Literature DB >> 19948515

How should paediatricians assess Gillick competence?

Vic Larcher1, Anna Hutchinson.   

Abstract

Competence is an essential legal requirement for valid consent to medical treatment. Children under 16 may be considered 'Gillick competent' to make treatment decisions, but may need to demonstrate this. Applied tests for competence are wide-ranging and context dependent. Competence is related to cognitive ability and experience and may be enhanced by education, encouragement etc.; there is a general duty for professionals to enhance the competence of children in their care. The need to assess a child's competence may occur when s/he wishes to make a controversial decision whose wisdom others dispute. Potential assessors should have the necessary practical skills and an understanding of the child in their social and medical context. Assessments should be developmentally appropriate, explore systemic influences, and consider the child's emotional state, cognitive development and ability to balance risks and benefits. The involvement of a psychologist or other independent third party should be considered in cases that raise serious concerns about competency, or that involve complex decisions or conflict between the various parties. In rare cases courts may be involved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19948515     DOI: 10.1136/adc.2008.148676

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Arch Dis Child        ISSN: 0003-9888            Impact factor:   3.791


  14 in total

1.  The Potential Value of the U.N. Convention on the Rights of the Child in Pediatric Bioethics Settings.

Authors:  Michael Da Silva; Cheryl D Lew; Laura Lundy; Kellie R Lang; Irene Melamed; Randi Zlotnik Shaul
Journal:  Perspect Biol Med       Date:  2016       Impact factor: 1.416

2.  Decision-making capacity of children and adolescents--suggestions for advancing the concept's implementation in pediatric healthcare.

Authors:  Katharina M Ruhe; Tenzin Wangmo; Domnita O Badarau; Bernice S Elger; Felix Niggli
Journal:  Eur J Pediatr       Date:  2014-11-27       Impact factor: 3.183

3.  Medical decision-making competence regarding puberty suppression: perceptions of transgender adolescents, their parents and clinicians.

Authors:  Lieke Josephina Jeanne Johanna Vrouenraets; Annelou L C de Vries; Marijn Arnoldussen; Sabine E Hannema; Ramón J L Lindauer; Martine C de Vries; Irma M Hein
Journal:  Eur Child Adolesc Psychiatry       Date:  2022-09-17       Impact factor: 5.349

4.  Participation of Children in Medical Decision-Making: Challenges and Potential Solutions.

Authors:  Vida Jeremic; Karine Sénécal; Pascal Borry; Davit Chokoshvili; Danya F Vears
Journal:  J Bioeth Inq       Date:  2016-09-21       Impact factor: 1.352

5.  Relational Capacity: Broadening the Notion of Decision-Making Capacity in Paediatric Healthcare.

Authors:  Katharina M Ruhe; Eva De Clercq; Tenzin Wangmo; Bernice S Elger
Journal:  J Bioeth Inq       Date:  2016-06-30       Impact factor: 1.352

6.  Clarifying assent in pediatric research.

Authors:  Noor A A Giesbertz; Annelien L Bredenoord; Johannes J M van Delden
Journal:  Eur J Hum Genet       Date:  2013-06-12       Impact factor: 4.246

7.  Why is it hard to make progress in assessing children's decision-making competence?

Authors:  Irma M Hein; Pieter W Troost; Alice Broersma; Martine C de Vries; Joost G Daams; Ramón J L Lindauer
Journal:  BMC Med Ethics       Date:  2015-01-10       Impact factor: 2.652

8.  Assessing children's competence to consent in research by a standardized tool: a validity study.

Authors:  Irma M Hein; Pieter W Troost; Robert Lindeboom; Martine C de Vries; C Michel Zwaan; Ramón J L Lindauer
Journal:  BMC Pediatr       Date:  2012-09-25       Impact factor: 2.125

9.  Key factors in children's competence to consent to clinical research.

Authors:  Irma M Hein; Pieter W Troost; Robert Lindeboom; Marc A Benninga; C Michel Zwaan; Johannes B van Goudoever; Ramón J L Lindauer
Journal:  BMC Med Ethics       Date:  2015-10-24       Impact factor: 2.652

10.  Identifying Ethical Issues in Mental Health Research with Minors Adolescents: Results of a Delphi Study.

Authors:  Elisabeta Ioana Hiriscau; Nicola Stingelin-Giles; Danuta Wasserman; Stella Reiter-Theil
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2016-05-11       Impact factor: 3.390

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.