Literature DB >> 19945818

Shared decision-making in cardiology: do patients want it and do doctors provide it?

David Burton1, Nicholas Blundell, Mari Jones, Alan Fraser, Glyn Elwyn.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Doctors should involve their patients in making decisions about their care. We studied patients with heart disease to assess if shared decision-making occurs and to study factors that predict patients' choices or influence cardiologists' behaviour.
METHODS: 85 patients attending for arteriography were assessed to elicit preferred involvement in decision-making, perception of involvement, and confidence in the decision.
RESULTS: 40% of patients wished to be involved in decisions. Preferences were unrelated to demographic factors. Cardiologists involved patients more in decisions concerning severe disease (p=0.056). Involvement varied between cardiologists (p=0.001). The mean duration of consultations was 5.5 min. Patients' confidence in decisions correlated with duration (p=0.001), explicit reference to a decision that needed to be made (p=0.0026), and perceived, but not observed, involvement in decision-making (p=0.05).
CONCLUSION: This study highlighted the complexity of doctor-patient communication. Irrespective of preferences for involvement, patients were more confident in decisions in which they perceived more involvement or which were the products of longer consultations. PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS: Patients' confidence in clinical decisions can be increased by increasing consultation length and increasing their perception of involvement. Patients perceive more involvement in decisions when doctors specifically identify the need for treatment decisions early in the consultation. Copyright 2009 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19945818     DOI: 10.1016/j.pec.2009.10.013

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Patient Educ Couns        ISSN: 0738-3991


  28 in total

1.  Physicians' shared decision-making behaviors in attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder care.

Authors:  William B Brinkman; Jessica Hartl; Lauren M Rawe; Heidi Sucharew; Maria T Britto; Jeffery N Epstein
Journal:  Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med       Date:  2011-11

Review 2.  Where is the evidence? A systematic review of shared decision making and patient outcomes.

Authors:  L Aubree Shay; Jennifer Elston Lafata
Journal:  Med Decis Making       Date:  2014-10-28       Impact factor: 2.583

Review 3.  Assessments of the extent to which health-care providers involve patients in decision making: a systematic review of studies using the OPTION instrument.

Authors:  Nicolas Couët; Sophie Desroches; Hubert Robitaille; Hugues Vaillancourt; Annie Leblanc; Stéphane Turcotte; Glyn Elwyn; France Légaré
Journal:  Health Expect       Date:  2013-03-04       Impact factor: 3.377

4.  Understanding patient perceptions of shared decision making.

Authors:  L Aubree Shay; Jennifer Elston Lafata
Journal:  Patient Educ Couns       Date:  2014-07-21

5.  A Simple Goal Elicitation Tool Improves Shared Decision Making in Outpatient Orthopedic Surgery: A Randomized Controlled Trial.

Authors:  Kevin Mertz; Romil F Shah; Sara L Eppler; Jeffrey Yao; Marc Safran; Ariel Palanca; Serena S Hu; Michael Gardner; Derek F Amanatullah; Robin N Kamal
Journal:  Med Decis Making       Date:  2020-08-01       Impact factor: 2.583

6.  Heart failure patients' descriptions of participation in structured home care.

Authors:  Lena M Näsström; Ewa A-C Idvall; Anna E Strömberg
Journal:  Health Expect       Date:  2013-08-21       Impact factor: 3.377

7.  Shared decision-making in atrial fibrillation: patient-reported involvement in treatment decisions.

Authors:  Fatima Ali-Ahmed; Karen Pieper; Rebecca North; Larry A Allen; Paul S Chan; Michael D Ezekowitz; Gregg C Fonarow; James V Freeman; Alan S Go; Bernard J Gersh; Peter R Kowey; Kenneth W Mahaffey; Gerald V Naccarelli; Sean D Pokorney; James A Reiffel; Daniel E Singer; Benjamin A Steinberg; Eric D Peterson; Jonathan P Piccini; Emily C O'Brien
Journal:  Eur Heart J Qual Care Clin Outcomes       Date:  2020-10-01

8.  Shared decision-making in back pain consultations: an illusion or reality?

Authors:  L E Jones; L C Roberts; P S Little; M A Mullee; J A Cleland; C Cooper
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2014-01-30       Impact factor: 3.134

9.  Perceptions of Shared Decision Making Among Patients with Spinal Cord Injuries/Disorders.

Authors:  Sara M Locatelli; Bella Etingen; Allen Heinemann; Holly DeMark Neumann; Ana Miskovic; David Chen; Sherri L LaVela
Journal:  Top Spinal Cord Inj Rehabil       Date:  2016

10.  Comparing the nine-item Shared Decision-Making Questionnaire to the OPTION Scale - an attempt to establish convergent validity.

Authors:  Isabelle Scholl; Levente Kriston; Jörg Dirmaier; Martin Härter
Journal:  Health Expect       Date:  2012-11-26       Impact factor: 3.377

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.