Literature DB >> 19948510

Bilateral or unilateral cochlear implantation for deaf children: an observational study.

R E S Lovett1, P T Kitterick, C E Hewitt, A Q Summerfield.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Cochlear implantation in one ear (unilateral implantation) has been the standard treatment for severe-profound childhood deafness. We assessed whether cochlear implantation in both ears (bilateral implantation) is associated with better listening skills, higher health-related quality of life (health utility) and higher general quality of life (QOL) than unilateral implantation.
DESIGN: Cross-sectional observational study.
SETTING: University of York. PARTICIPANTS: Fifty severely-profoundly deaf and 56 normally-hearing children recruited via a charity, the UK National Health Service and schools.
INTERVENTIONS: Thirty of the deaf children had received bilateral cochlear implants; 20 had unilateral cochlear implants. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Performance measures of children's listening skills; parental-proxy valuations of the deaf children's health utility obtained with the Health Utilities Index Mark 3 and of their QOL obtained with a visual analogue scale.
RESULTS: On average, bilaterally-implanted children performed significantly better than unilaterally implanted children on tests of sound localisation and speech perception in noise. After conservative imputation of missing data and while controlling for confounds, bilateral implantation was associated with increases of 18.5% in accuracy of sound localisation (95% CI 5.9 to 31.1) and of 3.7 dB in speech perception in noise (95% CI 0.9 to 6.5). Bilaterally-implanted children did not perform as well as normally-hearing children, on average. Bilaterally- and unilaterally-implanted children did not differ significantly in parental ratings of health utility (difference in medians 0.05, p>0.05) or QOL (difference in medians 0.01, p>0.05).
CONCLUSIONS: Compared with unilateral cochlear implantation, bilateral implantation is associated with better listening skills in severely-profoundly deaf children.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19948510     DOI: 10.1136/adc.2009.160325

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Arch Dis Child        ISSN: 0003-9888            Impact factor:   3.791


  19 in total

1.  Acquisition of tense marking in English-speaking children with cochlear implants: a longitudinal study.

Authors:  Ling-Yu Guo; Linda J Spencer; J Bruce Tomblin
Journal:  J Deaf Stud Deaf Educ       Date:  2013-01-03

Review 2.  Quality of Life in Children with Hearing Impairment: Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

Authors:  Lauren Roland; Caroline Fischer; Kayla Tran; Tara Rachakonda; Dorina Kallogjeri; Judith E C Lieu
Journal:  Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2016-04-26       Impact factor: 3.497

3.  Are Young Children With Cochlear Implants Sensitive to the Statistics of Words in the Ambient Spoken Language?

Authors:  Ling-Yu Guo; Karla K McGregor; Linda J Spencer
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2015-06       Impact factor: 2.297

4.  Pitch Accuracy of Vocal Singing in Deaf Children With Bimodal Hearing and Bilateral Cochlear Implants.

Authors:  Li Xu; Jing Yang; Emily Hahn; Rosalie Uchanski; Lisa Davidson
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2021-12-17       Impact factor: 3.562

5.  Spatial hearing of normally hearing and cochlear implanted children.

Authors:  John Murphy; A Quentin Summerfield; Gerard M O'Donoghue; David R Moore
Journal:  Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2011-02-05       Impact factor: 1.675

Review 6.  Systematic review of the literature on the clinical effectiveness of the cochlear implant procedure in paediatric patients.

Authors:  F Forli; E Arslan; S Bellelli; S Burdo; P Mancini; A Martini; M Miccoli; N Quaranta; S Berrettini
Journal:  Acta Otorhinolaryngol Ital       Date:  2011-10       Impact factor: 2.124

7.  Personality Traits of Profoundly Hearing Impaired Adolescents with Cochlear Implants - A Comparison with Normal Hearing Peers.

Authors:  Merle Boerrigter; Anneke Vermeulen; Henri Marres; Margreet Langereis
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2018-02-20

Review 8.  Bilateral Cochlear Implantation: A Health Technology Assessment.

Authors: 
Journal:  Ont Health Technol Assess Ser       Date:  2018-10-24

9.  Bilateral versus unilateral cochlear implants in children: a study of spoken language outcomes.

Authors:  Julia Sarant; David Harris; Lisa Bennet; Sharyn Bant
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2014 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 3.570

Review 10.  An assessment of validity and responsiveness of generic measures of health-related quality of life in hearing impairment.

Authors:  Yaling Yang; Louise Longworth; John Brazier
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2013-05-26       Impact factor: 4.147

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.