Literature DB >> 19948517

Childhood tonsillectomy: who is referred and what treatment choices are made? Baseline findings from the North of England and Scotland Study of Tonsillectomy and Adenotonsillectomy in Children (NESSTAC).

Catherine Lock1, Janet Wilson, Nick Steen, Martin Eccles, Katie Brittain, Sean Carrie, Ray Clarke, Haytham Kubba, Chris Raine, Andrew Zarod, John Bond.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Tonsillectomies are frequently performed, yet variations exist in tonsillectomy rates. Clinicians use guidelines, but complex psychosocial influences on childhood tonsillectomy include anecdotal evidence of parental enthusiasm. Studies indicate that undergoing preferred treatment improves outcome. Despite the enthusiasm with which tonsillectomy is offered and sought, there is little evidence of efficacy. This resulted in a randomised controlled trial to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of (adeno)tonsillectomy in children with recurrent sore throats.
OBJECTIVE: To compare characteristics of children entering the randomised trial with those recruited to a parallel, non-randomised study, to establish trends in referral and patient preferences for treatment.
DESIGN: Baseline data from a randomised controlled trial with parallel non-randomised preference study, comparing surgical intervention with medical treatment in children aged 4-15 years with recurrent sore throat referred to five secondary care otolaryngology departments located in the north of England or west central Scotland.
RESULTS: Centres assessed 1546 children; 21% were not eligible for tonsillectomy. Among older children (8-15 years), girls were significantly more likely to be referred to secondary care. Of 1015 eligible children, 268 (28.2%) agreed to be randomised, while 461 (45.4%) agreed to the parallel, non-randomised preference study, with a strong preference for tonsillectomy. Participants reporting that progress at school had been impeded or with more experience of persistent sore throat were more likely to seek tonsillectomy. Referred boys were more likely than girls to opt for medical treatment. Socio-economic data showed no effect.
CONCLUSION: Preference for tonsillectomy reflects educational impact and recent experience, rather than age or socio-economic status.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19948517     DOI: 10.1136/adc.2009.165530

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Arch Dis Child        ISSN: 0003-9888            Impact factor:   3.791


  4 in total

Review 1.  Tonsillectomy Versus Watchful Waiting for Recurrent Throat Infection: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Anna Morad; Nila A Sathe; David O Francis; Melissa L McPheeters; Sivakumar Chinnadurai
Journal:  Pediatrics       Date:  2017-01-17       Impact factor: 7.124

2.  The NAtional randomised controlled Trial of Tonsillectomy IN Adults (NATTINA): a clinical and cost-effectiveness study: study protocol for a randomised control trial.

Authors:  Isabel Rubie; Catherine Haighton; James O'Hara; Nikki Rousseau; Nick Steen; Deborah D Stocken; Frank Sullivan; Luke Vale; Scott Wilkes; Janet Wilson
Journal:  Trials       Date:  2015-06-06       Impact factor: 2.279

3.  Effects of Tonsil size on Pulmonary Function test Results after Tonsillectomy in Children.

Authors:  Mitra Samareh Fekri; Aliasghar Arabi Mianroodi; Hossein Shakeri; Narges Khanjani
Journal:  Iran J Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2016-01

4.  Patient attitudes to tonsillectomy.

Authors:  Kishan Ubayasiri; Ravi Kothari; Lisha McClelland; Mriganka De
Journal:  Int J Family Med       Date:  2012-12-24
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.