Literature DB >> 33111239

Substance Use Disorder Detection Rates Among Providers of General Medical Inpatients.

Kristin L Serowik1,2, Kimberly A Yonkers3, Kathryn Gilstad-Hayden3,4, Ariadna Forray3, Paula Zimbrean3, Steve Martino3,4.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The prevalence of substance use disorders is higher among medical inpatients than in the general population, placing inpatient providers in a prime position to detect these patients and intervene.
OBJECTIVE: To assess provider detection rates of substance use disorders among medical inpatients and to identify patient characteristics associated with detection.
DESIGN: Data drawn from a cluster randomized controlled trial that tested the effectiveness of three distinct implementation strategies for providers to screen patients for substance use disorders and deliver a brief intervention (Clinical Trials.gov : NCT01825057). PARTICIPANTS: A total of 1076 patients receiving care from 13 general medical inpatient units in a large teaching hospital participated in this study. MAIN MEASURES: Data sources included patient self-reported questionnaires, a diagnostic interview for substance use disorders, and patient medical records. Provider detection was determined by diagnoses documented in medical records. KEY
RESULTS: Provider detection rates were highest for nicotine use disorder (72.2%) and lowest for cannabis use disorder (26.4%). Detection of alcohol use disorder was more likely among male compared to female patients (OR (95% CI) = 4.0 (1.9, 4.8)). When compared to White patients, alcohol (OR (95% CI) = 0.4 (0.2, 0.6)) and opioid (OR (95% CI) = 0.2 (0.1, 0.7)) use disorders were less likely to be detected among Black patients, while alcohol (OR (95% CI) = 0.3 (0.0, 2.0)) and cocaine (OR (95% CI) = 0.3 (0.1, 0.9)) use disorders were less likely to be detected among Hispanic patients. Providers were more likely to detect nicotine, alcohol, opioid, and other drug use disorders among patients with higher addiction severity (OR (95% CI) = 1.20 (1.08-1.34), 1.62 (1.48, 1.78), 1.46 (1.07, 1.98), 1.38 (1.00, 1.90), respectively).
CONCLUSIONS: Findings indicate patient characteristics, including gender, race, and addiction severity impact rates of provider detection. Instituting formal screening for all substances may increase provider detection and inform treatment decisions.

Entities:  

Keywords:  detection; diagnosis; hospitalization; substance use disorder

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 33111239      PMCID: PMC7947066          DOI: 10.1007/s11606-020-06319-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Gen Intern Med        ISSN: 0884-8734            Impact factor:   5.128


  71 in total

Review 1.  Understanding the provider contribution to race/ethnicity disparities in pain treatment: insights from dual process models of stereotyping.

Authors:  Diana J Burgess; Michelle van Ryn; Megan Crowley-Matoka; Jennifer Malat
Journal:  Pain Med       Date:  2006 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 3.750

Review 2.  Global burden of disease attributable to mental and substance use disorders: findings from the Global Burden of Disease Study 2010.

Authors:  Harvey A Whiteford; Louisa Degenhardt; Jürgen Rehm; Amanda J Baxter; Alize J Ferrari; Holly E Erskine; Fiona J Charlson; Rosana E Norman; Abraham D Flaxman; Nicole Johns; Roy Burstein; Christopher J L Murray; Theo Vos
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2013-08-29       Impact factor: 79.321

3.  A 12-Item Short-Form Health Survey: construction of scales and preliminary tests of reliability and validity.

Authors:  J Ware; M Kosinski; S D Keller
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  1996-03       Impact factor: 2.983

4.  Multicomorbidity of chronic diseases and substance use disorders and their association with hospitalization: Results from electronic health records data.

Authors:  Li-Tzy Wu; He Zhu; Udi E Ghitza
Journal:  Drug Alcohol Depend       Date:  2018-10-02       Impact factor: 4.492

5.  Opioid use and stigma: The role of gender, language and precipitating events.

Authors:  Kimberly Goodyear; Carolina L Haass-Koffler; David Chavanne
Journal:  Drug Alcohol Depend       Date:  2018-02-23       Impact factor: 4.492

6.  Physician unawareness of serious substance abuse.

Authors:  R Saitz; K P Mulvey; A Plough; J H Samet
Journal:  Am J Drug Alcohol Abuse       Date:  1997-08       Impact factor: 3.829

7.  Identifying patients with problematic drug use in the emergency department: results of a multisite study.

Authors:  Wendy L Macias Konstantopoulos; Jessica A Dreifuss; Katherine A McDermott; Blair Alden Parry; Melissa L Howell; Raul N Mandler; Garrett M Fitzmaurice; Michael P Bogenschutz; Roger D Weiss
Journal:  Ann Emerg Med       Date:  2014-07-03       Impact factor: 5.721

8.  The Fifth Edition of the Addiction Severity Index.

Authors:  A T McLellan; H Kushner; D Metzger; R Peters; I Smith; G Grissom; H Pettinati; M Argeriou
Journal:  J Subst Abuse Treat       Date:  1992

Review 9.  The Mini-International Neuropsychiatric Interview (M.I.N.I.): the development and validation of a structured diagnostic psychiatric interview for DSM-IV and ICD-10.

Authors:  D V Sheehan; Y Lecrubier; K H Sheehan; P Amorim; J Janavs; E Weiller; T Hergueta; R Baker; G C Dunbar
Journal:  J Clin Psychiatry       Date:  1998       Impact factor: 4.384

10.  Marijuana and chronic obstructive lung disease: a population-based study.

Authors:  Wan C Tan; Christine Lo; Aimee Jong; Li Xing; Mark J Fitzgerald; William M Vollmer; Sonia A Buist; Don D Sin
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2009-04-14       Impact factor: 8.262

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.