Literature DB >> 19945779

Comprehensive standardized report of complications of retropubic and laparoscopic radical prostatectomy.

Farhang Rabbani1, Luis Herran Yunis, Rodrigo Pinochet, Lucas Nogueira, Kinjal C Vora, James A Eastham, Bertrand Guillonneau, Vincent Laudone, Peter T Scardino, Karim Touijer.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The lack of standardized reporting of the complications of radical prostatectomy in the literature has made it difficult to compare incidences across institutions and across different surgical approaches.
OBJECTIVE: To define comprehensively the incidence, severity, and timing of onset of medical and surgical complications of open retropubic prostatectomy (RP) and laparoscopic radical prostatectomy (LP) using a standardized reporting methodology to facilitate comparison. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: Between January 1999 and June 2007, 4592 consecutive patients underwent RP or LP without prior radiation or hormonal therapy. Median follow-up was 36.9 mo (interquartile range: 20.3-60.6). INTERVENTION: Open or laparoscopic radical prostatectomy. MEASUREMENTS: All medical and surgical complications of radical prostatectomy were captured and graded according to the modified Clavien classification and classified by timing of onset. RESULTS AND LIMITATIONS: There were 612 medical complications in 467 patients (10.2%) and 1426 surgical complications in 925 patients (20.1%). The overall incidences of early minor and major medical and surgical complications for RP were 8.5% and 1.5% for medical and 11.4% and 4.9% for surgical complications, respectively. The overall incidences of early minor and major medical and surgical complications for LP were 14.2% and 2.3% for medical and 23.1% and 6.6% for surgical complications, respectively. On multivariate analysis, LP approach was associated with a higher incidence of any grade medical and surgical complications but a lower incidence of major surgical complications than RP. Six hundred fifty-two men (14.2%) visited the emergency department, and 240 men (5.2%) required readmission. The main limitation is the retrospective nature.
CONCLUSIONS: With standardized reporting, the incidence of some complications is higher than recognized in the literature. Although most complications are minor in severity, medical and surgical complications are observed in approximately 10% and 20% of patients, respectively. Accurate reporting of complications through a standardized methodology is essential for counseling patients regarding risk of complications, for identifying modifiable risk factors, and for facilitating comparison across institutions and approaches. 2009 European Association of Urology. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19945779     DOI: 10.1016/j.eururo.2009.11.034

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Urol        ISSN: 0302-2838            Impact factor:   20.096


  38 in total

1.  The effect of annual surgical caseload on the rates of in-hospital pneumonia and other in-hospital outcomes after radical prostatectomy.

Authors:  Jan Schmitges; Quoc-Dien Trinh; Marco Bianchi; Maxine Sun; Firas Abdollah; Sascha A Ahyai; Claudio Jeldres; Thomas Steuber; Paul Perrotte; Shahrokh F Shariat; Mani Menon; Francesco Montorsi; Markus Graefen; Pierre I Karakiewicz
Journal:  Int Urol Nephrol       Date:  2011-12-13       Impact factor: 2.370

2.  [Radical prostatectomy - pro laparoscopic].

Authors:  H M Do; S Holze; H Qazi; A Dietel; T Häfner; E Liatsikos; J-U Stolzenburg
Journal:  Urologe A       Date:  2012-05       Impact factor: 0.639

3.  Treatment of localised prostate cancer with radiation therapy: evidence versus opinion.

Authors:  Ferran Guedea; Alfredo Ramos; Ismael Herruzo; José Antonio Sánchez Calzado; Jorge Contreras; Jesús Romero; Jordi Craven-Bartle; Patricia Willisch; José Luis López Torrecilla; Xavier Maldonado; Gemma Sancho; Almudena Zapatero; Montserrat Ferrer; Yolanda Pardo; Pablo Fernández; Alfonso Mariño; Asunción Hervás; Víctor Macís; Ana Boladeras; Ferran Ferrer; Brian J Davis
Journal:  Clin Transl Oncol       Date:  2010-05       Impact factor: 3.405

4.  [Diagnostics and therapy of localized prostate cancer: a problem-oriented account].

Authors:  C Weber
Journal:  Radiologe       Date:  2011-11       Impact factor: 0.635

5.  Recommendations on screening for prostate cancer with the prostate-specific antigen test.

Authors:  Neil Bell; Sarah Connor Gorber; Amanda Shane; Michel Joffres; Harminder Singh; James Dickinson; Elizabeth Shaw; Lesley Dunfield; Marcello Tonelli
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2014-10-27       Impact factor: 8.262

6.  [Complications of radical retropubic prostatectomies based on the Martin criteria].

Authors:  B Löppenberg; J Noldus; J Palisaar
Journal:  Urologe A       Date:  2011-11       Impact factor: 0.639

Review 7.  A Systematic Review of Emergency Department Use Among Cancer Patients.

Authors:  Rebecca S Lash; Janice F Bell; Sarah C Reed; Hermine Poghosyan; James Rodgers; Katherine K Kim; Richard J Bold; Jill G Joseph
Journal:  Cancer Nurs       Date:  2017 Mar/Apr       Impact factor: 2.592

Review 8.  How to minimize lymphoceles and treat clinically symptomatic lymphoceles after radical prostatectomy.

Authors:  Hak J Lee; Christopher J Kane
Journal:  Curr Urol Rep       Date:  2014-10       Impact factor: 3.092

9.  [Radical prostatectomy. Detection and management of intra- and postoperative complications].

Authors:  M Saar; C H Ohlmann; M Janssen; M Stöckle; S Siemer
Journal:  Urologe A       Date:  2014-07       Impact factor: 0.639

Review 10.  Posterior urethral complications of radical prostatectomy.

Authors:  Michael Coburn
Journal:  Can Urol Assoc J       Date:  2013-09       Impact factor: 1.862

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.