Literature DB >> 19948534

Assisted reproductive technologies do not enhance the variability of DNA methylation imprints in human.

Sascha Tierling1, Nicole Y Souren, Jasmin Gries, Christina Loporto, Marco Groth, Pavlo Lutsik, Heidemarie Neitzel, Isabelle Utz-Billing, Gabriele Gillessen-Kaesbach, Heribert Kentenich, Georg Griesinger, Karl Sperling, Eberhard Schwinger, Jörn Walter.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND Assisted reproductive technologies (ART) such as in vitro fertilisation (IVF) and intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) are believed to destabilise genomic imprints. An increased frequency of Beckwith-Wiedemann syndrome in children born after ART has been reported. Other, mostly epidemiological, studies argue against this finding. OBJECTIVE To examine the effect of ART on the stability of DNA methylation imprints, DNA was extracted from maternal peripheral blood (MPB), umbilical cord blood (UCB) and amnion/chorion tissue (ACT) of 185 phenotypically normal children (77 ICSI, 35 IVF, and 73 spontaneous conceptions). Using bisulfite based technologies 10 differentially methylated regions (DMRs) were analysed, including KvDMR1, H19, SNRPN, MEST, GRB10, DLK1/MEG3 IG-DMR, GNAS NESP55, GNAS NESPas, GNAS XL-alpha-s and GNAS Exon1A. RESULTS Methylation indices (MI) do not reveal any significant differences at nine DMRs among the conception groups in neither MPB, UCB nor in ACT. The only slightly variable DMR was that of MEST. Here the mean MI was higher in UCB and MPB of IVF cases (mean MI+/-SD: 0.41+/-0.03 (UCB) and 0.40+/-0.03 (MPB)) compared to the ICSI (0.38+/-0.03, p=0.003 (UCB); 0.37+/-0.04, p=0.0007 (MPB)) or spontaneous cases (0.38+/-0.03, p=0.003 (UCB); 0.38+/-0.04, p=0.02 (MPB)). Weak but suggestive correlations between DMRs were, however, found between MPB, UCB and ACT. CONCLUSION This study supports the notion that children conceived by ART do not show a higher degree of imprint variability and hence do not have an a priori higher risk for imprinting disorders.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19948534     DOI: 10.1136/jmg.2009.073189

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Med Genet        ISSN: 0022-2593            Impact factor:   6.318


  30 in total

1.  Outlier DNA methylation levels as an indicator of environmental exposure and risk of undesirable birth outcome.

Authors:  Jayashri Ghosh; Monica Mainigi; Christos Coutifaris; Carmen Sapienza
Journal:  Hum Mol Genet       Date:  2015-11-12       Impact factor: 6.150

Review 2.  A Molecular Perspective on Procedures and Outcomes with Assisted Reproductive Technologies.

Authors:  Monica A Mainigi; Carmen Sapienza; Samantha Butts; Christos Coutifaris
Journal:  Cold Spring Harb Perspect Med       Date:  2016-04-01       Impact factor: 6.915

Review 3.  The impact of assisted reproductive technologies on genomic imprinting and imprinting disorders.

Authors:  Asli Uyar; Emre Seli
Journal:  Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2014-06       Impact factor: 1.927

Review 4.  Are there subtle genome-wide epigenetic alterations in normal offspring conceived by assisted reproductive technologies?

Authors:  April Batcheller; Eden Cardozo; Marcy Maguire; Alan H DeCherney; James H Segars
Journal:  Fertil Steril       Date:  2011-10-26       Impact factor: 7.329

5.  Study of DNA methylation patterns of imprinted genes in children born after assisted reproductive technologies reveals no imprinting errors: A pilot study.

Authors:  Hai-Yan Zheng; Xiao-Yun Shi; LE-LE Wang; Ya-Qin Wu; Shi-Ling Chen; Lin Zhang
Journal:  Exp Ther Med       Date:  2011-04-29       Impact factor: 2.447

Review 6.  Epigenetic changes and assisted reproductive technologies.

Authors:  Sneha Mani; Jayashri Ghosh; Christos Coutifaris; Carmen Sapienza; Monica Mainigi
Journal:  Epigenetics       Date:  2019-07-25       Impact factor: 4.528

Review 7.  Imprinting disorders and assisted reproductive technology.

Authors:  Lawrence N Odom; James Segars
Journal:  Curr Opin Endocrinol Diabetes Obes       Date:  2010-12       Impact factor: 3.243

8.  Variable imprinting of the MEST gene in human preimplantation embryos.

Authors:  John D Huntriss; Karen E Hemmings; Matthew Hinkins; Anthony J Rutherford; Roger G Sturmey; Kay Elder; Helen M Picton
Journal:  Eur J Hum Genet       Date:  2012-07-04       Impact factor: 4.246

9.  In vitro fertilization and embryo culture strongly impact the placental transcriptome in the mouse model.

Authors:  Patricia Fauque; Françoise Mondon; Franck Letourneur; Marie-Anne Ripoche; Laurent Journot; Sandrine Barbaux; Luisa Dandolo; Catherine Patrat; Jean-Philippe Wolf; Pierre Jouannet; Hélène Jammes; Daniel Vaiman
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2010-02-15       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Aberrant methylation of the TDMR of the GTF2A1L promoter does not affect fertilisation rates via TESE in patients with hypospermatogenesis.

Authors:  Kazuhiro Sugimoto; Eitetsu Koh; Masashi Iijima; Masaki Taya; Yuji Maeda; Mikio Namiki
Journal:  Asian J Androl       Date:  2013-06-17       Impact factor: 3.285

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.