Literature DB >> 19946665

Rotational and translational laxity after computer-navigated single- and double-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction.

M Hofbauer1, P Valentin, R Kdolsky, R C Ostermann, A Graf, M Figl, S Aldrian.   

Abstract

Based on biomechanical cadaver studies, anatomic double-bundle reconstruction of the anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) was introduced to achieve better stability in the knee, particularly in respect of rotatory loads. Previously, the success of ACL reconstruction was believed to be mainly dependent on correct positioning of the graft, irrespective of the number of reconstructed bundles for which computer-assisted surgery was developed to avoid malpositioning of the tunnel. The aim of the present study is to compare rotational and translational stability after computer-navigated standard single-bundle, and anatomic double-bundle ACL reconstruction. The authors investigated 55 consecutive patients who had undergone the single-bundle or double-bundle ACL reconstruction procedure with the use of autogenous hamstring tendon grafts and EndoButton fixation, and the patients had been followed for a minimum period of 24 months. Intraoperative, anteroposterior and rotational laxity was measured with the computer navigation system, and compared between groups. Both surgical procedures significantly reduced anteroposterior displacement (AP) and internal rotation (IR) of the tibia compared to the pre-operative ACL-deficient knee (P < 0.05). No significant differences were registered between groups with regard to anteroposterior displacement of the tibia. A significantly greater reduction in internal rotation was noted in the double-bundle group (15.6 degrees) compared to the single-bundle group (7.1 degrees). The IKDC and Lysholm score were significantly higher in the double-bundle group. However, the results were excellent in both groups. The use of a computer-assisted ACL reconstruction, which is a highly accurate method of graft placement, could be useful for inexperienced surgeons to avoid malposition. Whether double-bundle ACL reconstruction, which was associated with improved rotational laxity and significantly better IKDC and Lysholm scores compared to the standard single-bundle ACL reconstruction procedure, provide an influence in terms of avoiding osteoarthritis or meniscus degeneration, long-term results of at least 5 years are needed.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19946665     DOI: 10.1007/s00167-009-0992-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc        ISSN: 0942-2056            Impact factor:   4.342


  36 in total

1.  Kinematics and laxity of the knee joint after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: pre- and postoperative radiostereometric studies.

Authors:  Sveinbjörn Brandsson; Jon Karlsson; Leif Swärd; Jüri Kartus; Bengt I Eriksson; Johan Kärrholm
Journal:  Am J Sports Med       Date:  2002 May-Jun       Impact factor: 6.202

2.  Relationships between objective assessment of ligament stability and subjective assessment of symptoms and function after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction.

Authors:  Mininder S Kocher; J Richard Steadman; Karen K Briggs; William I Sterett; Richard J Hawkins
Journal:  Am J Sports Med       Date:  2004 Apr-May       Impact factor: 6.202

3.  Single femoral socket double-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction using tibialis anterior tendon: description of a new technique.

Authors:  David N M Caborn; Haw Chong Chang
Journal:  Arthroscopy       Date:  2005-10       Impact factor: 4.772

4.  Anatomic double-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction.

Authors:  Anthony M Buoncristiani; Fotios P Tjoumakaris; James S Starman; Mario Ferretti; Freddie H Fu
Journal:  Arthroscopy       Date:  2006-09       Impact factor: 4.772

Review 5.  The double-bundle technique for anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a systematic overview.

Authors:  H Steckel; J S Starman; M H Baums; H M Klinger; W Schultz; F H Fu
Journal:  Scand J Med Sci Sports       Date:  2006-11-01       Impact factor: 4.221

Review 6.  Anatomic double bundle ACL reconstruction: a literature review.

Authors:  Charles Crawford; John Nyland; Sarah Landes; Richard Jackson; Haw Chong Chang; Akbar Nawab; David N M Caborn
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2007-05-30       Impact factor: 4.342

7.  Outcome of single-bundle versus double-bundle reconstruction of the anterior cruciate ligament: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Richard B Meredick; Kennan J Vance; David Appleby; James H Lubowitz
Journal:  Am J Sports Med       Date:  2008-05-28       Impact factor: 6.202

Review 8.  Computer-assisted surgery for anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction.

Authors:  Pradeep Kodali; Scott Yang; Jason Koh
Journal:  Sports Med Arthrosc Rev       Date:  2008-06       Impact factor: 1.985

9.  Rating systems in the evaluation of knee ligament injuries.

Authors:  Y Tegner; J Lysholm
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  1985-09       Impact factor: 4.176

10.  Anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. A prospective randomized study of three surgical methods.

Authors:  A F Anderson; R B Snyder; A B Lipscomb
Journal:  Am J Sports Med       Date:  2001 May-Jun       Impact factor: 6.202

View more
  25 in total

1.  The effect of tunnel placement on rotational stability after ACL reconstruction: evaluation with use of triaxial accelerometry in a porcine model.

Authors:  Aníbal Debandi; Akira Maeyama; Yuichi Hoshino; Shigehiro Asai; Bunsei Goto; Patrick Smolinski; Freddie H Fu
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2012-03-23       Impact factor: 4.342

2.  MRI of double-bundle ACL reconstruction: evaluation of graft findings.

Authors:  Tommi Kiekara; Timo Järvelä; Heini Huhtala; Antti Paakkala
Journal:  Skeletal Radiol       Date:  2011-09-30       Impact factor: 2.199

Review 3.  The concept of individualized anatomic anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction.

Authors:  M Hofbauer; B Muller; C D Murawski; C F van Eck; F H Fu
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2013-06-06       Impact factor: 4.342

4.  Static rotational and sagittal knee laxity measurements after reconstruction of the anterior cruciate ligament.

Authors:  O Lorbach; M Kieb; P Brogard; S Maas; D Pape; R Seil
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2011-08-03       Impact factor: 4.342

5.  Arthroscopic anatomic double bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: Our experience with follow-up of 4 years.

Authors:  Vivek Machhindra Morey; Hira Lal Nag; Buddhadev Chowdhury; Chaitanya Dev Pannu; Sanjay Meena; Kiran Kumar; Aravindh Palaniswamy
Journal:  J Clin Orthop Trauma       Date:  2015-07-20

6.  Image-matching technique can detect rotational and AP instabilities in chronic ACL-deficient knees.

Authors:  Shinichiro Nakamura; Masahiko Kobayashi; Taiyo Asano; Ryuzo Arai; Yasuaki Nakagawa; Takashi Nakamura
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2011-05-04       Impact factor: 4.342

7.  The concept of complete footprint restoration with guidelines for single- and double-bundle ACL reconstruction.

Authors:  Rainer Siebold
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2011-01-11       Impact factor: 4.342

Review 8.  Biomechanical techniques to evaluate tibial rotation. A systematic review.

Authors:  Mak-Ham Lam; Daniel Tik-Pui Fong; Patrick Shu-Hang Yung; Kai-Ming Chan
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2011-09-13       Impact factor: 4.342

9.  Roles of ACL remnants in knee stability.

Authors:  Junsuke Nakase; Tatsuhiro Toratani; Masahiro Kosaka; Yoshinori Ohashi; Hiroyuki Tsuchiya
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2012-10-30       Impact factor: 4.342

Review 10.  Double-bundle versus single-bundle reconstruction for anterior cruciate ligament rupture in adults.

Authors:  Thavatchai Tiamklang; Sermsak Sumanont; Thanit Foocharoen; Malinee Laopaiboon
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2012-11-14
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.