects on photosynthetic reactions in plant chloroplasts in many ways [65-71]. This is the reason that ion homeostasis and redox state have been brought to attention [72-76]. The series of the above reactions and processes occurring at different biointerfaces is regulated and controlled by plant gene regulatory network system spatially and temporally on the basis of responding to plant developmental cue, through which plants can elegantly respond to the changing environment [77-82]. This network system has been formed by the interaction between plants and environment for a long time of evolution, which will continue to evolve with environmental succession [83-86]. From the angle of individual plant development, Plant Growth Grand Periodicity curve can reflect and show the above trend, displaying higher plasticity [87-90]. Besides, plant responses to soil water deficits (including nutrients) take a “slow-fast-slow” shaped curve in terms of main physio-biochemical indices change and this is in agreement with Plant Growth Grand Periodicity, which also illustrates this fact and wide plasticity for plants [36-53]. Surely, concerted expression of corresponding genes in plant gene regulatory network system makes it possible that we can see the phenotype and phenotype change under given temporal-spatial condition [91-96].

PLANT GENE REGULATORY NETWORK SYSTEM UNDER ABIOTIC STRESSES

Recent progress in molecular biology and bioinformatics (especially, DNA microarray technology), genomics, proteomics, metabolomics and transcriptomics) has provided insight into plant gene regulatory network system, which is mainly composed of inducible-genes (environmental factors and developmental cues), their expression programming and regulatory elements (cis-element and trans-element), corresponding biochemical pathways and diverse signal factors [97-103]. The genetic information for drought tolerance is expressed in many prokaryotes and lower eukaryotes, but only in very few higher plants. In higher plants, only seeds can survive for extended periods without water. Exceptional among higher plants is the small group of angiosperm plants termed 'resurrection plants' which can recover from complete dryness within one day of contact with water [116]. Under the condition of soil water deficits, related stress factors always result in overlapping responses, including anatomical, physiological, biochemical, molecular biological changes, which make plant gene regulatory network system more complicated and difficult to explore. Much information with respect to this topic is from the model plant, Arabidopsis thaliana. Main aspects will be illustrated below.

Typical Environmental Stress-responsive Transcriptional Elements

Plants can sense, process, respond to environmental stress and activate related-gene expression toincrease their resistance to stress. Environmental stress-inducible genes can be mainly divided into two types in terms of their protein products: one type of genes, whose coding products directly confer the function of plant cells to resist to environmental stress such as LEA protein, antifreezing protein, osmotic regulatory protein, enzymes for synthesizing betaine, proline and other osmoregulators; the other type of genes, whose coding products play an important role in regulating gene expression and signal transduction such as the transcriptional elements for sensing and transducing the protein kinases of MAP and CDP, bZIP, MYB and others [103-105]. Though these stress genes could be induced, they have not tissue specificity. At the same time, the protein of most different genes coding drought-resistance is rich in Gly, Pro and other hydrophilic amino acids, but the content of Trp and Cys is lower than others. Li et al. (1997) found that the content of Pro was 38 percentage in the 41.5kD drought-induced-protein in wheat seedlings, but it had not Trp and Cys [117]. Transcriptional elements are defined as the protein combining with the specialized DNA sequence of eukaryotic promoters or the protein having structural characteristics of known DNA-combining region, whose main function is to activate or suppress transcriptional effect of corresponding genes [61-69]. It is a critical factor for the transduction of stress signal. The transcriptional elements would be synthesized under the stress, and it could deliver and amplify the signal to regulate the genes expression to change the physiological function performance. There are two kinds of transcriptional elements according to their characters of expression: first, constitutive transcription elements, which could express normally in stress such as HvCBF2 in barley [118, 119]; the other is an inducible transcription element, whose expression mainly occurs in stress environment. Most transcription elements are the second type. It is proved that there are four function domains by protein analysis: DNA-binding domain, transcriptional regulatory domain (including activation and inhibitory domains), oligomerization site and nuclear localization signal. These domains can regulate the gene expression with the function domains of other transcriptional elements or promoter cis-acting elements in specific time [120]. But there are not sufficient evidences to prove how these transcription elements regulate the target gene expression and depict a legible stress-signal-responsive system. Up to now, hundreds of transcriptional elements of environmental stress-responsive genes in higher plants have been isolated, which regulate and control the stress reaction related to drought, salinity, cold, pathogen and heat. In the genome of Arabidopsis and rice, they have about 1300-1500 genes for coding transcriptional elements, most of which have not been identified functionally. Recent study has shown that the transcriptional elements involved in plant stress responses mainly include four kinds: APETALA2/ EREBP, bZIP, WRKY, and MYB [70-79]. Some typical plant transcriptional elements have been summarized in Table for reference.

Complexity of Plant Gene Regulatory Network System: Specificity and Crosstalk

Many transcriptional element families participate in plant stress responses, each of which has many members with highly-conservative DNA-binding domain, composing a complicated, temporal-spatial network system for plant gene expression and regulation [81-86]. The specific amino acid sequence of DNA-binding domain decides the specificity of distinguishing and combining with cis-acting elements. Different members of TGA/OBF families have different DNA-binding specificity, protein-protein interaction and expressing profiles. Chromatin immunoprecipitation techniques indicated that tobacco TGA1a in vivo combined with xenobiotic-responsive promoters, but could not combine with PR promoter with as-1 cis-element [103-105]. Arabidopsis TGA2 could be responsive to SA signal, but not be responsive to xenobiotic stress signals. Much analysis of genomic expression profiling by DNA microarray indicates that the mRNA coding transcriptional element genes in many plants are usually induced to express and accumulated [91, 98]. Most transcriptional element genes involved in plant stress responses have not only completely different expression profiles, but also some overlapping expression profiles, showing the complexity, specificity and crosstalk of plant gene regulatory network system [58-63]. In other words, one kind of stress may simultaneously activate many transcriptional elements and one transcriptional element may be activated by many types of plant stress responses. For instance, CBF3/DREB1a can be responsive rapidly to cold, at the same time, regulated by circadian clock [71-78], which reflects the functional complement between plant cold-responsive pathway and circadian clock-regulated circle in terms of CBF3/DREB1a functions [36, 54, 88, 94-105]. The gene, SbPRP derived from 2-week-old soybean seedlings, encodes 126 amino acids, which have a signal peptide in N-terminal. It is mainly in leaf and epicotyl, and its transcription is regulated by water-stress, salt-stress and plant hormone at the same time [121]. Shinozaki et al. (2003) thought that four signal pathways regulating the gene expression were involved in plant drought, cold and salinity responses, in which two were ABA-dependent (I and II), and two were non-ABA-dependent (III and IV). The gene expression depends on ABA accumulation in plants, which would change with the content of ABA. There are some conservative ABA responsive elements in these genes, whose characteristic sequence is PyACGTG (G/T)C. It can regulate the stress gene expression induced by ABA. Yamaguchi-Shinozaki et al. (1989) found two conservative cis-acting elements, motif 1(GTACGTGGC) and motif 2(CGG/CCGCGCT) after comparing four rab16 gene promoters of rice. Through analysis they found that motif 1 is the cis-acting factor to ABA reaction [122-125]. The gene expression of non-ABA-dependent pathway would be affected by drought and cold beside ABA. It means that ABA is unnecessary for its expression. Some studies indicated that it had a DREB transcriptional element in non-ABA-dependent pathway, which can distinguish the DRE element in the gene promoter. DRE/CRT is a cis-acting element in higher plants to respond the drought and cold stress, whose characteristic sequence is CCGAC. There are many elements associated with DRE found now. It is proved that the involvement of these elements in the stress response is without depending on ABA-dependent gene expression [126-129]. The process of stress signal sensing and transducing, transcriptional regulating, and functional expressing was existent in these pathways [106-115]. Zhu T (2003) and Zhu JK (2000, 2003) concluded that molecular mechanism of plant stress responses (drought and salinity) included three main steps, i.e. stress signal input, transducing process, and regulatory product output through the study of Arabidopsis drought and salinity for many years. Results of many genetic mutants and key intermediate molecules from his lab supported his view powerfully. Recent related anti-drought data (dynamic change of anti-oxidative enzymes and soil water stress threshold) from my lab also proved the point [58-66]. From plant developmental context, plant responses to environmental stresses have a universal law, which has been reflected completely by Plant Growth Grand Periodicity curve. Our study on dynamic changing of wheat anti-oxidative enzymes under soil water deficit have indicated that wheat with different genotypes responded to soil water stress by taking a“ slow- rapid- slow” characteristic curve during wheat life cycle. This is the physiological basis for water-saving agriculture and dry land farming, which also provides substantial evidence for the above viewpoint [34, 37, 46, 49, 50, 91, 95, 103, 105-115].

A POSSIBLE MODEL FOR STRESS SIGNAL TRANSDUCTION PATHWAY IN HIGHER PLANTS UNDER ABIOTIC STRESSES

Animals must change their behavior to fit the living environment fluctuates. The same case happens on higher plants and sessile higher plants must also change behavior to increase fitness as the local environment fluctuates. A stronger spatial dimension network underlies signal transduction; for instance, and higher plants must be able to detect gradients in signals (such as light) and resources (such as nitrate and water). Higher plant development itself also is decidedly polar [7-11]. The spatial dimension is satisfied in many ways. Higher plant cells place receptors, channels, G proteins, and kinases, in specific membranes. Some signaling protein complexes are permanent, such as relatively stable and perhaps hardwired COP9 signalosome. Other signaling protein complexes are likely to be ephemeral and formed immediately as a result of signaling [12-16]. There are at least 300 receptor kinases in Arabidopsis, and most of them are membrane bound. Incompatibility and disease defense signal transduction use receptor kinases. After ligand binding and autophosphorylation, such kinases may act as nucleation sites for the construction of ephemeral signaling complexes that contain many proteins [21-25]. Although there are some differences in different higher plants, a common signal model for stress transduction pathway exist in higher plants [104-115] (Fig.). This model begins with the perception of signals from environments, followed by the generation of second messengers (such as inositol phosphates and reactive oxygen species). Second messnengers can modulate intracellular Ca2+ levels, often initiating a protein phosphorylation cascade that finally targets proteins directly involved in cellular protection or transcription factors controlling specific sets of stress-regulated genes. The products of these genes may participate in the production of regulatory molecules like the plant hormones abscisic acid (ABA), ethylene, and salicylic acid (SA). Some of these regulatory molecules can, in turn, initiate a second round of circulation.

PANT GENE REGULATORY NETWORK SYSTEM AND PLANT DROUGHT RESISTANCE IMPROVEMENT

Pant Gene Regulatory Network System is very complex. More information is obtained from the model plant, Arabidopsis thaliana. The transcriptional elements induced by stress signals decide which gene expression should be increased and the function of different transcriptional elements in plants is synergetic and complementary for each other. It is important to remember the fact that some transcriptional elements may regulate several metabolic pathways and one metabolic pathway may need orchestrated regulation from some transcriptional elements, which is the nature of plant gene regulatory network system [100-115]. So, in some cases, only introducing a transcriptional element can not obtain targeted phenotype and may lead to metabolic unbalance in plants. In addition, because of coordinated evolution of transcriptional elements and their regulating metabolic pathways the genetically-modifying strategy for the same transcriptional element could produce different phenotypes in different plant species. Besides, some transcriptional elements not only regulate metabolic pathways, but also influence transport and allocation of secondary metabolites. Plant secondary metabolism plays an important role in plant responding to environmental stresses. Long-step progress has taken place in terms of introducing transcriptional elements to regulate targeted pathways. These issues need deeper exploration to establish an efficient genetically-modifying system by transcriptional elements and their network system for improving plant stress resistance and global eco- environment and feeding the world [53-63]. Potential genes mediating resistance to soil water stress and related abiotic stress in plants have been listed in Table for reference. The plant stress resistance mainly depends on varying proteins directly. There are many kinds of anti-proteins upon water stress, but we must point out that, in evolutionary terms, the possibility of producing specific proteins normally is very low except seriously drought-stress. Changing the relative content of different proteins in plants is the main way for resisting the stress, which is reflected in many plants such as NADP-malic enzymes in wheat and rice. It has an internal molecular basic of the drought-resistance in the drought-resistance species [127-130].

CONCLUDING REMARKS AND PERSPECTIVES

Plants have more refine mechanisms to regulate themselves from molecular level to ecosystem to respond to environmental changing. For instance, there are many coding-protein genes downstream only for osmotic regulation in abiotic stress resistance (Table ). Plants are always in the state of passiveness for confronting environmental succession and the related issue is more complicated, which is the main cause that plants are behind animals in the study of most fields [52-56]. Charting plant gene regulatory network system under soil water deficits is a great challenge. Nowadays, there are indeed many favorable conditions for charting this blueprint, including much available data from Arabidopsis, rice, grass, yeast and fruit fly, but the range of tested plants is very much limited, many stress-responsive genes have not been unified in terms of their refine functions, and many genes participating in environmental stresses are interacted and overlapped, which have led to incorrect placing of key genes (gene effectors) and signal molecules in the whole plant gene regulatory network system. Besides, much data are from under condition of one type of stresses. It is a fact that plants always confront more than two kinds of individual environmental stresses or their combination simultaneously in field [91-115]. Although drawing this dimensional plant gene regulatory network system with great details and complete pathways is impossible currently, the basic draft for this blueprint could be summarized in Fig. (). This draft was established in combination with recent advance in this hot topic and from the context of development, which will provide instructions for further investigation and insights into understanding of plant refine plasticity for abiotic environmental stresses. In a word, precise elucidation of plant gene regulatory network system under abiotic stresses is of importance to molecularly engineering plant resistance, because of which many excellent scientists world-wide have been engaged in this frontier field, resulting in a long-step progress. There are also many issues remained to be solved and needed to make efforts. Scope of tested plants needs to be extended; comprehensive study on a combination of environmental stress factors in laboratories and in field should be given much attention; system development viewpoint and computer simulation analysis method should be also applied. The combination of molecular biology, biotechnology and plant physiology (especially in field) is also the key. With accumulation of data from being extended plant range, plant gene regulatory network system under environmental stresses will be clearer and clearer.
Table 1.

Typical Transcriptional Elements Related to Abiotic Stresses in Plants and Crops.

Plant MaterialsFactorsBinding Sites/Factor Types
Arabidopsis thalianaABI5/AtDPBFABA response elements(ABREs)/bZIP
A.thaliana AtDPBF2 ABA response elements(ABREs)/bZIP
A.thalianaAtDPBF3/AREB3ABA response elements(ABREs)/bZIP
A.thalianaAtDPBF4 ABA response elements(ABREs)/bZIP
A.thalianaAtDPBF5/ABF3ABA response elements(ABREs)/bZIP
A.thalianaABF1ABA response elements(ABREs)/bZIP
A.thaliana ABF2/AREB5 ABA response elements(ABREs)/bZIP
A.thaliana ABF4/AREB2 ABA response elements(ABREs)/bZIP
A.thaliana GBF3 ABA response elements(ABREs)/bZIP
A.thaliana AB53 RY/sph elements/B3 domain proteins
A.thaliana ATMTB2 MTC
A.thaliana ATHB6 HD-Zip
A.thaliana ATHB7 HD-Zip
A.thaliana ATHB12 HD-Zip
A.thaliana ABI4 AP2
Oryza TRAB1 ABA response elements(ABREs)/bZIP
Oryza OsVPI RY/sph elements/B3 domain proteins
Zea mays VP1 MYB
Triticum EmBP-1 ABA response elements(ABREs)/bZIP
Avena AtVPI RY/sph elements/B3 domain proteins
Helianthus DPBF5,-2,-3 ABA response elements(ABREs)/Bzip
Phaseolus ROM2(repressor) ABA response elements(ABREs)/Bzip
Phaseolus PIARF RY/sph elements/B3 domain proteins
Craterestinma Cpvp1 RY/sph elements/B3 domain proteins
Daucus C-ABI3 RY/sph elements/B3 domain proteins
Populus PtABI3 RY/sph elements/B3 domain proteins
Table 2.

Potential Genes Mediating Resistance to Soil Water Stress and Related Abiotic Stress in Plants

GeneGene ActionSpeciesPhenotype
adcPolyamine synthesisRice Drought resistance
Apo-Inv Apoplastic invertase Tobacco Salt tolerance, high “osmotic pressure”
AtGolS2 Galactinol and raffinose accumulation Arabidopsis Reduced transpiration
AtHAL3Phosphoprotein phosphataseTobaccoImproved salt, osmotic and Lithium tolerance of cell cultures
AtHAL3a Phosphoprotein phosphatase Arabidopsis Regulate salinity and osmotic tolerance and plant growth
ATP-PRTATP-phosphoribosyltransferaseAlyssumHis accumulation and Nickel tolerance
AtTPS1trehalose-6-phosphate synthaseTobaccoDrought resistance; sustained photosyntehsis
BADH-1 Betaine aldehyde dehydrogenase CarrotSalinity tolerance
BADH-1 Betaine aldehyde dehydrogenase RiceCd tolerance
BADH-1Betaine aldehyde dehydrogenaseMaizeSalinity tolerance
BADH-1Betaine aldehyde dehydrogenaseTobaccoHeat tolerance in photosynthesis
BADH-1Betaine aldehyde dehydrogenaseTobaccoSalinity tolerance
BADH-1 Betaine aldehyde dehydrogenase Tomato Maintenance of osmotic potential
betA Choline dehydrogenase (glycinebetaine synthesis)MaizeDrought resistance at seedling stage and high yieldafter drought
betA Choline dehydrogenase (glycinebetaine synthesis)Tobacco Increased tolerance to salinity stress
CHIT33, CHIT42Endochitinase synthesisTobaccoSalt and metal toxicity resistance (& disease)
CMOCholine monooxygenase (glycine betaine synthesis)TobaccoBetter in vito growth under salinity and osmotic (PEG6000) stress
codA Choline oxidase (glycine betaine synthesis) Arabidopsis Increased stress tolerance
codA Choline oxidase (glycine betaine synthesis) Arabidopsis Salt tolerance in terms of reproduction
codA Choline oxidase (glycine betaine synthesis) Arabidopsis Seedlings tolerant to salinity stress and increasedgermination under cold
codA Choline oxidase (glycine betaine synthesis) Brassica junceaTolerance to stress induced photoinhibition
codA Choline oxidase (glycine betaine synthesis) Rice Increased tolerance to salinity and cold
codA Choline oxidase (glycine betaine synthesis) Rice Recovery from a week long salt stress
codA Choline oxidase (glycine betaine synthesis) TobaccoFreezing toleance
codA Choline oxidase (glycine betaine synthesis) TomatoChilling tolerance in yield and oxidative stress tolerance
codA Choline oxidase (glycine betaine synthesis) TomatoChilling tolerance
COR15a Cold induced gene Arabidopsis Increased freezing tolerance
COXCholine oxidase (glycine betaine synthesis)RiceSalt and 'stress' tolerance
Ect A...ect CEdtoin accumulation in chloroplastsTobaccoSalt and cold tolerance
GS2 Chloroplastic glutamine synthetase Rice Increased salinity resistance and chilling tolerance
IMT1 Myo-inositol o-methyltransferase (D-ononitol synthesis) Tobacco Better CO2 fixation under salinity stress. Better recovery after drought stress.
LWR1, LWR2Solute accumulation (proline)ArabidopsisGrowth, osmotic adjustment, water status
M6PRMannose-6-phosphate reductaseArabidopsisMannitol accumulation under salt stress leading tosalt tolerance
M6PRMannose-6-phosphate reductaseArabidopsisMannitol accumulation and salt tolerance due to chloroplast protection
mt1D Mannitol-1-phosphate dehydrogenase (mannitol synthesis) Arabidopsis Increased germination under salinity stress
mt1D Mannitol-1-phosphate dehydrogenase (mannitol synthesis) PetuniaChilling tolerance
mt1D Mannitol-1-phosphate dehydrogenase (mannitol synthesis) Tobacco Increased plant height and fresh weight under salinity stress
mt1D Mannitol-1-phosphate dehydrogenase (mannitol synthesis) Tobacco No contribution to sustained growth under salinityand drought stress.
mt1D Mannitol-1-phosphate dehydrogenase (mannitol synthesis) WheatDrought and salinity tolerance of calli and plants
mt1D & GutDMannitol-1-phosphate dehydrogenase & glucitol-6-phosphate dehydrogenaseloblolly pineHigh salt tolerance due to mannitol and glucitol accumulation
mtlDMannitol-1-phosphate dehydrogenase (mannitol synthesis)Populus tomentosaSalinity tolerance
Osm1 …Osm4 Osmotin protein accumulation Tobacco Drought and salt tolerance in plant water status andproline accumulation
Osm1 ...Osm4 Osmotin protein accumulation StrawberryProline accumulation & salt tolerance
Osmyb4Cold induced transcription factorArabidopsisAccumulation of compatible solutes
Osmyb4Specifically cold inducibleTobaccoFreezing and Chilling tolerance
Osmyb4Cold induced transcription factorTomatoDrought but not cold resistance
OsP5CS2Highly homologous to P5CSRiceCold and salinity tolerance
otsA Trehalose-6-phosphate synthase (trehalose synthesis)Tobacco Increased leaf dry weight and photosynthetic activityunder drought. Increased carbohydrate accumulation.
otsB Trehalose-6-phosphate synthase (trehalose synthesis)Tobacco Increased leaf dry weight and photosynthetic activityunder drought. Increased carbohydrate accumulation.
P5CRPyrroline carboxylate reductase (proline accumulation)SoybeanAntioxidants activity under stress
P5CRPyrroline carboxylate reductase (proline accumulation)SoybeanAmino acid accumulation
P5CS Pyrroline carboxylate synthase (proline synthesis) (tomato) CitrusOsmotic adjustment and drought resistance
P5CSPyrroline carboxylate synthase (proline synthesis)PetuniaDrought resistance and high proline
P5CSPyrroline carboxylate synthase (proline synthesis)PotatoSalinity tolerance
P5CSPyrroline carboxylate synthase (proline synthesis)Rice Increased biomass production under drought and salinity stress
P5CSPyrroline carboxylate synthase (proline synthesis)Rice Reduced oxidative stress under osmotic stress
P5CSPyrroline carboxylate synthase (proline synthesis)Rice Resistance to water and sainity stress
P5CSPyrroline carboxylate synthase (proline synthesis)Soybean Resistance to osmotic stress and heat
P5CSPyrroline carboxylate synthase (proline synthesis) (tomato)SoybeanDrought resistance, high RWC, high proline
P5CSPyrroline carboxylate synthase (proline synthesis) (tomato) SugarcaneDrought resistance via antioxidant role of proline
P5CSPyrroline carboxylate synthase (proline synthesis)TobaccoIncreased biomass production and enhance flower development under salinity stress
P5CSPyrroline carboxylate synthase (proline synthesis)TobaccoFreezing tolerance
P5CSPyrroline carboxylate synthase (proline synthesis)WheatDrought resistance due to antioxidative action
P5CSPyrroline carboxylate synthase (proline synthesis) (tomato) YeastReduced growth under none-stress and some promoted growth under mild stress
pdc1 Pyruvate decarboxylase overexpressionRice Increased submergence tolerance
pdc1; pdc2Pyruvate decarboxylase overexpressionArabidopsisHypoxic stress survival
PPOPolyphenol oxidases suppressionTomatoDrought resistance
SAMDCS-adenosylmethioninedecarboxylase (polyamine synthesis)RiceBetter seedling growth under a 2 day NaCl stress
SAMDCS-adenosylmethioninedecarboxylase (polyamine synthesis)Tobaccodrought, salinity, Verticillium and Fusarium wiltsresistance
SMTselenocysteine methyltransferaseArabidopsis, Indian MustardSelenium hyperaccumulation tolerance
SPESpermidine synthaseArabidopsisChilling, freezing, salinity, drought hyperosmosis
spe1-1; spe2-1Spermidine non-accumulatingArabidopsisDecreased salt tolerance
SST/FFTFructan accumulationPotatoReduced proline accumulation at low water status
TaCRTCa2+-binding proteinTobaccoBetter water status, WUE and membrane stability
TPP1Trehalose synthesisRiceSalt and cold tolerance
TPS; TPPTrehalose synthesisArabidopsisDrought, freezing, salt and heat tolerance
TPS1Trehalose synthesisTomatoDrought, salt and oxidative stress tolerance
TPS1Trehalose synthesisPotatoDelayed wilting under drought
TPS1 & TPS2Trehalose synthesisTobaccoMaintenance of water status under drought stress
TPSPTrehalose synthesisRiceDrought, salt and cold tolerance expressed by chlorophyll fluorescence
WCOR15Cold induced geneTobaccoIncreased freezing tolerance
Table 3.

Some Examples of the Osmotic Regulating Genes Downstream in Abiotic Resistance

Components Metabolic Functions Gene/Proteins
ROS scavenging Increase in ROS scavenging enzymes GP, PHGPX
Chaperones Heat-/cold-/salt-shock proteins; protein folding
Hsp,Csp,Ssp,DnaJ
Fructan Osmoprotection SacB
Trehalose Osmoprotection
Tps;Tpp,trehalase
Glycine betaine Protein protection and carbon sink codA
Proline Substrate for mitochondrial respiration; redox control P5CS/P5CR
Ectoine Osmoprotectant EctA,BC
K+-transporters High affinity K+ uptake Hkt1,Hak1
K+-channels Low affinity or dual affinity K+ uptakeAkt1, Akt
H2O channel proteins Membrane cycling control TIP
  100 in total

Review 1.  Life with 25,000 genes.

Authors:  R S Poethig
Journal:  Genome Res       Date:  2001-03       Impact factor: 9.043

Review 2.  Looking beyond the details: a rise in system-oriented approaches in genetics and molecular biology.

Authors:  Hiroaki Kitano
Journal:  Curr Genet       Date:  2002-04-04       Impact factor: 3.886

Review 3.  Hormone signalling from a developmental context.

Authors:  Brenda Chow; Peter McCourt
Journal:  J Exp Bot       Date:  2003-12-12       Impact factor: 6.992

Review 4.  Light signals, phytochromes and cross-talk with other environmental cues.

Authors:  Keara A Franklin; Garry C Whitelam
Journal:  J Exp Bot       Date:  2003-12-12       Impact factor: 6.992

5.  Predicting gene expression from sequence.

Authors:  Michael A Beer; Saeed Tavazoie
Journal:  Cell       Date:  2004-04-16       Impact factor: 41.582

Review 6.  Charting gene regulatory networks: strategies, challenges and perspectives.

Authors:  Gong-Hong Wei; De-Pei Liu; Chih-Chuan Liang
Journal:  Biochem J       Date:  2004-07-01       Impact factor: 3.857

7.  Unravelling phenotypic plasticity -- why should we bother?

Authors:  Anthony D Bradshaw
Journal:  New Phytol       Date:  2006       Impact factor: 10.151

Review 8.  Metabolomics for phytomedicine research and drug development.

Authors:  Lie-Fen Shyur; Ning-Sun Yang
Journal:  Curr Opin Chem Biol       Date:  2008-02-21       Impact factor: 8.822

9.  Abiotic stress tolerance: from gene discovery in model organisms to crop improvement.

Authors:  Ray Bressan; Hans Bohnert; Jian-Kang Zhu
Journal:  Mol Plant       Date:  2009-01       Impact factor: 13.164

10.  Identification of drought tolerance determinants by genetic analysis of root response to drought stress and abscisic Acid.

Authors:  Liming Xiong; Rui-Gang Wang; Guohong Mao; Jessica M Koczan
Journal:  Plant Physiol       Date:  2006-09-08       Impact factor: 8.340

View more
  13 in total

1.  Characterization of Arabidopsis thaliana GCN2 kinase roles in seed germination and plant development.

Authors:  Xiaoyu Liu; Azim Merchant; Kristin S Rockett; Maggie McCormack; Karolina M Pajerowska-Mukhtar
Journal:  Plant Signal Behav       Date:  2015

2.  Recent Progress in Development of Tnt1 Functional Genomics Platform for Medicago truncatula and Lotus japonicus in Bulgaria.

Authors:  Miglena Revalska; Valya Vassileva; Sofie Goormachtig; Tom Van Hautegem; Pascal Ratet; Anelia Iantcheva
Journal:  Curr Genomics       Date:  2011-04       Impact factor: 2.236

3.  Semi-quantitative analysis of transcript accumulation in response to drought stress by Lepidium latifolium seedlings.

Authors:  Sanjay Mohan Gupta; Sadhana Singh; Pankaj Pandey; Atul Grover; Zakwan Ahmed
Journal:  Plant Signal Behav       Date:  2013-06-24

4.  Expression profiles of 12 late embryogenesis abundant protein genes from Tamarix hispida in response to abiotic stress.

Authors:  Caiqiu Gao; Yali Liu; Chao Wang; Kaimin Zhang; Yucheng Wang
Journal:  ScientificWorldJournal       Date:  2014-07-10

5.  Correlation between differential drought tolerability of two contrasting drought-responsive chickpea cultivars and differential expression of a subset of CaNAC genes under normal and dehydration conditions.

Authors:  Kien Huu Nguyen; Chien Van Ha; Yasuko Watanabe; Uyen Thi Tran; Maryam Nasr Esfahani; Dong Van Nguyen; Lam-Son Phan Tran
Journal:  Front Plant Sci       Date:  2015-06-19       Impact factor: 5.753

Review 6.  Transcription Factors and Their Roles in Signal Transduction in Plants under Abiotic Stresses.

Authors:  Xuan Lan Thi Hoang; Du Ngoc Hai Nhi; Nguyen Binh Anh Thu; Nguyen Phuong Thao; Lam-Son Phan Tran
Journal:  Curr Genomics       Date:  2017-12       Impact factor: 2.236

7.  Segregation of Hydroxycinnamic Acid Esters Mediating Sweetpotato Weevil Resistance in Storage Roots of Sweetpotato.

Authors:  Milton O Anyanga; Benard Yada; G C Yencho; Gorrettie N Ssemakula; Agnes Alajo; Dudley I Farman; Robert O M Mwanga; Philip C Stevenson
Journal:  Front Plant Sci       Date:  2017-06-13       Impact factor: 5.753

8.  Comparative analysis of latex transcriptome reveals putative molecular mechanisms underlying super productivity of Hevea brasiliensis.

Authors:  Chaorong Tang; Xiaohu Xiao; Heping Li; Yujie Fan; Jianghua Yang; Jiyan Qi; Huibo Li
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-09-16       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Evaluation of drought tolerance of the Vietnamese soybean cultivars provides potential resources for soybean production and genetic engineering.

Authors:  Nguyen Binh Anh Thu; Quang Thien Nguyen; Xuan Lan Thi Hoang; Nguyen Phuong Thao; Lam-Son Phan Tran
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2014-04-07       Impact factor: 3.411

10.  Genome-Wide Identification and Functional Classification of Tomato (Solanum lycopersicum) Aldehyde Dehydrogenase (ALDH) Gene Superfamily.

Authors:  Jose C Jimenez-Lopez; Francisco J Lopez-Valverde; Paula Robles-Bolivar; Elena Lima-Cabello; Emma W Gachomo; Simeon O Kotchoni
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-10-18       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.