Literature DB >> 19948662

Growth of Belgian and Norwegian children compared to the WHO growth standards: prevalence below -2 and above +2 SD and the effect of breastfeeding.

P B Júlíusson1, M Roelants, K Hoppenbrouwers, R Hauspie, R Bjerknes.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: New national growth references have been published in Belgium and Norway. The WHO recommends universal use of their 2006 Child Growth Standards based on data from breastfed children.
OBJECTIVE: To compare the growth of Belgian and Norwegian children with the WHO standards. PARTICIPANTS: 6985 children 0-5 years of age from Belgium and Norway.
DESIGN: Proportion of children below -2 SD and above +2 SD of the WHO standards was calculated for length/height, weight, body mass index and head circumference. Average SD scores of exclusively breastfed children of non-smoking mothers were compared with national reference data and with the WHO standards.
RESULTS: Generally, the number of Belgian and Norwegian children below -2 SD lines of the WHO standards was lower and above +2 SD higher than expected. The largest differences were for head circumference (0.97% Belgian and 0.18% Norwegian children below -2 SD, 6.55% Belgian and 6.40% Norwegian children above +2 SD) and the smallest for length/height (1.25% Belgian and 1.43% Norwegian children below -2 SD, 3.47% Belgian and 2.81% Norwegian children above +2 SD). The growth pattern of breastfed children of non-smoking mothers was in both countries more alike the local national growth references than the WHO standards.
CONCLUSIONS: There are significant deviations in the proportion of children outside normal limits (±2 SD) of the WHO standards. This was true for all children, including those who were exclusively breastfed. Hence, adoption of the WHO growth charts could have consequences for clinical decision-making. These findings advocate the use of national references in Belgium and Norway, also for breastfed children.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19948662     DOI: 10.1136/adc.2009.166157

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Arch Dis Child        ISSN: 0003-9888            Impact factor:   3.791


  32 in total

1.  The use of local reference growth charts for clinical use or a universal standard: a balanced appraisal.

Authors:  S Milani; J M H Buckler; C J H Kelnar; L Benso; G Gilli; I Nicoletti; G Faglia; G Radetti; G Bona; Y Schonbeck; S Van Buuren; M Hermanussen; G Grugni; N Marazzi; P B Júlíusson; M Roelants; K Hoppenbrouwers; R Hauspie; R Bjerknes; H Lejarraga; A Sartorio
Journal:  J Endocrinol Invest       Date:  2012-02       Impact factor: 4.256

2.  Maternal hormonal contraceptive use and offspring overweight or obesity.

Authors:  E T Jensen; J L Daniels; T Stürmer; W R Robinson; C J Williams; D Moster; P B Juliusson; K Vejrup; P Magnus; M P Longnecker
Journal:  Int J Obes (Lond)       Date:  2014-07-02       Impact factor: 5.095

3.  Prevalence of obesity in Italian adolescents: does the use of different growth charts make the difference?

Authors:  Luca De Carli; Elena Spada; Silvano Milani; Gian Pasquale Ganzit; Lucia Ghizzoni; Melissa Raia; Alessandra Coscia; Enrico Bertino; Simona Bo
Journal:  World J Pediatr       Date:  2018-03-05       Impact factor: 2.764

4.  The development of growth references and growth charts.

Authors:  T J Cole
Journal:  Ann Hum Biol       Date:  2012-07-11       Impact factor: 1.533

5.  Polish 2012 growth references for preschool children.

Authors:  Zbigniew Kułaga; Aneta Grajda; Beata Gurzkowska; Magdalena Góźdź; Małgorzata Wojtyło; Anna Swiąder; Agnieszka Różdżyńska-Świątkowska; Mieczysław Litwin
Journal:  Eur J Pediatr       Date:  2013-02-01       Impact factor: 3.183

6.  Monitoring head size and growth using the new UK-WHO growth standard.

Authors:  Charlotte M Wright; Hazel M Inskip; Keith Godfrey; Anthony F Williams; Ken K Ong
Journal:  Arch Dis Child       Date:  2011-02-01       Impact factor: 3.791

7.  Automated identification of implausible values in growth data from pediatric electronic health records.

Authors:  Carrie Daymont; Michelle E Ross; A Russell Localio; Alexander G Fiks; Richard C Wasserman; Robert W Grundmeier
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  2017-11-01       Impact factor: 4.497

8.  Higher maternal education is associated with favourable growth of young children in different countries.

Authors:  Rajalakshmi Lakshman; Jing Zhang; Jianduan Zhang; Felix S Koch; Claude Marcus; Johnny Ludvigsson; Ken K Ong; Tanja Sobko
Journal:  J Epidemiol Community Health       Date:  2013-02-28       Impact factor: 3.710

9.  Use of national and international growth charts for studying height in European children: development of up-to-date European height-for-age charts.

Authors:  Marjolein Bonthuis; Karlijn J van Stralen; Enrico Verrina; Alberto Edefonti; Elena A Molchanova; Anita C S Hokken-Koelega; Franz Schaefer; Kitty J Jager
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-08-15       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  WHO Child Growth Standards in context: The Baby-bod Project - Observational study in Tasmania.

Authors:  Sisitha Jayasinghe; Manoja P Herath; Jeffrey M Beckett; Kiran D K Ahuja; Nuala M Byrne; Andrew P Hills
Journal:  BMJ Paediatr Open       Date:  2021-06-16
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.