BACKGROUND: Hospitalized smokers are a large and important but undertreated population. Although effective strategies have been developed to enhance smoking cessation, many hospitalized smokers still fail to benefit from these services. A study was conducted to examine the reach of services within a hospital tobacco treatment program and to identify predictors of referral and treatment. METHODS: Electronic medical records were downloaded for all 3,600 smokers admitted to a 475-bed academic medical center hospital in a one-year period. RESULTS: More than one in four of identified smokers were referred to the specialty service and nearly one in five received treatment. Logistic regression models found that Joint Commission core measure status (heart failure, myocardial infarction, and pneumonia) was the strongest predictor of referral, followed by a history of smoking for more than 10 years. Conversely, smokers admitted for emergency medical services were less likely to be referred compared with those admitted electively. Patients treated on surgical, obstetric, and psychiatric services were less likely to be referred for tobacco treatment than those treated on medical services. Of those referred, smokers with longer lengths of stay and those admitted through the emergency department were more likely to actually receive services. DISCUSSION: To capitalize on hospitalization as a "teachable moment," other subpopulations, such as psychiatric and obstetric patients, deserve attention. Tobacco treatment services must be fully integrated into hospital systems, configured to deliver care to all smokers, and reimbursed to ensure sustainability. This study's identification of underserved groups, determination of potential roadblocks to delivery of services, and suggestion of ways to disseminate treatment equitably to all smokers should prove helpful to policymakers.
BACKGROUND: Hospitalized smokers are a large and important but undertreated population. Although effective strategies have been developed to enhance smoking cessation, many hospitalized smokers still fail to benefit from these services. A study was conducted to examine the reach of services within a hospital tobacco treatment program and to identify predictors of referral and treatment. METHODS: Electronic medical records were downloaded for all 3,600 smokers admitted to a 475-bed academic medical center hospital in a one-year period. RESULTS: More than one in four of identified smokers were referred to the specialty service and nearly one in five received treatment. Logistic regression models found that Joint Commission core measure status (heart failure, myocardial infarction, and pneumonia) was the strongest predictor of referral, followed by a history of smoking for more than 10 years. Conversely, smokers admitted for emergency medical services were less likely to be referred compared with those admitted electively. Patients treated on surgical, obstetric, and psychiatric services were less likely to be referred for tobacco treatment than those treated on medical services. Of those referred, smokers with longer lengths of stay and those admitted through the emergency department were more likely to actually receive services. DISCUSSION: To capitalize on hospitalization as a "teachable moment," other subpopulations, such as psychiatric and obstetric patients, deserve attention. Tobacco treatment services must be fully integrated into hospital systems, configured to deliver care to all smokers, and reimbursed to ensure sustainability. This study's identification of underserved groups, determination of potential roadblocks to delivery of services, and suggestion of ways to disseminate treatment equitably to all smokers should prove helpful to policymakers.
Authors: Kate E Koplan; Susan Regan; Robert C Goldszer; Louise I Schneider; Nancy A Rigotti Journal: J Gen Intern Med Date: 2008-05-09 Impact factor: 5.128
Authors: Ali F Sonel; Chester B Good; Jyotsna Mulgund; Matthew T Roe; W Brian Gibler; Sidney C Smith; Mauricio G Cohen; Charles V Pollack; E Magnus Ohman; Eric D Peterson Journal: Circulation Date: 2005-03-15 Impact factor: 29.690
Authors: Babalola Faseru; Margaret Turner; Genevieve Casey; Christopher Ruder; Christie A Befort; Edward F Ellerbeck; Kimber P Richter Journal: J Hosp Med Date: 2010-11-24 Impact factor: 2.960
Authors: Babalola Faseru; Laura M Mussulman; Niaman Nazir; Edward F Ellerbeck; Elena Shergina; Taneisha S Scheuermann; Byron J Gajewski; Delwyn Catley; Kimber P Richter Journal: Subst Abus Date: 2022 Impact factor: 3.984
Authors: Sharon A Fitzgerald; Kimber P Richter; Laura Mussulman; Eric Howser; Shadi Nahvi; Kathy Goggin; Nina A Cooperman; Babalola Faseru Journal: Jt Comm J Qual Patient Saf Date: 2016-05
Authors: A Benjamin Srivastava; Alex T Ramsey; Leslie D McIntosh; Thomas C Bailey; Sherri L Fisher; Louis Fox; Mario Castro; Yinjiao Ma; Timothy B Baker; Li-Shiun Chen; Laura J Bierut Journal: Nicotine Tob Res Date: 2019-04-17 Impact factor: 4.244
Authors: Babalola Faseru; Edward F Ellerbeck; Delwyn Catley; Byron J Gajewski; Taneisha S Scheuermann; Theresa I Shireman; Laura M Mussulman; Niaman Nazir; Terry Bush; Kimber P Richter Journal: Trials Date: 2017-08-14 Impact factor: 2.279
Authors: Kristin L Serowik; Kimberly A Yonkers; Kathryn Gilstad-Hayden; Ariadna Forray; Paula Zimbrean; Steve Martino Journal: J Gen Intern Med Date: 2020-10-27 Impact factor: 5.128
Authors: Kimber P Richter; Babalola Faseru; Laura M Mussulman; Edward F Ellerbeck; Theresa I Shireman; Jamie J Hunt; Beatriz H Carlini; Kristopher J Preacher; Candace L Ayars; David J Cook Journal: Trials Date: 2012-08-01 Impact factor: 2.279