Literature DB >> 19949322

Comparison of the effects of 2,5-dimethoxy-4-iodoamphetamine and D-amphetamine on the ability of rats to discriminate the durations and intensities of light stimuli.

C L Hampson1, S Body, F S den Boon, T H C Cheung, G Bezzina, R W Langley, K C F Fone, C M Bradshaw, E Szabadi.   

Abstract

Rats' ability to discriminate durations is disrupted by the monoamine-releasing agent D-amphetamine and the 5-HT2 receptor agonist 2,5-dimethoxy-4-iodoamphetamine (DOI). It is unknown whether this effect is specific for temporal discrimination or reflects general disruption of stimulus control. This experiment addressed this question by comparing the effects of D-amphetamine and DOI on temporal discrimination and discrimination along a nontemporal dimension, light intensity. Twelve rats responded on a schedule in which a light (intensity 22 cd/m) was presented for t seconds (2.5-47.5 s), after which levers A and B were presented. Responses on A were reinforced when t was less than 25 s, and responses on B were reinforced when t was greater than 25 s. Twelve rats responded on a similar schedule in which a light of intensity i (3.6-128.5 cd/m) was presented for 25 s. Responses on A were reinforced when i was less than 22 cd/m, and responses on B were reinforced when i was greater than 22 cd/m. Logistic functions were fitted and psychophysical parameters estimated [T50, I50 (central tendency of temporal or light-intensity discrimination); Weber fraction (relative discriminative precision)]. D-Amphetamine (0.2-0.8 mg/kg) increased the Weber fraction for temporal and light-intensity discrimination; DOI (0.625-0.25 mg/kg) increased it for temporal discrimination only. Both drugs increased T50; neither altered I50. D-Amphetamine and DOI have similar effects on temporal discrimination but different effects on light-intensity discrimination. The increase in T50 may reflect the impairment of sustained attention during prolonged stimulus presentation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 19949322     DOI: 10.1097/FBP.0b013e328334707a

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Behav Pharmacol        ISSN: 0955-8810            Impact factor:   2.293


  11 in total

1.  The pharmacological sensitivity of a touchscreen-based visual discrimination task in the rat using simple and perceptually challenging stimuli.

Authors:  J C Talpos; A C Fletcher; C Circelli; M D Tricklebank; S L Dix
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  2011-11-26       Impact factor: 4.530

Review 2.  Timing as a window on cognition in schizophrenia.

Authors:  Ryan D Ward; Christoph Kellendonk; Eric R Kandel; Peter D Balsam
Journal:  Neuropharmacology       Date:  2011-04-21       Impact factor: 5.250

3.  D-amphetamine, nicotine, and haloperidol produce similar disruptions in spatial and nonspatial temporal discrimination procedures.

Authors:  Erin A McClure; Kathryn A Saulsgiver; Clive D L Wynne
Journal:  Behav Pharmacol       Date:  2011-04       Impact factor: 2.293

Review 4.  Animal models of serotonergic psychedelics.

Authors:  James B Hanks; Javier González-Maeso
Journal:  ACS Chem Neurosci       Date:  2012-09-24       Impact factor: 4.418

Review 5.  Recent advances in the neuropsychopharmacology of serotonergic hallucinogens.

Authors:  Adam L Halberstadt
Journal:  Behav Brain Res       Date:  2014-07-15       Impact factor: 3.332

6.  Effect of 5-HT2A and 5-HT2C receptors on temporal discrimination by mice.

Authors:  Adam L Halberstadt; Ivan S Sindhunata; Kees Scheffers; Aaron D Flynn; Richard F Sharp; Mark A Geyer; Jared W Young
Journal:  Neuropharmacology       Date:  2016-03-25       Impact factor: 5.250

Review 7.  Psychedelics.

Authors:  David E Nichols
Journal:  Pharmacol Rev       Date:  2016-04       Impact factor: 25.468

Review 8.  Serotonergic hallucinogens as translational models relevant to schizophrenia.

Authors:  Adam L Halberstadt; Mark A Geyer
Journal:  Int J Neuropsychopharmacol       Date:  2013-08-13       Impact factor: 5.176

9.  Dopamine modulates reward expectancy during performance of a slot machine task in rats: evidence for a 'near-miss' effect.

Authors:  Catharine A Winstanley; Paul J Cocker; Robert D Rogers
Journal:  Neuropsychopharmacology       Date:  2011-01-05       Impact factor: 7.853

Review 10.  Linking ADHD to the Neural Circuitry of Attention.

Authors:  Adrienne Mueller; David S Hong; Steven Shepard; Tirin Moore
Journal:  Trends Cogn Sci       Date:  2017-05-05       Impact factor: 20.229

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.