Literature DB >> 22977570

Study of DNA methylation patterns of imprinted genes in children born after assisted reproductive technologies reveals no imprinting errors: A pilot study.

Hai-Yan Zheng1, Xiao-Yun Shi, LE-LE Wang, Ya-Qin Wu, Shi-Ling Chen, Lin Zhang.   

Abstract

Assisted reproductive technology (ART) including in vitro fertilization (IVF) and intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) have been shown to be associated with abnormal genomic imprinting, thus increasing the incidence of imprinting disorders such as Beckwith-Wiedemann syndrome (BWS) and Angelman syndrome (AS) in ART-conceived children. Furthermore, a recent study described abnormal DNA methylation in clinically normal children conceived by ART. However, data from different studies are conflicting or inconclusive. This study examined DNA methylation patterns of multiple imprinted genes in children born after ART to primarily evaluate the impact of ART on genomic imprinting. A total of 101 newborns conceived by ART (40 ICSI and 61 IVF) and 60 naturally conceived newborns were involved in our study. After obtaining the approval of the Institutional Ethics Committee, umbilical cord blood was collected from each infant. Genomic DNA was isolated from each blood sample and treated using sodium bisulfite. Subsequently, using methylation-specific PCR (MS-PCR), we analyzed six differentially methylated regions (DMRs) including KvDMR1, SNRPN, MEST, MEG3, TNDM and XIST. Meanwhile, information regarding twin pregnancies, gestational age, and birth weight of the neonates was documented. None of the cases presented with phenotypic abnormalities. Children conceived by ART were more likely to have low birth weight and to be born before term, compared with children conceived spontaneously. However, 7 months to 3 years of clinical follow-up showed that none of the children had clinical symptoms of any imprinting diseases. Furthermore, the MS-PCR results showed that all 161 children had normal DNA methylation patterns at six DMRs despite the different mode of conception. Our data did not indicate a higher risk of DNA-methylation defects in children born after ART. However, further studies using quantitative methods are needed to confirm these results.

Entities:  

Year:  2011        PMID: 22977570      PMCID: PMC3440701          DOI: 10.3892/etm.2011.261

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Exp Ther Med        ISSN: 1792-0981            Impact factor:   2.447


  40 in total

1.  Imprinting and the epigenetic asymmetry between parental genomes.

Authors:  A C Ferguson-Smith; M A Surani
Journal:  Science       Date:  2001-08-10       Impact factor: 47.728

Review 2.  Advanced maternal age and adverse perinatal outcome: a review of the evidence.

Authors:  Mary Carolan; Dorota Frankowska
Journal:  Midwifery       Date:  2010-10-02       Impact factor: 2.372

3.  Epigenetic transgenerational actions of endocrine disruptors and male fertility.

Authors:  Matthew D Anway; Andrea S Cupp; Mehmet Uzumcu; Michael K Skinner
Journal:  Science       Date:  2005-06-03       Impact factor: 47.728

Review 4.  Assisted reproduction technology and defects of genomic imprinting.

Authors:  Cathy Allen; William Reardon
Journal:  BJOG       Date:  2005-12       Impact factor: 6.531

5.  IVF results in de novo DNA methylation and histone methylation at an Igf2-H19 imprinting epigenetic switch.

Authors:  Tao Li; Thanh H Vu; Gary A Ulaner; Eva Littman; Jian-Qun Ling; Hui-Ling Chen; Ji-Fan Hu; Barry Behr; Linda Giudice; Andrew R Hoffman
Journal:  Mol Hum Reprod       Date:  2005-10-11       Impact factor: 4.025

6.  The epigenetic imprinting defect of patients with Beckwith-Wiedemann syndrome born after assisted reproductive technology is not restricted to the 11p15 region.

Authors:  S Rossignol; V Steunou; C Chalas; A Kerjean; M Rigolet; E Viegas-Pequignot; P Jouannet; Y Le Bouc; C Gicquel
Journal:  J Med Genet       Date:  2006-07-06       Impact factor: 6.318

7.  Mini-swim-up: a new technique of sperm preparation for intracytoplasmic sperm injection.

Authors:  S Al Hasani; W Küpker; A A Baschat; R Sturm; O Bauer; C Diedrich; K Diedrich
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  1995-08       Impact factor: 3.412

8.  A new assay for the analysis of X-chromosome inactivation based on methylation-specific PCR.

Authors:  T Kubota; S Nonoyama; H Tonoki; M Masuno; K Imaizumi; M Kojima; K Wakui; M Shimadzu; Y Fukushima
Journal:  Hum Genet       Date:  1999-01       Impact factor: 4.132

9.  A survey of assisted reproductive technology births and imprinting disorders.

Authors:  Sarah Bowdin; Cathy Allen; Gail Kirby; Louise Brueton; Masoud Afnan; Christopher Barratt; Jackson Kirkman-Brown; Robert Harrison; Eamonn R Maher; William Reardon
Journal:  Hum Reprod       Date:  2007-10-05       Impact factor: 6.918

10.  Assisted Reproductive Technology affects developmental kinetics, H19 Imprinting Control Region methylation and H19 gene expression in individual mouse embryos.

Authors:  Patricia Fauque; Pierre Jouannet; Corinne Lesaffre; Marie-Anne Ripoche; Luisa Dandolo; Daniel Vaiman; Hélène Jammes
Journal:  BMC Dev Biol       Date:  2007-10-18       Impact factor: 1.978

View more
  8 in total

1.  Outlier DNA methylation levels as an indicator of environmental exposure and risk of undesirable birth outcome.

Authors:  Jayashri Ghosh; Monica Mainigi; Christos Coutifaris; Carmen Sapienza
Journal:  Hum Mol Genet       Date:  2015-11-12       Impact factor: 6.150

Review 2.  Epigenetic changes and assisted reproductive technologies.

Authors:  Sneha Mani; Jayashri Ghosh; Christos Coutifaris; Carmen Sapienza; Monica Mainigi
Journal:  Epigenetics       Date:  2019-07-25       Impact factor: 4.528

3.  DNA methylation in spermatogenesis and male infertility.

Authors:  Xiangrong Cui; Xuan Jing; Xueqing Wu; Meiqin Yan; Qiang Li; Yan Shen; Zhenqiang Wang
Journal:  Exp Ther Med       Date:  2016-08-04       Impact factor: 2.447

Review 4.  What are the risks of the assisted reproductive technologies (ART) and how can they be minimized?

Authors:  Robert W Rebar
Journal:  Reprod Med Biol       Date:  2013-06-11

5.  Similar DNA methylation levels in specific imprinting control regions in children conceived with and without assisted reproductive technology: a cross-sectional study.

Authors:  Susan E Puumala; Heather H Nelson; Julie A Ross; Ruby H N Nguyen; Mark A Damario; Logan G Spector
Journal:  BMC Pediatr       Date:  2012-03-20       Impact factor: 2.125

6.  DNA methylation differences between in vitro- and in vivo-conceived children are associated with ART procedures rather than infertility.

Authors:  Sisi Song; Jayashri Ghosh; Monica Mainigi; Nahid Turan; Rachel Weinerman; May Truongcao; Christos Coutifaris; Carmen Sapienza
Journal:  Clin Epigenetics       Date:  2015-04-08       Impact factor: 6.551

7.  ART manipulation after controlled ovarian stimulation may not increase the risk of abnormal expression and DNA methylation at some CpG sites of H19,IGF2 and SNRPN in foetuses: a pilot study.

Authors:  Menglu Ji; Xingling Wang; Wenbin Wu; Yichun Guan; Jing Liu; Jingyan Wang; Wenxia Liu; Chunyan Shen
Journal:  Reprod Biol Endocrinol       Date:  2018-07-05       Impact factor: 5.211

Review 8.  Genetic counseling prior to assisted reproductive technology.

Authors:  Yukiko Katagiri; Yuko Tamaki
Journal:  Reprod Med Biol       Date:  2020-12-31
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.