AIMS: To assess the incremental value of real-time three-dimensional echocardiography (RT-3DTE) over contrast transthoracic echocardiography (TTE), compared with contrast transesophageal echocardiography (TEE) in the identification of patent foramen ovale (PFO). METHODS AND RESULTS: Eighty-one consecutive patients with history of migraine headache (MH) or unexplained cerebrovascular events (CE) were examined using RT-3DTE, contrast TTE, and contrast TEE in sequence. Feasibility of RT-3DE in patients with MH and CE was 98 and 91%, respectively. Mean time for 3D colour data set acquisition was 9 +/- 5 min. PFO was diagnosed using contrast TEE in 36 patients (overall prevalence = 44%). Diagnostic accuracy of RT-3DE was significantly higher than that of contrast TTE: sensitivity 83 vs. 44%, P < 0.001; specificity 100 vs. 100%, P7 = NS; positive predictive value 100 vs. 100%, P = NS; negative predictive value 88 vs. 69%, P < 0.01; accuracy 93 vs. 75%, P < 0.003. Five of the six patients in whom RT-3DTE did not identify PFOs showed a defect diameter smaller than 2 mm. CONCLUSION: RT-3DTE is a feasible, accurate, and reproducible technique to detect PFO without the need of saline contrast injection. Its accuracy is superior to contrast 2D TTE and close to that of contrast TEE.
AIMS: To assess the incremental value of real-time three-dimensional echocardiography (RT-3DTE) over contrast transthoracic echocardiography (TTE), compared with contrast transesophageal echocardiography (TEE) in the identification of patent foramen ovale (PFO). METHODS AND RESULTS: Eighty-one consecutive patients with history of migraineheadache (MH) or unexplained cerebrovascular events (CE) were examined using RT-3DTE, contrast TTE, and contrast TEE in sequence. Feasibility of RT-3DE in patients with MH and CE was 98 and 91%, respectively. Mean time for 3D colour data set acquisition was 9 +/- 5 min. PFO was diagnosed using contrast TEE in 36 patients (overall prevalence = 44%). Diagnostic accuracy of RT-3DE was significantly higher than that of contrast TTE: sensitivity 83 vs. 44%, P < 0.001; specificity 100 vs. 100%, P7 = NS; positive predictive value 100 vs. 100%, P = NS; negative predictive value 88 vs. 69%, P < 0.01; accuracy 93 vs. 75%, P < 0.003. Five of the six patients in whom RT-3DTE did not identify PFOs showed a defect diameter smaller than 2 mm. CONCLUSION: RT-3DTE is a feasible, accurate, and reproducible technique to detect PFO without the need of saline contrast injection. Its accuracy is superior to contrast 2D TTE and close to that of contrast TEE.
Authors: Mingming Ning; Eng H Lo; Pei-Chen Ning; Su-Yu Xu; David McMullin; Zareh Demirjian; Ignacio Inglessis; G William Dec; Igor Palacios; Ferdinando S Buonanno Journal: Pharmacol Ther Date: 2013-03-23 Impact factor: 12.310
Authors: Monika Komar; Maria Olszowska; Tadeusz Przewłocki; Jakub Podolec; Jakub Stępniewski; Bartosz Sobień; Rafał Badacz; Anna Kabłak-Ziembicka; Lidia Tomkiewicz-Pająk; Piotr Podolec Journal: Cardiovasc Ultrasound Date: 2014-05-22 Impact factor: 2.062